Linking new information to a reactivated memory requires consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms.
A new memory is initially labile and becomes stabilized through a process of consolidation, which depends on gene expression. Stable memories, however, can again become labile if reactivated by recall and require another phase of protein synthesis in order to be maintained. This process is known as...
| Format: | Article |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2005-09-01
|
| Series: | PLoS Biology |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030293 |
| _version_ | 1818999267767877632 |
|---|---|
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | A new memory is initially labile and becomes stabilized through a process of consolidation, which depends on gene expression. Stable memories, however, can again become labile if reactivated by recall and require another phase of protein synthesis in order to be maintained. This process is known as reconsolidation. The functional significance of the labile phase of reconsolidation is unknown; one hypothesis proposes that it is required to link new information with reactivated memories. Reconsolidation is distinct from the initial consolidation, and one distinction is that the requirement for specific proteins or general protein synthesis during the two processes occurs in different brain areas. Here, we identified an anatomically distinctive molecular requirement that doubly dissociates consolidation from reconsolidation of an inhibitory avoidance memory. We then used this requirement to investigate whether reconsolidation and consolidation are involved in linking new information with reactivated memories. In contrast to what the hypothesis predicted, we found that reconsolidation does not contribute to the formation of an association between new and reactivated information. Instead, it recruits mechanisms similar to those underlying consolidation of a new memory. Thus, linking new information to a reactivated memory is mediated by consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T22:14:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8414be798c5d4feea2de90f75ae055f0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1544-9173 1545-7885 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T22:14:43Z |
| publishDate | 2005-09-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS Biology |
| spelling | doaj.art-8414be798c5d4feea2de90f75ae055f02022-12-21T19:25:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Biology1544-91731545-78852005-09-0139e293Linking new information to a reactivated memory requires consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms.A new memory is initially labile and becomes stabilized through a process of consolidation, which depends on gene expression. Stable memories, however, can again become labile if reactivated by recall and require another phase of protein synthesis in order to be maintained. This process is known as reconsolidation. The functional significance of the labile phase of reconsolidation is unknown; one hypothesis proposes that it is required to link new information with reactivated memories. Reconsolidation is distinct from the initial consolidation, and one distinction is that the requirement for specific proteins or general protein synthesis during the two processes occurs in different brain areas. Here, we identified an anatomically distinctive molecular requirement that doubly dissociates consolidation from reconsolidation of an inhibitory avoidance memory. We then used this requirement to investigate whether reconsolidation and consolidation are involved in linking new information with reactivated memories. In contrast to what the hypothesis predicted, we found that reconsolidation does not contribute to the formation of an association between new and reactivated information. Instead, it recruits mechanisms similar to those underlying consolidation of a new memory. Thus, linking new information to a reactivated memory is mediated by consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms.http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030293 |
| spellingShingle | Linking new information to a reactivated memory requires consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms. PLoS Biology |
| title | Linking new information to a reactivated memory requires consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms. |
| title_full | Linking new information to a reactivated memory requires consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms. |
| title_fullStr | Linking new information to a reactivated memory requires consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Linking new information to a reactivated memory requires consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms. |
| title_short | Linking new information to a reactivated memory requires consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms. |
| title_sort | linking new information to a reactivated memory requires consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030293 |