The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST
The imposition of corruption offense in case Number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/ JKT.PST, where the imposition of the offense of participation in acts of gratification is separated into two categories, namely those who give bribes and those who are bribed. It is unclear how the Judge differentiates those w...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET)
2022-12-01
|
Series: | JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jurnal.iicet.org/index.php/jppi/article/view/1694 |
_version_ | 1797754102747234304 |
---|---|
author | Sariat Arifia |
author_facet | Sariat Arifia |
author_sort | Sariat Arifia |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The imposition of corruption offense in case Number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/ JKT.PST, where the imposition of the offense of participation in acts of gratification is separated into two categories, namely those who give bribes and those who are bribed. It is unclear how the Judge differentiates those who give bribes and those who are bribed. Thus, the research question is as follows: How is the implementation of participating in corruption cases in accordance with the case judgment number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST? Second, how is criminal behavior in corruption instances regulated in Indonesia? The research method employed is normative juridical, which means that it is based on an examination of pertinent laws and regulations. The study's conclusions include the absence of reason and logic in the judges' deliberations and decisions regarding the classification of bribery in case number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/ JKT.PST. Second, there is a legal vacuum or loophole in which no rules have a clear formula for classifying those who give bribes or those who are bribed. According to these two results, the regulation of participation in criminal acts of corruption still need conceptual and technical refinement in the future |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T17:28:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-83f1385476e64b87af0c2cbd4b87d866 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2477-8524 2502-8103 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T17:28:40Z |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET) |
record_format | Article |
series | JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) |
spelling | doaj.art-83f1385476e64b87af0c2cbd4b87d8662023-08-05T04:58:12ZengIndonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET)JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)2477-85242502-81032022-12-01841007101310.29210/0202216941129The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PSTSariat Arifia0University of Al Azhar IndonesiaThe imposition of corruption offense in case Number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/ JKT.PST, where the imposition of the offense of participation in acts of gratification is separated into two categories, namely those who give bribes and those who are bribed. It is unclear how the Judge differentiates those who give bribes and those who are bribed. Thus, the research question is as follows: How is the implementation of participating in corruption cases in accordance with the case judgment number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST? Second, how is criminal behavior in corruption instances regulated in Indonesia? The research method employed is normative juridical, which means that it is based on an examination of pertinent laws and regulations. The study's conclusions include the absence of reason and logic in the judges' deliberations and decisions regarding the classification of bribery in case number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/ JKT.PST. Second, there is a legal vacuum or loophole in which no rules have a clear formula for classifying those who give bribes or those who are bribed. According to these two results, the regulation of participation in criminal acts of corruption still need conceptual and technical refinement in the futurehttps://jurnal.iicet.org/index.php/jppi/article/view/1694accomplice, deelneming, corruption, judges' legal decision making, deductive legal reasoning method. |
spellingShingle | Sariat Arifia The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) accomplice, deelneming, corruption, judges' legal decision making, deductive legal reasoning method. |
title | The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST |
title_full | The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST |
title_fullStr | The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST |
title_full_unstemmed | The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST |
title_short | The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST |
title_sort | imposition of corruption criminal acts handling corruption cases in indonesia number 28 pid sus tpk 2020 jkt pst |
topic | accomplice, deelneming, corruption, judges' legal decision making, deductive legal reasoning method. |
url | https://jurnal.iicet.org/index.php/jppi/article/view/1694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sariatarifia theimpositionofcorruptioncriminalactshandlingcorruptioncasesinindonesianumber28pidsustpk2020jktpst AT sariatarifia impositionofcorruptioncriminalactshandlingcorruptioncasesinindonesianumber28pidsustpk2020jktpst |