Higher education between massification and quality
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine how the policy of massification as a characteristic of the higher education system influences the quality of education? and what higher education model can the authors adopt to reconcile flow and quality? Design/methodology/approach – The methodology...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Emerald Publishing
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Higher Education Evaluation and Development |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/HEED-04-2020-0008/full/pdf |
| _version_ | 1827920861247569920 |
|---|---|
| author | Rabah Noui |
| author_facet | Rabah Noui |
| author_sort | Rabah Noui |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine how the policy of massification as a characteristic of the higher education system influences the quality of education? and what higher education model can the authors adopt to reconcile flow and quality? Design/methodology/approach – The methodology adopted is based on a questionnaire survey of a population of young graduates divided between graduates with a conventional license and LMD license, either in the process of preparing for a diploma or in unemployment or work. But also, the qualitative dimension which, although secondary in this survey, the authors mobilized it through the analysis of open questions relating to the perceptions and representations that young graduates have of their situations. Findings – The higher education reforms are perceived differently by higher education actors. The results found show that university massification has had the opposite effect by training graduates doomed to unemployment and expatriation. Research limitations/implications – The sample for this study is very limited, the results of this finding cannot be generalized to the entire university student as a whole. Originality/value – This study emphasizes the duality of flow and quality in higher education. The authors have shown the different perceptions of stakeholders in higher education and that despite the multiple reforms of this system the authors still cannot find the best model. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T04:18:51Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-83faede40ede41ac89ce619d7250110f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2514-5789 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T04:18:51Z |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | Emerald Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Higher Education Evaluation and Development |
| spelling | doaj.art-83faede40ede41ac89ce619d7250110f2023-06-20T16:41:39ZengEmerald PublishingHigher Education Evaluation and Development2514-57892020-12-011429310310.1108/HEED-04-2020-0008Higher education between massification and qualityRabah Noui0Social sciences, University of Bejaia, Bejaia, AlgeriaPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine how the policy of massification as a characteristic of the higher education system influences the quality of education? and what higher education model can the authors adopt to reconcile flow and quality? Design/methodology/approach – The methodology adopted is based on a questionnaire survey of a population of young graduates divided between graduates with a conventional license and LMD license, either in the process of preparing for a diploma or in unemployment or work. But also, the qualitative dimension which, although secondary in this survey, the authors mobilized it through the analysis of open questions relating to the perceptions and representations that young graduates have of their situations. Findings – The higher education reforms are perceived differently by higher education actors. The results found show that university massification has had the opposite effect by training graduates doomed to unemployment and expatriation. Research limitations/implications – The sample for this study is very limited, the results of this finding cannot be generalized to the entire university student as a whole. Originality/value – This study emphasizes the duality of flow and quality in higher education. The authors have shown the different perceptions of stakeholders in higher education and that despite the multiple reforms of this system the authors still cannot find the best model.https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/HEED-04-2020-0008/full/pdfSocial science studentsHigher educationReformsMassificationQualityFlow |
| spellingShingle | Rabah Noui Higher education between massification and quality Higher Education Evaluation and Development Social science students Higher education Reforms Massification Quality Flow |
| title | Higher education between massification and quality |
| title_full | Higher education between massification and quality |
| title_fullStr | Higher education between massification and quality |
| title_full_unstemmed | Higher education between massification and quality |
| title_short | Higher education between massification and quality |
| title_sort | higher education between massification and quality |
| topic | Social science students Higher education Reforms Massification Quality Flow |
| url | https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/HEED-04-2020-0008/full/pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rabahnoui highereducationbetweenmassificationandquality |