Social evaluative implications of sensory adaptation to human voices

People form social evaluations of others following brief exposure to their voices, and these impressions are calibrated based on recent perceptual experience. Participants adapted to voices with fundamental frequency (f o; the acoustic correlate of perceptual pitch) manipulated to be gender-typical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kelsey L. Neuenswander, Grace S. R. Gillespie, David J. Lick, Gregory A. Bryant, Kerri L. Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2024-03-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.231348
_version_ 1797242759392788480
author Kelsey L. Neuenswander
Grace S. R. Gillespie
David J. Lick
Gregory A. Bryant
Kerri L. Johnson
author_facet Kelsey L. Neuenswander
Grace S. R. Gillespie
David J. Lick
Gregory A. Bryant
Kerri L. Johnson
author_sort Kelsey L. Neuenswander
collection DOAJ
description People form social evaluations of others following brief exposure to their voices, and these impressions are calibrated based on recent perceptual experience. Participants adapted to voices with fundamental frequency (f o; the acoustic correlate of perceptual pitch) manipulated to be gender-typical (i.e. masculine men and feminine women) or gender-atypical (i.e. feminine men and masculine women) before evaluating unaltered test voices within the same sex. Adaptation resulted in contrastive aftereffects. Listening to gender-atypical voices caused female voices to sound more feminine and attractive (Study 1) and male voices to sound more masculine and attractive (Study 2). Studies 3a and 3b tested whether adaptation occurred on a conceptual or perceptual level, respectively. In Study 3a, perceivers adapted to gender-typical or gender-atypical voices for both men and women (i.e. adaptors pitch manipulated in opposite directions for men and women) before evaluating unaltered test voices. Findings showed weak evidence that evaluations differed between conditions. In Study 3b, perceivers adapted to masculinized or feminized voices for both men and women (i.e. adaptors pitch manipulated in the same direction for men and women) before evaluating unaltered test voices. In the feminized condition, participants rated male targets as more masculine and attractive. Conversely, in the masculinized condition, participants rated female targets as more feminine and attractive. Voices appear to be evaluated according to gender norms that are updated based on perceptual experience as well as conceptual knowledge.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:44:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-841f68c6df1046ac906ebc9d9dde739a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2054-5703
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:44:19Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher The Royal Society
record_format Article
series Royal Society Open Science
spelling doaj.art-841f68c6df1046ac906ebc9d9dde739a2024-03-27T08:05:34ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032024-03-0111310.1098/rsos.231348Social evaluative implications of sensory adaptation to human voicesKelsey L. Neuenswander0Grace S. R. Gillespie1David J. Lick2Gregory A. Bryant3Kerri L. Johnson4Department of Communication, University of California , Los Angeles, CA 90095, USADepartment of Psychology, University of California , Los Angeles, CA, USAGoogle , New York City, NY, USADepartment of Communication, University of California , Los Angeles, CA 90095, USADepartment of Communication, University of California , Los Angeles, CA 90095, USAPeople form social evaluations of others following brief exposure to their voices, and these impressions are calibrated based on recent perceptual experience. Participants adapted to voices with fundamental frequency (f o; the acoustic correlate of perceptual pitch) manipulated to be gender-typical (i.e. masculine men and feminine women) or gender-atypical (i.e. feminine men and masculine women) before evaluating unaltered test voices within the same sex. Adaptation resulted in contrastive aftereffects. Listening to gender-atypical voices caused female voices to sound more feminine and attractive (Study 1) and male voices to sound more masculine and attractive (Study 2). Studies 3a and 3b tested whether adaptation occurred on a conceptual or perceptual level, respectively. In Study 3a, perceivers adapted to gender-typical or gender-atypical voices for both men and women (i.e. adaptors pitch manipulated in opposite directions for men and women) before evaluating unaltered test voices. Findings showed weak evidence that evaluations differed between conditions. In Study 3b, perceivers adapted to masculinized or feminized voices for both men and women (i.e. adaptors pitch manipulated in the same direction for men and women) before evaluating unaltered test voices. In the feminized condition, participants rated male targets as more masculine and attractive. Conversely, in the masculinized condition, participants rated female targets as more feminine and attractive. Voices appear to be evaluated according to gender norms that are updated based on perceptual experience as well as conceptual knowledge.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.231348sensory adaptationvocal characteristicsevaluative aftereffectsgender typicalityimpression formation
spellingShingle Kelsey L. Neuenswander
Grace S. R. Gillespie
David J. Lick
Gregory A. Bryant
Kerri L. Johnson
Social evaluative implications of sensory adaptation to human voices
Royal Society Open Science
sensory adaptation
vocal characteristics
evaluative aftereffects
gender typicality
impression formation
title Social evaluative implications of sensory adaptation to human voices
title_full Social evaluative implications of sensory adaptation to human voices
title_fullStr Social evaluative implications of sensory adaptation to human voices
title_full_unstemmed Social evaluative implications of sensory adaptation to human voices
title_short Social evaluative implications of sensory adaptation to human voices
title_sort social evaluative implications of sensory adaptation to human voices
topic sensory adaptation
vocal characteristics
evaluative aftereffects
gender typicality
impression formation
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.231348
work_keys_str_mv AT kelseylneuenswander socialevaluativeimplicationsofsensoryadaptationtohumanvoices
AT gracesrgillespie socialevaluativeimplicationsofsensoryadaptationtohumanvoices
AT davidjlick socialevaluativeimplicationsofsensoryadaptationtohumanvoices
AT gregoryabryant socialevaluativeimplicationsofsensoryadaptationtohumanvoices
AT kerriljohnson socialevaluativeimplicationsofsensoryadaptationtohumanvoices