Can the Supido Radar Be Used for Measuring Ball Speed during Soccer Kicking? A Reliability and Concurrent Validity Study of a New Low-Cost Device

The aim was to analyze the reliability and validity of a low-cost instrument, based on a radar system, to quantify the kicking ball speed in soccer. A group of 153 male soccer players (under-13, n = 53; under-15, n = 54; under-18, n = 46) participated in this study. Each player performed three kicks...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David M. Díez-Fernández, David Rodríguez-Rosell, Federico Gazzo, Julián Giráldez, Rodrigo Villaseca-Vicuña, Jose A. Gonzalez-Jurado
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/18/7046
_version_ 1827656766906695680
author David M. Díez-Fernández
David Rodríguez-Rosell
Federico Gazzo
Julián Giráldez
Rodrigo Villaseca-Vicuña
Jose A. Gonzalez-Jurado
author_facet David M. Díez-Fernández
David Rodríguez-Rosell
Federico Gazzo
Julián Giráldez
Rodrigo Villaseca-Vicuña
Jose A. Gonzalez-Jurado
author_sort David M. Díez-Fernández
collection DOAJ
description The aim was to analyze the reliability and validity of a low-cost instrument, based on a radar system, to quantify the kicking ball speed in soccer. A group of 153 male soccer players (under-13, n = 53; under-15, n = 54; under-18, n = 46) participated in this study. Each player performed three kicks on the goal in a standardized condition while the ball speed was measured with three different devices: one Radar Stalker ATS II<sup>®</sup> (reference criterion) and two Supido Radar<sup>®</sup> (Supido-front of the goal and Supido-back of the goal). The standard error of measurement (SEM) expressed as a coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were employed for assessing the reliability of each instrument. Stalker and Supido-back showed very high absolute (CV = 4.0–5.4%) and relative (ICC = 0.945–0.958) reliability, whereas Supido-front resulted in moderate to low reliability scores (CV = 7.4–15%, ICC = 0.134–0.693). In addition, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) values revealed an ‘almost perfect’ agreement between Stalker and Supido-back for the average (r = 0.99) and maximal (r = 0.98) ball speed, regardless of the ball speed range analyzed. However, Supido-front resulted in a poor degree of concordance (CCC = 0.688) and a high magnitude of error (17.0–37.5 km·h<sup>−1</sup>) with the reference Stalker radar gun. The Supido Radar<sup>®</sup> placed behind the goal could be considered a reliable and valid device for measuring ball speed in soccer.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:32:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-841ab549312d44f483969ceef1daa98f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:32:58Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-841ab549312d44f483969ceef1daa98f2023-11-23T18:53:36ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202022-09-012218704610.3390/s22187046Can the Supido Radar Be Used for Measuring Ball Speed during Soccer Kicking? A Reliability and Concurrent Validity Study of a New Low-Cost DeviceDavid M. Díez-Fernández0David Rodríguez-Rosell1Federico Gazzo2Julián Giráldez3Rodrigo Villaseca-Vicuña4Jose A. Gonzalez-Jurado5Department of Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, SpainResearch, Development, and Innovation (R&D+I) Area, Investigation in Medicine and Sport Department, Sevilla Football Club, 41005 Seville, SpainPhysical Performance & Sports Research Center, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Seville, SpainPhysical Performance & Sports Research Center, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Seville, SpainEscuela de Ciencias de la Educación y Tecnología de Pedagogía en Educación Física, Universidad Católica, Silva Henríquez (UCSH), Santiago 8330225, ChileDepartment of Sport and Informatics, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Seville, SpainThe aim was to analyze the reliability and validity of a low-cost instrument, based on a radar system, to quantify the kicking ball speed in soccer. A group of 153 male soccer players (under-13, n = 53; under-15, n = 54; under-18, n = 46) participated in this study. Each player performed three kicks on the goal in a standardized condition while the ball speed was measured with three different devices: one Radar Stalker ATS II<sup>®</sup> (reference criterion) and two Supido Radar<sup>®</sup> (Supido-front of the goal and Supido-back of the goal). The standard error of measurement (SEM) expressed as a coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were employed for assessing the reliability of each instrument. Stalker and Supido-back showed very high absolute (CV = 4.0–5.4%) and relative (ICC = 0.945–0.958) reliability, whereas Supido-front resulted in moderate to low reliability scores (CV = 7.4–15%, ICC = 0.134–0.693). In addition, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) values revealed an ‘almost perfect’ agreement between Stalker and Supido-back for the average (r = 0.99) and maximal (r = 0.98) ball speed, regardless of the ball speed range analyzed. However, Supido-front resulted in a poor degree of concordance (CCC = 0.688) and a high magnitude of error (17.0–37.5 km·h<sup>−1</sup>) with the reference Stalker radar gun. The Supido Radar<sup>®</sup> placed behind the goal could be considered a reliable and valid device for measuring ball speed in soccer.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/18/7046radaragreementconcordancephysical performancereproducibilitykicking ball speed
spellingShingle David M. Díez-Fernández
David Rodríguez-Rosell
Federico Gazzo
Julián Giráldez
Rodrigo Villaseca-Vicuña
Jose A. Gonzalez-Jurado
Can the Supido Radar Be Used for Measuring Ball Speed during Soccer Kicking? A Reliability and Concurrent Validity Study of a New Low-Cost Device
Sensors
radar
agreement
concordance
physical performance
reproducibility
kicking ball speed
title Can the Supido Radar Be Used for Measuring Ball Speed during Soccer Kicking? A Reliability and Concurrent Validity Study of a New Low-Cost Device
title_full Can the Supido Radar Be Used for Measuring Ball Speed during Soccer Kicking? A Reliability and Concurrent Validity Study of a New Low-Cost Device
title_fullStr Can the Supido Radar Be Used for Measuring Ball Speed during Soccer Kicking? A Reliability and Concurrent Validity Study of a New Low-Cost Device
title_full_unstemmed Can the Supido Radar Be Used for Measuring Ball Speed during Soccer Kicking? A Reliability and Concurrent Validity Study of a New Low-Cost Device
title_short Can the Supido Radar Be Used for Measuring Ball Speed during Soccer Kicking? A Reliability and Concurrent Validity Study of a New Low-Cost Device
title_sort can the supido radar be used for measuring ball speed during soccer kicking a reliability and concurrent validity study of a new low cost device
topic radar
agreement
concordance
physical performance
reproducibility
kicking ball speed
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/18/7046
work_keys_str_mv AT davidmdiezfernandez canthesupidoradarbeusedformeasuringballspeedduringsoccerkickingareliabilityandconcurrentvaliditystudyofanewlowcostdevice
AT davidrodriguezrosell canthesupidoradarbeusedformeasuringballspeedduringsoccerkickingareliabilityandconcurrentvaliditystudyofanewlowcostdevice
AT federicogazzo canthesupidoradarbeusedformeasuringballspeedduringsoccerkickingareliabilityandconcurrentvaliditystudyofanewlowcostdevice
AT juliangiraldez canthesupidoradarbeusedformeasuringballspeedduringsoccerkickingareliabilityandconcurrentvaliditystudyofanewlowcostdevice
AT rodrigovillasecavicuna canthesupidoradarbeusedformeasuringballspeedduringsoccerkickingareliabilityandconcurrentvaliditystudyofanewlowcostdevice
AT joseagonzalezjurado canthesupidoradarbeusedformeasuringballspeedduringsoccerkickingareliabilityandconcurrentvaliditystudyofanewlowcostdevice