An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage

Oxygen (O2) concentration inside the substrate is an important measurement for silage-research and-practical management. In the laboratory gas chromatography is commonly employed for O2 measurement. Among sensor-based techniques, accurate and reliable in situ measurement is rare because of high leve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guilin Shan, Yurui Sun, Menghua Li, Kerstin H. Jungbluth, Christian Maack, Wolfgang Buescher, Kai-Benjamin Schütt, Peter Boeker, Peter Schulze Lammers, Haiyang Zhou, Qiang Cheng, Daokun Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-01-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/16/1/91
_version_ 1798002502217498624
author Guilin Shan
Yurui Sun
Menghua Li
Kerstin H. Jungbluth
Christian Maack
Wolfgang Buescher
Kai-Benjamin Schütt
Peter Boeker
Peter Schulze Lammers
Haiyang Zhou
Qiang Cheng
Daokun Ma
author_facet Guilin Shan
Yurui Sun
Menghua Li
Kerstin H. Jungbluth
Christian Maack
Wolfgang Buescher
Kai-Benjamin Schütt
Peter Boeker
Peter Schulze Lammers
Haiyang Zhou
Qiang Cheng
Daokun Ma
author_sort Guilin Shan
collection DOAJ
description Oxygen (O2) concentration inside the substrate is an important measurement for silage-research and-practical management. In the laboratory gas chromatography is commonly employed for O2 measurement. Among sensor-based techniques, accurate and reliable in situ measurement is rare because of high levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) generated by the introduction of O2 in the silage. The presented study focused on assessing three types of commercial O2 sensors, including Clark oxygen electrodes (COE), galvanic oxygen cell (GOC) sensors and the Dräger chip measurement system (DCMS). Laboratory cross calibration of O2 versus CO2 (each 0–15 vol.%) was made for the COE and the GOC sensors. All calibration results verified that O2 measurements for both sensors were insensitive to CO2. For the O2 in situ measurement in silage, all O2 sensors were first tested in two sealed barrels (diameter 35.7 cm; height: 60 cm) to monitor the O2 depletion with respect to the ensiling process (Test-A). The second test (Test-B) simulated the silage unloading process by recording the O2 penetration dynamics in three additional barrels, two covered by dry ice (0.6 kg or 1.2 kg of each) on the top surface and one without. Based on a general comparison of the experimental data, we conclude that each of these in situ sensor monitoring techniques for O2 concentration in silage exhibit individual advantages and limitations.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T11:53:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-83c467fa127f4616803804d66becaec2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T11:53:09Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-83c467fa127f4616803804d66becaec22022-12-22T04:25:15ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202016-01-011619110.3390/s16010091s16010091An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and StorageGuilin Shan0Yurui Sun1Menghua Li2Kerstin H. Jungbluth3Christian Maack4Wolfgang Buescher5Kai-Benjamin Schütt6Peter Boeker7Peter Schulze Lammers8Haiyang Zhou9Qiang Cheng10Daokun Ma11College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Key Lab of Agricultural Information Acquisition Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 100083 Beijing, ChinaCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Key Lab of Agricultural Information Acquisition Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 100083 Beijing, ChinaCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Key Lab of Agricultural Information Acquisition Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 100083 Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, The University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, GermanyDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, The University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, GermanyDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, The University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, GermanyDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, The University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, GermanyDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, The University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, GermanyDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, The University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, GermanyCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Key Lab of Agricultural Information Acquisition Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 100083 Beijing, ChinaCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Key Lab of Agricultural Information Acquisition Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 100083 Beijing, ChinaCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Key Lab of Agricultural Information Acquisition Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, 100083 Beijing, ChinaOxygen (O2) concentration inside the substrate is an important measurement for silage-research and-practical management. In the laboratory gas chromatography is commonly employed for O2 measurement. Among sensor-based techniques, accurate and reliable in situ measurement is rare because of high levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) generated by the introduction of O2 in the silage. The presented study focused on assessing three types of commercial O2 sensors, including Clark oxygen electrodes (COE), galvanic oxygen cell (GOC) sensors and the Dräger chip measurement system (DCMS). Laboratory cross calibration of O2 versus CO2 (each 0–15 vol.%) was made for the COE and the GOC sensors. All calibration results verified that O2 measurements for both sensors were insensitive to CO2. For the O2 in situ measurement in silage, all O2 sensors were first tested in two sealed barrels (diameter 35.7 cm; height: 60 cm) to monitor the O2 depletion with respect to the ensiling process (Test-A). The second test (Test-B) simulated the silage unloading process by recording the O2 penetration dynamics in three additional barrels, two covered by dry ice (0.6 kg or 1.2 kg of each) on the top surface and one without. Based on a general comparison of the experimental data, we conclude that each of these in situ sensor monitoring techniques for O2 concentration in silage exhibit individual advantages and limitations.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/16/1/91oxygen (O2)carbon dioxide (CO2)galvanic oxygen cell (GOC)Clark oxygen electrodes (COE)Dräger chip measurement system (DCMS)silage
spellingShingle Guilin Shan
Yurui Sun
Menghua Li
Kerstin H. Jungbluth
Christian Maack
Wolfgang Buescher
Kai-Benjamin Schütt
Peter Boeker
Peter Schulze Lammers
Haiyang Zhou
Qiang Cheng
Daokun Ma
An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage
Sensors
oxygen (O2)
carbon dioxide (CO2)
galvanic oxygen cell (GOC)
Clark oxygen electrodes (COE)
Dräger chip measurement system (DCMS)
silage
title An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage
title_full An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage
title_fullStr An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage
title_full_unstemmed An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage
title_short An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage
title_sort assessment of three different in situ oxygen sensors for monitoring silage production and storage
topic oxygen (O2)
carbon dioxide (CO2)
galvanic oxygen cell (GOC)
Clark oxygen electrodes (COE)
Dräger chip measurement system (DCMS)
silage
url http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/16/1/91
work_keys_str_mv AT guilinshan anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT yuruisun anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT menghuali anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT kerstinhjungbluth anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT christianmaack anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT wolfgangbuescher anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT kaibenjaminschutt anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT peterboeker anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT peterschulzelammers anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT haiyangzhou anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT qiangcheng anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT daokunma anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT guilinshan assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT yuruisun assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT menghuali assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT kerstinhjungbluth assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT christianmaack assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT wolfgangbuescher assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT kaibenjaminschutt assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT peterboeker assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT peterschulzelammers assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT haiyangzhou assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT qiangcheng assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT daokunma assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage