Reporting science and conflicts of interest in the lay press.

<h4>Background</h4>Forthright reporting of financial ties and conflicts of interest of researchers is associated with public trust in and esteem for the scientific enterprise.<h4>Methods/principal findings</h4>We searched Lexis/Nexis Academic News for the top news stories in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel M Cook, Elizabeth A Boyd, Claudia Grossmann, Lisa A Bero
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2007-12-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001266
Description
Summary:<h4>Background</h4>Forthright reporting of financial ties and conflicts of interest of researchers is associated with public trust in and esteem for the scientific enterprise.<h4>Methods/principal findings</h4>We searched Lexis/Nexis Academic News for the top news stories in science published in 2004 and 2005. We conducted a content analysis of 1152 newspaper stories. Funders of the research were identified in 38% of stories, financial ties of the researchers were reported in 11% of stories, and 5% reported financial ties of sources quoted. Of 73 stories not reporting on financial ties, 27% had financial ties publicly disclosed in scholarly journals.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Because science journalists often did not report conflict of interest information, adherence to gold-standard recommendations for science journalism was low. Journalists work under many different constraints, but nonetheless news reports of scientific research were incomplete, potentially eroding public trust in science.
ISSN:1932-6203