How external and agency characteristics are related to coordination in homecare – findings of the national multicenter, cross-sectional SPOTnat study

Abstract Background Homecare client services are often distributed across several interdependent healthcare providers, making proper care coordination essential. However, as studies exploring care coordination in the homecare setting are scarce, serious knowledge gaps exist regarding how various fac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathalie Möckli, Michael Simon, Kris Denhaerynck, Diana Trutschel, Tania Martins, Carla Meyer-Massetti, Franziska Zúñiga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-03-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10751-4
_version_ 1797247411390775296
author Nathalie Möckli
Michael Simon
Kris Denhaerynck
Diana Trutschel
Tania Martins
Carla Meyer-Massetti
Franziska Zúñiga
author_facet Nathalie Möckli
Michael Simon
Kris Denhaerynck
Diana Trutschel
Tania Martins
Carla Meyer-Massetti
Franziska Zúñiga
author_sort Nathalie Möckli
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Homecare client services are often distributed across several interdependent healthcare providers, making proper care coordination essential. However, as studies exploring care coordination in the homecare setting are scarce, serious knowledge gaps exist regarding how various factors influence coordination in this care sector. To fill such gaps, this study’s central aim was to explore how external factors (i.e., financial and regulatory mechanisms) and homecare agency characteristics (i.e., work environment, workforce, and client characteristics) are related to care coordination in homecare. Methods This analysis was part of a national multicentre, cross-sectional study in the Swiss homecare setting that included a stratified random sample of 88 Swiss homecare agencies. Data were collected between January and September 2021 through agency and employee questionnaires. Using our newly developed care coordination framework, COORA, we modelled our variables to assess the relevant components of care coordination on the structural, process, and outcome levels. We conducted both descriptive and multilevel regression analyses—with the latter adjusting for dependencies within agencies—to explore which key factors are associated with coordination. Results The final sample size consisted of 1450 employees of 71 homecare agencies. We found that one explicit coordination mechanism (“communication and information exchange” (beta = 0.10, p <.001)) and four implicit coordination mechanisms—“knowledge of the health system” (beta = -0.07, p <.01), “role clarity” (beta = 0.07, p <.001), “mutual respect and trust” (beta = 0.07, p <.001), and “accountability, predictability, common perspective” (beta = 0.19, p <.001)—were significantly positively associated with employee-perceived coordination. We also found that the effects of agency characteristics and external factors were mediated through coordination processes. Conclusion Implicit coordination mechanisms, which enable and enhance team communication, require closer examination. While developing strategies to strengthen implicit mechanisms, the involvement of the entire care team is vital to create structures (i.e., explicit mechanisms) that enable communication and information exchange. Appropriate coordination processes seem to mitigate the association between staffing and coordination. This suggests that they support coordination even when workload and overtime are higher.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T19:58:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-841f5f7b3d0a4a6e916b3b1a06844c8d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:58:16Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-841f5f7b3d0a4a6e916b3b1a06844c8d2024-03-24T12:14:20ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632024-03-0124111810.1186/s12913-024-10751-4How external and agency characteristics are related to coordination in homecare – findings of the national multicenter, cross-sectional SPOTnat studyNathalie Möckli0Michael Simon1Kris Denhaerynck2Diana Trutschel3Tania Martins4Carla Meyer-Massetti5Franziska Zúñiga6Department of Public Health, Institute of Nursing ScienceDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing ScienceDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing ScienceDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing ScienceDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing ScienceClinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital – University Hospital BernDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing ScienceAbstract Background Homecare client services are often distributed across several interdependent healthcare providers, making proper care coordination essential. However, as studies exploring care coordination in the homecare setting are scarce, serious knowledge gaps exist regarding how various factors influence coordination in this care sector. To fill such gaps, this study’s central aim was to explore how external factors (i.e., financial and regulatory mechanisms) and homecare agency characteristics (i.e., work environment, workforce, and client characteristics) are related to care coordination in homecare. Methods This analysis was part of a national multicentre, cross-sectional study in the Swiss homecare setting that included a stratified random sample of 88 Swiss homecare agencies. Data were collected between January and September 2021 through agency and employee questionnaires. Using our newly developed care coordination framework, COORA, we modelled our variables to assess the relevant components of care coordination on the structural, process, and outcome levels. We conducted both descriptive and multilevel regression analyses—with the latter adjusting for dependencies within agencies—to explore which key factors are associated with coordination. Results The final sample size consisted of 1450 employees of 71 homecare agencies. We found that one explicit coordination mechanism (“communication and information exchange” (beta = 0.10, p <.001)) and four implicit coordination mechanisms—“knowledge of the health system” (beta = -0.07, p <.01), “role clarity” (beta = 0.07, p <.001), “mutual respect and trust” (beta = 0.07, p <.001), and “accountability, predictability, common perspective” (beta = 0.19, p <.001)—were significantly positively associated with employee-perceived coordination. We also found that the effects of agency characteristics and external factors were mediated through coordination processes. Conclusion Implicit coordination mechanisms, which enable and enhance team communication, require closer examination. While developing strategies to strengthen implicit mechanisms, the involvement of the entire care team is vital to create structures (i.e., explicit mechanisms) that enable communication and information exchange. Appropriate coordination processes seem to mitigate the association between staffing and coordination. This suggests that they support coordination even when workload and overtime are higher.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10751-4“Delivery of health care”[Mesh]“Government regulation”[Mesh]“Health services Research”[Mesh]“Healthcare financing”[Mesh]“Home care services”[Mesh]“Nursing administration research”[Mesh]
spellingShingle Nathalie Möckli
Michael Simon
Kris Denhaerynck
Diana Trutschel
Tania Martins
Carla Meyer-Massetti
Franziska Zúñiga
How external and agency characteristics are related to coordination in homecare – findings of the national multicenter, cross-sectional SPOTnat study
BMC Health Services Research
“Delivery of health care”[Mesh]
“Government regulation”[Mesh]
“Health services Research”[Mesh]
“Healthcare financing”[Mesh]
“Home care services”[Mesh]
“Nursing administration research”[Mesh]
title How external and agency characteristics are related to coordination in homecare – findings of the national multicenter, cross-sectional SPOTnat study
title_full How external and agency characteristics are related to coordination in homecare – findings of the national multicenter, cross-sectional SPOTnat study
title_fullStr How external and agency characteristics are related to coordination in homecare – findings of the national multicenter, cross-sectional SPOTnat study
title_full_unstemmed How external and agency characteristics are related to coordination in homecare – findings of the national multicenter, cross-sectional SPOTnat study
title_short How external and agency characteristics are related to coordination in homecare – findings of the national multicenter, cross-sectional SPOTnat study
title_sort how external and agency characteristics are related to coordination in homecare findings of the national multicenter cross sectional spotnat study
topic “Delivery of health care”[Mesh]
“Government regulation”[Mesh]
“Health services Research”[Mesh]
“Healthcare financing”[Mesh]
“Home care services”[Mesh]
“Nursing administration research”[Mesh]
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10751-4
work_keys_str_mv AT nathaliemockli howexternalandagencycharacteristicsarerelatedtocoordinationinhomecarefindingsofthenationalmulticentercrosssectionalspotnatstudy
AT michaelsimon howexternalandagencycharacteristicsarerelatedtocoordinationinhomecarefindingsofthenationalmulticentercrosssectionalspotnatstudy
AT krisdenhaerynck howexternalandagencycharacteristicsarerelatedtocoordinationinhomecarefindingsofthenationalmulticentercrosssectionalspotnatstudy
AT dianatrutschel howexternalandagencycharacteristicsarerelatedtocoordinationinhomecarefindingsofthenationalmulticentercrosssectionalspotnatstudy
AT taniamartins howexternalandagencycharacteristicsarerelatedtocoordinationinhomecarefindingsofthenationalmulticentercrosssectionalspotnatstudy
AT carlameyermassetti howexternalandagencycharacteristicsarerelatedtocoordinationinhomecarefindingsofthenationalmulticentercrosssectionalspotnatstudy
AT franziskazuniga howexternalandagencycharacteristicsarerelatedtocoordinationinhomecarefindingsofthenationalmulticentercrosssectionalspotnatstudy