Utilising identifier error variation in linkage of large administrative data sources

Abstract Background Linkage of administrative data sources often relies on probabilistic methods using a set of common identifiers (e.g. sex, date of birth, postcode). Variation in data quality on an individual or organisational level (e.g. by hospital) can result in clustering of identifier errors,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katie Harron, Gareth Hagger-Johnson, Ruth Gilbert, Harvey Goldstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-02-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0306-8
_version_ 1818548109192462336
author Katie Harron
Gareth Hagger-Johnson
Ruth Gilbert
Harvey Goldstein
author_facet Katie Harron
Gareth Hagger-Johnson
Ruth Gilbert
Harvey Goldstein
author_sort Katie Harron
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Linkage of administrative data sources often relies on probabilistic methods using a set of common identifiers (e.g. sex, date of birth, postcode). Variation in data quality on an individual or organisational level (e.g. by hospital) can result in clustering of identifier errors, violating the assumption of independence between identifiers required for traditional probabilistic match weight estimation. This potentially introduces selection bias to the resulting linked dataset. We aimed to measure variation in identifier error rates in a large English administrative data source (Hospital Episode Statistics; HES) and to incorporate this information into match weight calculation. Methods We used 30,000 randomly selected HES hospital admissions records of patients aged 0–1, 5–6 and 18–19 years, for 2011/2012, linked via NHS number with data from the Personal Demographic Service (PDS; our gold-standard). We calculated identifier error rates for sex, date of birth and postcode and used multi-level logistic regression to investigate associations with individual-level attributes (age, ethnicity, and gender) and organisational variation. We then derived: i) weights incorporating dependence between identifiers; ii) attribute-specific weights (varying by age, ethnicity and gender); and iii) organisation-specific weights (by hospital). Results were compared with traditional match weights using a simulation study. Results Identifier errors (where values disagreed in linked HES-PDS records) or missing values were found in 0.11% of records for sex and date of birth and in 53% of records for postcode. Identifier error rates differed significantly by age, ethnicity and sex (p < 0.0005). Errors were less frequent in males, in 5–6 year olds and 18–19 year olds compared with infants, and were lowest for the Asian ethic group. A simulation study demonstrated that substantial bias was introduced into estimated readmission rates in the presence of identifier errors. Attribute- and organisational-specific weights reduced this bias compared with weights estimated using traditional probabilistic matching algorithms. Conclusions We provide empirical evidence on variation in rates of identifier error in a widely-used administrative data source and propose a new method for deriving match weights that incorporates additional data attributes. Our results demonstrate that incorporating information on variation by individual-level characteristics can help to reduce bias due to linkage error.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T08:15:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-83fb11d307004f11af251a60bdd8083a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2288
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T08:15:33Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj.art-83fb11d307004f11af251a60bdd8083a2022-12-22T00:31:37ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882017-02-011711910.1186/s12874-017-0306-8Utilising identifier error variation in linkage of large administrative data sourcesKatie Harron0Gareth Hagger-Johnson1Ruth Gilbert2Harvey Goldstein3London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineAdministrative Data Research Centre for England, UCLAdministrative Data Research Centre for England and UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity of Bristol, Administrative Data Research Centre for England and UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthAbstract Background Linkage of administrative data sources often relies on probabilistic methods using a set of common identifiers (e.g. sex, date of birth, postcode). Variation in data quality on an individual or organisational level (e.g. by hospital) can result in clustering of identifier errors, violating the assumption of independence between identifiers required for traditional probabilistic match weight estimation. This potentially introduces selection bias to the resulting linked dataset. We aimed to measure variation in identifier error rates in a large English administrative data source (Hospital Episode Statistics; HES) and to incorporate this information into match weight calculation. Methods We used 30,000 randomly selected HES hospital admissions records of patients aged 0–1, 5–6 and 18–19 years, for 2011/2012, linked via NHS number with data from the Personal Demographic Service (PDS; our gold-standard). We calculated identifier error rates for sex, date of birth and postcode and used multi-level logistic regression to investigate associations with individual-level attributes (age, ethnicity, and gender) and organisational variation. We then derived: i) weights incorporating dependence between identifiers; ii) attribute-specific weights (varying by age, ethnicity and gender); and iii) organisation-specific weights (by hospital). Results were compared with traditional match weights using a simulation study. Results Identifier errors (where values disagreed in linked HES-PDS records) or missing values were found in 0.11% of records for sex and date of birth and in 53% of records for postcode. Identifier error rates differed significantly by age, ethnicity and sex (p < 0.0005). Errors were less frequent in males, in 5–6 year olds and 18–19 year olds compared with infants, and were lowest for the Asian ethic group. A simulation study demonstrated that substantial bias was introduced into estimated readmission rates in the presence of identifier errors. Attribute- and organisational-specific weights reduced this bias compared with weights estimated using traditional probabilistic matching algorithms. Conclusions We provide empirical evidence on variation in rates of identifier error in a widely-used administrative data source and propose a new method for deriving match weights that incorporates additional data attributes. Our results demonstrate that incorporating information on variation by individual-level characteristics can help to reduce bias due to linkage error.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0306-8Data linkageRecord linkageAdministrative dataLinkage errorLinkage evaluationHospital admission
spellingShingle Katie Harron
Gareth Hagger-Johnson
Ruth Gilbert
Harvey Goldstein
Utilising identifier error variation in linkage of large administrative data sources
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Data linkage
Record linkage
Administrative data
Linkage error
Linkage evaluation
Hospital admission
title Utilising identifier error variation in linkage of large administrative data sources
title_full Utilising identifier error variation in linkage of large administrative data sources
title_fullStr Utilising identifier error variation in linkage of large administrative data sources
title_full_unstemmed Utilising identifier error variation in linkage of large administrative data sources
title_short Utilising identifier error variation in linkage of large administrative data sources
title_sort utilising identifier error variation in linkage of large administrative data sources
topic Data linkage
Record linkage
Administrative data
Linkage error
Linkage evaluation
Hospital admission
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0306-8
work_keys_str_mv AT katieharron utilisingidentifiererrorvariationinlinkageoflargeadministrativedatasources
AT garethhaggerjohnson utilisingidentifiererrorvariationinlinkageoflargeadministrativedatasources
AT ruthgilbert utilisingidentifiererrorvariationinlinkageoflargeadministrativedatasources
AT harveygoldstein utilisingidentifiererrorvariationinlinkageoflargeadministrativedatasources