The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST

The imposition of corruption offense in case Number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/ JKT.PST, where the imposition of the offense of participation in acts of gratification is separated into two categories, namely those who give bribes and those who are bribed. It is unclear how the Judge differentiates those w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sariat Arifia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET) 2022-12-01
Series:JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.iicet.org/index.php/jppi/article/view/1694
_version_ 1797754102747234304
author Sariat Arifia
author_facet Sariat Arifia
author_sort Sariat Arifia
collection DOAJ
description The imposition of corruption offense in case Number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/ JKT.PST, where the imposition of the offense of participation in acts of gratification is separated into two categories, namely those who give bribes and those who are bribed. It is unclear how the Judge differentiates those who give bribes and those who are bribed. Thus, the research question is as follows: How is the implementation of participating in corruption cases in accordance with the case judgment number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST? Second, how is criminal behavior in corruption instances regulated in Indonesia? The research method employed is normative juridical, which means that it is based on an examination of pertinent laws and regulations. The study's conclusions include the absence of reason and logic in the judges' deliberations and decisions regarding the classification of bribery in case number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/ JKT.PST. Second, there is a legal vacuum or loophole in which no rules have a clear formula for classifying those who give bribes or those who are bribed. According to these two results, the regulation of participation in criminal acts of corruption still need conceptual and technical refinement in the future
first_indexed 2024-03-12T17:28:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-83f1385476e64b87af0c2cbd4b87d866
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2477-8524
2502-8103
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T17:28:40Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET)
record_format Article
series JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)
spelling doaj.art-83f1385476e64b87af0c2cbd4b87d8662023-08-05T04:58:12ZengIndonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET)JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)2477-85242502-81032022-12-01841007101310.29210/0202216941129The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PSTSariat Arifia0University of Al Azhar IndonesiaThe imposition of corruption offense in case Number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/ JKT.PST, where the imposition of the offense of participation in acts of gratification is separated into two categories, namely those who give bribes and those who are bribed. It is unclear how the Judge differentiates those who give bribes and those who are bribed. Thus, the research question is as follows: How is the implementation of participating in corruption cases in accordance with the case judgment number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST? Second, how is criminal behavior in corruption instances regulated in Indonesia? The research method employed is normative juridical, which means that it is based on an examination of pertinent laws and regulations. The study's conclusions include the absence of reason and logic in the judges' deliberations and decisions regarding the classification of bribery in case number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/ JKT.PST. Second, there is a legal vacuum or loophole in which no rules have a clear formula for classifying those who give bribes or those who are bribed. According to these two results, the regulation of participation in criminal acts of corruption still need conceptual and technical refinement in the futurehttps://jurnal.iicet.org/index.php/jppi/article/view/1694accomplice, deelneming, corruption, judges' legal decision making, deductive legal reasoning method.
spellingShingle Sariat Arifia
The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST
JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)
accomplice, deelneming, corruption, judges' legal decision making, deductive legal reasoning method.
title The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST
title_full The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST
title_fullStr The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST
title_full_unstemmed The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST
title_short The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST
title_sort imposition of corruption criminal acts handling corruption cases in indonesia number 28 pid sus tpk 2020 jkt pst
topic accomplice, deelneming, corruption, judges' legal decision making, deductive legal reasoning method.
url https://jurnal.iicet.org/index.php/jppi/article/view/1694
work_keys_str_mv AT sariatarifia theimpositionofcorruptioncriminalactshandlingcorruptioncasesinindonesianumber28pidsustpk2020jktpst
AT sariatarifia impositionofcorruptioncriminalactshandlingcorruptioncasesinindonesianumber28pidsustpk2020jktpst