Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo oscillating gradient and microscopic anisotropy diffusion MRI in mice at 9.4 Tesla.

<h4>Background and purpose</h4>Microstructure imaging with advanced diffusion MRI (dMRI) techniques have shown increased sensitivity and specificity to microstructural changes in various disease and injury models. Oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE) dMRI, implemented by varying the osc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naila Rahman, Kathy Xu, Mohammad Omer, Matthew D Budde, Arthur Brown, Corey A Baron
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255711
_version_ 1798032630177857536
author Naila Rahman
Kathy Xu
Mohammad Omer
Matthew D Budde
Arthur Brown
Corey A Baron
author_facet Naila Rahman
Kathy Xu
Mohammad Omer
Matthew D Budde
Arthur Brown
Corey A Baron
author_sort Naila Rahman
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background and purpose</h4>Microstructure imaging with advanced diffusion MRI (dMRI) techniques have shown increased sensitivity and specificity to microstructural changes in various disease and injury models. Oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE) dMRI, implemented by varying the oscillating gradient frequency, and microscopic anisotropy (μA) dMRI, implemented via tensor valued diffusion encoding, may provide additional insight by increasing sensitivity to smaller spatial scales and disentangling fiber orientation dispersion from true microstructural changes, respectively. The aims of this study were to characterize the test-retest reproducibility of in vivo OGSE and μA dMRI metrics in the mouse brain at 9.4 Tesla and provide estimates of required sample sizes for future investigations.<h4>Methods</h4>Twelve adult C57Bl/6 mice were scanned twice (5 days apart). Each imaging session consisted of multifrequency OGSE and μA dMRI protocols. Metrics investigated included μA, linear diffusion kurtosis, isotropic diffusion kurtosis, and the diffusion dispersion rate (Λ), which explores the power-law frequency dependence of mean diffusivity. The dMRI metric maps were analyzed with mean region-of-interest (ROI) and whole brain voxel-wise analysis. Bland-Altman plots and coefficients of variation (CV) were used to assess the reproducibility of OGSE and μA metrics. Furthermore, we estimated sample sizes required to detect a variety of effect sizes.<h4>Results</h4>Bland-Altman plots showed negligible biases between test and retest sessions. ROI-based CVs revealed high reproducibility for most metrics (CVs < 15%). Voxel-wise CV maps revealed high reproducibility for μA (CVs ~ 10%), but low reproducibility for OGSE metrics (CVs ~ 50%).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Most of the μA dMRI metrics are reproducible in both ROI-based and voxel-wise analysis, while the OGSE dMRI metrics are only reproducible in ROI-based analysis. Given feasible sample sizes (10-15), μA metrics and OGSE metrics may provide sensitivity to subtle microstructural changes (4-8%) and moderate changes (> 6%), respectively.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:17:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-83c06e3472ff4337899076cc1ced486e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:17:09Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-83c06e3472ff4337899076cc1ced486e2022-12-22T04:04:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-011611e025571110.1371/journal.pone.0255711Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo oscillating gradient and microscopic anisotropy diffusion MRI in mice at 9.4 Tesla.Naila RahmanKathy XuMohammad OmerMatthew D BuddeArthur BrownCorey A Baron<h4>Background and purpose</h4>Microstructure imaging with advanced diffusion MRI (dMRI) techniques have shown increased sensitivity and specificity to microstructural changes in various disease and injury models. Oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE) dMRI, implemented by varying the oscillating gradient frequency, and microscopic anisotropy (μA) dMRI, implemented via tensor valued diffusion encoding, may provide additional insight by increasing sensitivity to smaller spatial scales and disentangling fiber orientation dispersion from true microstructural changes, respectively. The aims of this study were to characterize the test-retest reproducibility of in vivo OGSE and μA dMRI metrics in the mouse brain at 9.4 Tesla and provide estimates of required sample sizes for future investigations.<h4>Methods</h4>Twelve adult C57Bl/6 mice were scanned twice (5 days apart). Each imaging session consisted of multifrequency OGSE and μA dMRI protocols. Metrics investigated included μA, linear diffusion kurtosis, isotropic diffusion kurtosis, and the diffusion dispersion rate (Λ), which explores the power-law frequency dependence of mean diffusivity. The dMRI metric maps were analyzed with mean region-of-interest (ROI) and whole brain voxel-wise analysis. Bland-Altman plots and coefficients of variation (CV) were used to assess the reproducibility of OGSE and μA metrics. Furthermore, we estimated sample sizes required to detect a variety of effect sizes.<h4>Results</h4>Bland-Altman plots showed negligible biases between test and retest sessions. ROI-based CVs revealed high reproducibility for most metrics (CVs < 15%). Voxel-wise CV maps revealed high reproducibility for μA (CVs ~ 10%), but low reproducibility for OGSE metrics (CVs ~ 50%).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Most of the μA dMRI metrics are reproducible in both ROI-based and voxel-wise analysis, while the OGSE dMRI metrics are only reproducible in ROI-based analysis. Given feasible sample sizes (10-15), μA metrics and OGSE metrics may provide sensitivity to subtle microstructural changes (4-8%) and moderate changes (> 6%), respectively.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255711
spellingShingle Naila Rahman
Kathy Xu
Mohammad Omer
Matthew D Budde
Arthur Brown
Corey A Baron
Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo oscillating gradient and microscopic anisotropy diffusion MRI in mice at 9.4 Tesla.
PLoS ONE
title Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo oscillating gradient and microscopic anisotropy diffusion MRI in mice at 9.4 Tesla.
title_full Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo oscillating gradient and microscopic anisotropy diffusion MRI in mice at 9.4 Tesla.
title_fullStr Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo oscillating gradient and microscopic anisotropy diffusion MRI in mice at 9.4 Tesla.
title_full_unstemmed Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo oscillating gradient and microscopic anisotropy diffusion MRI in mice at 9.4 Tesla.
title_short Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo oscillating gradient and microscopic anisotropy diffusion MRI in mice at 9.4 Tesla.
title_sort test retest reproducibility of in vivo oscillating gradient and microscopic anisotropy diffusion mri in mice at 9 4 tesla
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255711
work_keys_str_mv AT nailarahman testretestreproducibilityofinvivooscillatinggradientandmicroscopicanisotropydiffusionmriinmiceat94tesla
AT kathyxu testretestreproducibilityofinvivooscillatinggradientandmicroscopicanisotropydiffusionmriinmiceat94tesla
AT mohammadomer testretestreproducibilityofinvivooscillatinggradientandmicroscopicanisotropydiffusionmriinmiceat94tesla
AT matthewdbudde testretestreproducibilityofinvivooscillatinggradientandmicroscopicanisotropydiffusionmriinmiceat94tesla
AT arthurbrown testretestreproducibilityofinvivooscillatinggradientandmicroscopicanisotropydiffusionmriinmiceat94tesla
AT coreyabaron testretestreproducibilityofinvivooscillatinggradientandmicroscopicanisotropydiffusionmriinmiceat94tesla