What do we want to know about MOOCs? Results from a machine learning approach to a systematic literature mapping review

Abstract By the end of 2020, over 16,300 Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) from 950 universities worldwide had enrolled over 180 million students. Interest in MOOCs has been matched by significant research on the topic, including a considerable number of reviews. This study uses Machine Learning t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ignacio Despujol, Linda Castañeda, Victoria I. Marín, Carlos Turró
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-10-01
Series:International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00359-1
_version_ 1817984019127599104
author Ignacio Despujol
Linda Castañeda
Victoria I. Marín
Carlos Turró
author_facet Ignacio Despujol
Linda Castañeda
Victoria I. Marín
Carlos Turró
author_sort Ignacio Despujol
collection DOAJ
description Abstract By the end of 2020, over 16,300 Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) from 950 universities worldwide had enrolled over 180 million students. Interest in MOOCs has been matched by significant research on the topic, including a considerable number of reviews. This study uses Machine Learning techniques and human expert supervision to generate a comprehensive systematic literature mapping review that overcomes some limitations of the traditional ones and provides a broader overview of the content and main topics studied in the specialized literature devoted to MOOCs. The sample consisted of 6320 publications automatically classified within six research topics, denominated by human experts: institutional approach, pedagogical approach, evaluation, analytics, participation, and educational resources. The content analysis of the topics identified was conducted using visual network analysis, which supported the identification of different thematic sub-clusters and endorsed the classification. Results from the review show that the lowest production of MOOC papers is within the topics of the pedagogical approach and educational resources. In contrast, participation and evaluation are the most frequent ones. In addition, the most cited papers are on the topics of analytics and resources, being the pedagogical approach and the institutional approach the less cited. This highlights the need for more MOOC research from a pedagogical perspective and calls upon the presence of educators.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T23:40:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8443024723f645048d750fc0b50ffb23
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2365-9440
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T23:40:54Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
spelling doaj.art-8443024723f645048d750fc0b50ffb232022-12-22T02:24:32ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education2365-94402022-10-0119112210.1186/s41239-022-00359-1What do we want to know about MOOCs? Results from a machine learning approach to a systematic literature mapping reviewIgnacio Despujol0Linda Castañeda1Victoria I. Marín2Carlos Turró3Universitat Politècnica de ValènciaUniversidad de MurciaUniversitat de LleidaUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaAbstract By the end of 2020, over 16,300 Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) from 950 universities worldwide had enrolled over 180 million students. Interest in MOOCs has been matched by significant research on the topic, including a considerable number of reviews. This study uses Machine Learning techniques and human expert supervision to generate a comprehensive systematic literature mapping review that overcomes some limitations of the traditional ones and provides a broader overview of the content and main topics studied in the specialized literature devoted to MOOCs. The sample consisted of 6320 publications automatically classified within six research topics, denominated by human experts: institutional approach, pedagogical approach, evaluation, analytics, participation, and educational resources. The content analysis of the topics identified was conducted using visual network analysis, which supported the identification of different thematic sub-clusters and endorsed the classification. Results from the review show that the lowest production of MOOC papers is within the topics of the pedagogical approach and educational resources. In contrast, participation and evaluation are the most frequent ones. In addition, the most cited papers are on the topics of analytics and resources, being the pedagogical approach and the institutional approach the less cited. This highlights the need for more MOOC research from a pedagogical perspective and calls upon the presence of educators.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00359-1MOOCsMachine learningClustering
spellingShingle Ignacio Despujol
Linda Castañeda
Victoria I. Marín
Carlos Turró
What do we want to know about MOOCs? Results from a machine learning approach to a systematic literature mapping review
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
MOOCs
Machine learning
Clustering
title What do we want to know about MOOCs? Results from a machine learning approach to a systematic literature mapping review
title_full What do we want to know about MOOCs? Results from a machine learning approach to a systematic literature mapping review
title_fullStr What do we want to know about MOOCs? Results from a machine learning approach to a systematic literature mapping review
title_full_unstemmed What do we want to know about MOOCs? Results from a machine learning approach to a systematic literature mapping review
title_short What do we want to know about MOOCs? Results from a machine learning approach to a systematic literature mapping review
title_sort what do we want to know about moocs results from a machine learning approach to a systematic literature mapping review
topic MOOCs
Machine learning
Clustering
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00359-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ignaciodespujol whatdowewanttoknowaboutmoocsresultsfromamachinelearningapproachtoasystematicliteraturemappingreview
AT lindacastaneda whatdowewanttoknowaboutmoocsresultsfromamachinelearningapproachtoasystematicliteraturemappingreview
AT victoriaimarin whatdowewanttoknowaboutmoocsresultsfromamachinelearningapproachtoasystematicliteraturemappingreview
AT carlosturro whatdowewanttoknowaboutmoocsresultsfromamachinelearningapproachtoasystematicliteraturemappingreview