Rapid reduction versus abrupt quitting for smokers who want to stop soon: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The standard way to stop smoking is to stop abruptly on a quit day with no prior reduction in consumption of cigarettes. Many smokers feel that reduction is natural and if reduction programmes were offered, many more might take up tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: West Robert, Beach Jane, Inglis Jennie, Ingram Jackie T, Aveyard Paul, Lindson Nicola, Michie Susan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-08-01
Series:Trials
Online Access:http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/10/1/69
_version_ 1818663882339647488
author West Robert
Beach Jane
Inglis Jennie
Ingram Jackie T
Aveyard Paul
Lindson Nicola
Michie Susan
author_facet West Robert
Beach Jane
Inglis Jennie
Ingram Jackie T
Aveyard Paul
Lindson Nicola
Michie Susan
author_sort West Robert
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The standard way to stop smoking is to stop abruptly on a quit day with no prior reduction in consumption of cigarettes. Many smokers feel that reduction is natural and if reduction programmes were offered, many more might take up treatment. Few trials of reduction versus abrupt cessation have been completed. Most are small, do not use pharmacotherapy, and do not meet the standards necessary to obtain a marketing authorisation for a pharmacotherapy.</p> <p>Design/Methods</p> <p>We will conduct a non-inferiority randomised trial of rapid reduction versus standard abrupt cessation among smokers who want to stop smoking. In the reduction arm, participants will be advised to reduce smoking consumption by half in the first week and to 25% of baseline in the second, leading up to a quit day at which participants will stop smoking completely. This will be assisted by nicotine patches and an acute form of nicotine replacement therapy. In the abrupt arm participants will use nicotine patches only, whilst smoking as normal, for two weeks prior to a quit day, at which they will also stop smoking completely. Smokers in either arm will have standard withdrawal orientated behavioural support programme with a combination of nicotine patches and acute nicotine replacement therapy post-cessation.</p> <p>Outcomes/Follow-up</p> <p>The primary outcome of interest will be prolonged abstinence from smoking, with secondary trial outcomes of point prevalence, urges to smoke and withdrawal symptoms. Follow up will take place at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 6 months post-quit day.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN22526020</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-17T05:23:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-83dee8445c154b9883192f509092a428
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-6215
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T05:23:54Z
publishDate 2009-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Trials
spelling doaj.art-83dee8445c154b9883192f509092a4282022-12-21T22:01:56ZengBMCTrials1745-62152009-08-011016910.1186/1745-6215-10-69Rapid reduction versus abrupt quitting for smokers who want to stop soon: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trialWest RobertBeach JaneInglis JennieIngram Jackie TAveyard PaulLindson NicolaMichie Susan<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The standard way to stop smoking is to stop abruptly on a quit day with no prior reduction in consumption of cigarettes. Many smokers feel that reduction is natural and if reduction programmes were offered, many more might take up treatment. Few trials of reduction versus abrupt cessation have been completed. Most are small, do not use pharmacotherapy, and do not meet the standards necessary to obtain a marketing authorisation for a pharmacotherapy.</p> <p>Design/Methods</p> <p>We will conduct a non-inferiority randomised trial of rapid reduction versus standard abrupt cessation among smokers who want to stop smoking. In the reduction arm, participants will be advised to reduce smoking consumption by half in the first week and to 25% of baseline in the second, leading up to a quit day at which participants will stop smoking completely. This will be assisted by nicotine patches and an acute form of nicotine replacement therapy. In the abrupt arm participants will use nicotine patches only, whilst smoking as normal, for two weeks prior to a quit day, at which they will also stop smoking completely. Smokers in either arm will have standard withdrawal orientated behavioural support programme with a combination of nicotine patches and acute nicotine replacement therapy post-cessation.</p> <p>Outcomes/Follow-up</p> <p>The primary outcome of interest will be prolonged abstinence from smoking, with secondary trial outcomes of point prevalence, urges to smoke and withdrawal symptoms. Follow up will take place at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 6 months post-quit day.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN22526020</p>http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/10/1/69
spellingShingle West Robert
Beach Jane
Inglis Jennie
Ingram Jackie T
Aveyard Paul
Lindson Nicola
Michie Susan
Rapid reduction versus abrupt quitting for smokers who want to stop soon: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
Trials
title Rapid reduction versus abrupt quitting for smokers who want to stop soon: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
title_full Rapid reduction versus abrupt quitting for smokers who want to stop soon: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
title_fullStr Rapid reduction versus abrupt quitting for smokers who want to stop soon: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Rapid reduction versus abrupt quitting for smokers who want to stop soon: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
title_short Rapid reduction versus abrupt quitting for smokers who want to stop soon: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
title_sort rapid reduction versus abrupt quitting for smokers who want to stop soon a randomised controlled non inferiority trial
url http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/10/1/69
work_keys_str_mv AT westrobert rapidreductionversusabruptquittingforsmokerswhowanttostopsoonarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT beachjane rapidreductionversusabruptquittingforsmokerswhowanttostopsoonarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT inglisjennie rapidreductionversusabruptquittingforsmokerswhowanttostopsoonarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT ingramjackiet rapidreductionversusabruptquittingforsmokerswhowanttostopsoonarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT aveyardpaul rapidreductionversusabruptquittingforsmokerswhowanttostopsoonarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT lindsonnicola rapidreductionversusabruptquittingforsmokerswhowanttostopsoonarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT michiesusan rapidreductionversusabruptquittingforsmokerswhowanttostopsoonarandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial