The two-step approach to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) provides the only potentially curative option for multiple hematological conditions. However, allogeneic HSCT outcomes rely on an optimal balance of effective immune recovery, minimal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and lasting control of d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sikemi Ibikunle, Dolores Grosso, Usama Gergis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1237782/full
_version_ 1797729309809442816
author Sikemi Ibikunle
Dolores Grosso
Usama Gergis
author_facet Sikemi Ibikunle
Dolores Grosso
Usama Gergis
author_sort Sikemi Ibikunle
collection DOAJ
description Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) provides the only potentially curative option for multiple hematological conditions. However, allogeneic HSCT outcomes rely on an optimal balance of effective immune recovery, minimal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and lasting control of disease. The quest to attain this balance has proven challenging over the past few decades. The two-step approach to HSCT was conceptualized and pioneered at Thomas Jefferson University in 2005 and remains the main platform for allografting at our institution. Following administration of the transplant conditioning regimen, patients receive a fixed dose of donor CD3+ cells (HSCT step one-DLI) as the lymphoid portion of the graft on day -6 with the aim of optimizing and controlling T cell dosing. Cyclophosphamide (CY) is administered after the DLI (days -3 and -2) to induce donor-recipient bidirectional tolerance. On day 0, a CD34-selected stem cell graft is given as the myeloid portion of the graft (step two). In this two-step approach, the stem cell graft is infused after CY tolerization, which avoids exposure of the stem cells to an alkylating agent, allowing rapid count recovery. Here, the two-step platform is described with a focus on key results from studies over the past two decades. Finally, this review details lessons learned and current strategies to optimize the graft-versus-tumor effect and limit transplant-related toxicities.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:27:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-83ed31b3982843328292c4b6685a1505
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-3224
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:27:20Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj.art-83ed31b3982843328292c4b6685a15052023-09-01T07:09:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242023-09-011410.3389/fimmu.2023.12377821237782The two-step approach to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationSikemi IbikunleDolores GrossoUsama GergisAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) provides the only potentially curative option for multiple hematological conditions. However, allogeneic HSCT outcomes rely on an optimal balance of effective immune recovery, minimal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and lasting control of disease. The quest to attain this balance has proven challenging over the past few decades. The two-step approach to HSCT was conceptualized and pioneered at Thomas Jefferson University in 2005 and remains the main platform for allografting at our institution. Following administration of the transplant conditioning regimen, patients receive a fixed dose of donor CD3+ cells (HSCT step one-DLI) as the lymphoid portion of the graft on day -6 with the aim of optimizing and controlling T cell dosing. Cyclophosphamide (CY) is administered after the DLI (days -3 and -2) to induce donor-recipient bidirectional tolerance. On day 0, a CD34-selected stem cell graft is given as the myeloid portion of the graft (step two). In this two-step approach, the stem cell graft is infused after CY tolerization, which avoids exposure of the stem cells to an alkylating agent, allowing rapid count recovery. Here, the two-step platform is described with a focus on key results from studies over the past two decades. Finally, this review details lessons learned and current strategies to optimize the graft-versus-tumor effect and limit transplant-related toxicities.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1237782/fulltwo-step approachhaploidenticalmatched relatedstem cell transplantationcyclophosphamide tolerization
spellingShingle Sikemi Ibikunle
Dolores Grosso
Usama Gergis
The two-step approach to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Frontiers in Immunology
two-step approach
haploidentical
matched related
stem cell transplantation
cyclophosphamide tolerization
title The two-step approach to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_full The two-step approach to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_fullStr The two-step approach to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_full_unstemmed The two-step approach to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_short The two-step approach to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_sort two step approach to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
topic two-step approach
haploidentical
matched related
stem cell transplantation
cyclophosphamide tolerization
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1237782/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sikemiibikunle thetwostepapproachtoallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT doloresgrosso thetwostepapproachtoallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT usamagergis thetwostepapproachtoallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT sikemiibikunle twostepapproachtoallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT doloresgrosso twostepapproachtoallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT usamagergis twostepapproachtoallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation