Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress in silorane-based composites

Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the polymerization shrinkage stress among conventional methacrylate-based composite resins and a silorane-based composite resin. Materials and Methods The strain gauge method was used for the determination of polymerization shrinkage strain....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seung-Ji Ryu, Ji-Hoon Cheon, Jeong-Bum Min
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2011-05-01
Series:Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.3.188
_version_ 1818954955907661824
author Seung-Ji Ryu,
Ji-Hoon Cheon
Jeong-Bum Min
author_facet Seung-Ji Ryu,
Ji-Hoon Cheon
Jeong-Bum Min
author_sort Seung-Ji Ryu,
collection DOAJ
description Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the polymerization shrinkage stress among conventional methacrylate-based composite resins and a silorane-based composite resin. Materials and Methods The strain gauge method was used for the determination of polymerization shrinkage strain. Specimens were divided by 3 groups according to various composite materials. Filtek Z-250 (3M ESPE) and Filtek P-60 (3M ESPE) were used as a conventional methacrylate-based composites and Filtek P-90 (3M ESPE) was used as a silorane-based composites. Measurements were recorded at each 1 second for the total of 800 seconds including the periods of light application. The results of polymerization shrinkage stress were statistically analyzed using One way ANOVA and Tukey test (p = 0.05). Results The polymerization shrinkage stress of a silorane-based composite resin was lower than those of conventional methacrylate-based composite resins (p < 0.05). The shrinkage stress between methacrylate-based composite resin groups did not show significant difference (p > 0.05). Conclusions Within the limitation of this study, silorane-based composites showed lower polymerization shrinkage stress than methacrylate-based composites. We need to investigate more into polymerization shrinkage stress with regard to elastic modulus of silorane-based composites for the precise result.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T10:30:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-84446ed087c3447aab908606815745bb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-7658
2234-7666
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T10:30:24Z
publishDate 2011-05-01
publisher Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
record_format Article
series Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
spelling doaj.art-84446ed087c3447aab908606815745bb2022-12-21T19:43:45ZengKorean Academy of Conservative DentistryRestorative Dentistry & Endodontics2234-76582234-76662011-05-0136318819510.5395/JKACD.2011.36.3.188 Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress in silorane-based compositesSeung-Ji Ryu,0 Ji-Hoon Cheon1Jeong-Bum Min2Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry, Gwangju, Korea.Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry, Gwangju, Korea.Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry, Gwangju, Korea.Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the polymerization shrinkage stress among conventional methacrylate-based composite resins and a silorane-based composite resin. Materials and Methods The strain gauge method was used for the determination of polymerization shrinkage strain. Specimens were divided by 3 groups according to various composite materials. Filtek Z-250 (3M ESPE) and Filtek P-60 (3M ESPE) were used as a conventional methacrylate-based composites and Filtek P-90 (3M ESPE) was used as a silorane-based composites. Measurements were recorded at each 1 second for the total of 800 seconds including the periods of light application. The results of polymerization shrinkage stress were statistically analyzed using One way ANOVA and Tukey test (p = 0.05). Results The polymerization shrinkage stress of a silorane-based composite resin was lower than those of conventional methacrylate-based composite resins (p < 0.05). The shrinkage stress between methacrylate-based composite resin groups did not show significant difference (p > 0.05). Conclusions Within the limitation of this study, silorane-based composites showed lower polymerization shrinkage stress than methacrylate-based composites. We need to investigate more into polymerization shrinkage stress with regard to elastic modulus of silorane-based composites for the precise result.https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.3.188
spellingShingle Seung-Ji Ryu,
Ji-Hoon Cheon
Jeong-Bum Min
Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress in silorane-based composites
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
title Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress in silorane-based composites
title_full Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress in silorane-based composites
title_fullStr Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress in silorane-based composites
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress in silorane-based composites
title_short Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress in silorane-based composites
title_sort evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress in silorane based composites
url https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.3.188
work_keys_str_mv AT seungjiryu evaluationofpolymerizationshrinkagestressinsiloranebasedcomposites
AT jihooncheon evaluationofpolymerizationshrinkagestressinsiloranebasedcomposites
AT jeongbummin evaluationofpolymerizationshrinkagestressinsiloranebasedcomposites