The Role of Pain-Related Beliefs in Adjustment to Cancer Pain

Although evidence from chronic non-cancer pain population supports the role of pain-related beliefs in patients’ adjustment to chronic pain, little has been known about the impact of pain-related beliefs in the adjustment to cancer pain. This study examined the factor structure, reliability and vali...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M.A. Asghari, N. Karimzadeh, P. Emarlow
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Shahed University 2005-11-01
Series:روانشناسی بالینی و شخصیت
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cpap.shahed.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-142&slc_lang=en&sid=1
_version_ 1818700941310820352
author M.A. Asghari
N. Karimzadeh
P. Emarlow
author_facet M.A. Asghari
N. Karimzadeh
P. Emarlow
author_sort M.A. Asghari
collection DOAJ
description Although evidence from chronic non-cancer pain population supports the role of pain-related beliefs in patients’ adjustment to chronic pain, little has been known about the impact of pain-related beliefs in the adjustment to cancer pain. This study examined the factor structure, reliability and validity of the Pain Beliefs and Perception Inventory among a sample of 232 cancer patients undergoing treatment for cancer at the Institute of Cancer in Tehran. A factor analysis supported 4 factors. Factor one, Pain Permanence, consists of 4 items addresses the beliefs that pain will not change in the future. Factor two, Self-Blame consists of 3 items and reflects the patients’ beliefs that they are the appropriate target for blame for their pain experience. Factor three, Pain Stability, consists of 4 items and taps into the belief that pain is quite stable and present all the time and factor four, Mysteriousness, consists of 4 items and addresses the belief that pain is an aversive event that is poorly understood. These factors had satisfactory reliability (internal consistency) the Chronbach’s alphas for the subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.77. These factors were then correlated with averages of pain intensity and pain interference with daily activities as well as with some measures of general health indices. Higher scores on each belief were positively and significantly associated with more severe pain and higher levels of pain interference. Also, higher scores on Pain Constancy, Pain Permanence and Mysteriousness were significantly associated with some, but not all general health indexes. Multiple hierarchical regression analyses revealed that stronger belief on Pain Stability was an independent and significant predictor of the severity of pain and pain interference after controlling for the possible confounding effects of age of the patients. Also, stronger belief in Pain Stability was an independent and significant predictor of Bodily pain, General Health and Vitality stronger belief in Pain Permanence was an independent and significant predictor of General Health and stronger belief on pain as a mystery was an independent and significant and predictor of weaker General and Mental Health conditions. These findings are particularly significant because the relationships were controlled for the possible effects of patients’ pain severity. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T15:12:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-83f4f7f804014f50ac7bc02da0f2d3b2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2345-2188
2345-4784
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-17T15:12:56Z
publishDate 2005-11-01
publisher Shahed University
record_format Article
series روانشناسی بالینی و شخصیت
spelling doaj.art-83f4f7f804014f50ac7bc02da0f2d3b22022-12-21T21:43:37ZfasShahed Universityروانشناسی بالینی و شخصیت2345-21882345-47842005-11-01113122The Role of Pain-Related Beliefs in Adjustment to Cancer PainM.A. Asghari0N. Karimzadeh1P. Emarlow2 Shahed University Although evidence from chronic non-cancer pain population supports the role of pain-related beliefs in patients’ adjustment to chronic pain, little has been known about the impact of pain-related beliefs in the adjustment to cancer pain. This study examined the factor structure, reliability and validity of the Pain Beliefs and Perception Inventory among a sample of 232 cancer patients undergoing treatment for cancer at the Institute of Cancer in Tehran. A factor analysis supported 4 factors. Factor one, Pain Permanence, consists of 4 items addresses the beliefs that pain will not change in the future. Factor two, Self-Blame consists of 3 items and reflects the patients’ beliefs that they are the appropriate target for blame for their pain experience. Factor three, Pain Stability, consists of 4 items and taps into the belief that pain is quite stable and present all the time and factor four, Mysteriousness, consists of 4 items and addresses the belief that pain is an aversive event that is poorly understood. These factors had satisfactory reliability (internal consistency) the Chronbach’s alphas for the subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.77. These factors were then correlated with averages of pain intensity and pain interference with daily activities as well as with some measures of general health indices. Higher scores on each belief were positively and significantly associated with more severe pain and higher levels of pain interference. Also, higher scores on Pain Constancy, Pain Permanence and Mysteriousness were significantly associated with some, but not all general health indexes. Multiple hierarchical regression analyses revealed that stronger belief on Pain Stability was an independent and significant predictor of the severity of pain and pain interference after controlling for the possible confounding effects of age of the patients. Also, stronger belief in Pain Stability was an independent and significant predictor of Bodily pain, General Health and Vitality stronger belief in Pain Permanence was an independent and significant predictor of General Health and stronger belief on pain as a mystery was an independent and significant and predictor of weaker General and Mental Health conditions. These findings are particularly significant because the relationships were controlled for the possible effects of patients’ pain severity. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.http://cpap.shahed.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-142&slc_lang=en&sid=1Pain-related beliefs Cancer pain Interference Pain intensity Adjustment
spellingShingle M.A. Asghari
N. Karimzadeh
P. Emarlow
The Role of Pain-Related Beliefs in Adjustment to Cancer Pain
روانشناسی بالینی و شخصیت
Pain-related beliefs
Cancer pain
Interference
Pain intensity
Adjustment
title The Role of Pain-Related Beliefs in Adjustment to Cancer Pain
title_full The Role of Pain-Related Beliefs in Adjustment to Cancer Pain
title_fullStr The Role of Pain-Related Beliefs in Adjustment to Cancer Pain
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Pain-Related Beliefs in Adjustment to Cancer Pain
title_short The Role of Pain-Related Beliefs in Adjustment to Cancer Pain
title_sort role of pain related beliefs in adjustment to cancer pain
topic Pain-related beliefs
Cancer pain
Interference
Pain intensity
Adjustment
url http://cpap.shahed.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-142&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT maasghari theroleofpainrelatedbeliefsinadjustmenttocancerpain
AT nkarimzadeh theroleofpainrelatedbeliefsinadjustmenttocancerpain
AT pemarlow theroleofpainrelatedbeliefsinadjustmenttocancerpain
AT maasghari roleofpainrelatedbeliefsinadjustmenttocancerpain
AT nkarimzadeh roleofpainrelatedbeliefsinadjustmenttocancerpain
AT pemarlow roleofpainrelatedbeliefsinadjustmenttocancerpain