Elucidating the microbiome of the sustainable peat replacers composts and nature management residues

Sustainable peat alternatives, such as composts and management residues, are considered to have beneficial microbiological characteristics compared to peat-based substrates. Studies comparing microbiological characteristics of these three types of biomass are, however, lacking. This study examined i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steffi Pot, Caroline De Tender, Sarah Ommeslag, Ilse Delcour, Johan Ceusters, Bart Vandecasteele, Jane Debode, Karen Vancampenhout
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.983855/full
_version_ 1798000396670599168
author Steffi Pot
Steffi Pot
Caroline De Tender
Caroline De Tender
Sarah Ommeslag
Ilse Delcour
Johan Ceusters
Johan Ceusters
Bart Vandecasteele
Jane Debode
Karen Vancampenhout
author_facet Steffi Pot
Steffi Pot
Caroline De Tender
Caroline De Tender
Sarah Ommeslag
Ilse Delcour
Johan Ceusters
Johan Ceusters
Bart Vandecasteele
Jane Debode
Karen Vancampenhout
author_sort Steffi Pot
collection DOAJ
description Sustainable peat alternatives, such as composts and management residues, are considered to have beneficial microbiological characteristics compared to peat-based substrates. Studies comparing microbiological characteristics of these three types of biomass are, however, lacking. This study examined if and how microbiological characteristics of subtypes of composts and management residues differ from peat-based substrates, and how feedstock and (bio)chemical characteristics drive these characteristics. In addition, microbiome characteristics were evaluated that may contribute to plant growth and health. These characteristics include: genera associated with known beneficial or harmful microorganisms, microbial diversity, functional diversity/activity, microbial biomass, fungal to bacterial ratio and inoculation efficiency with the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum. Bacterial and fungal communities were studied using 16S rRNA and ITS2 gene metabarcoding, community-level physiological profiling (Biolog EcoPlates) and PLFA analysis. Inoculation with T. harzianum was assessed using qPCR. Samples of feedstock-based subtypes of composts and peat-based substrates showed similar microbial community compositions, while subtypes based on management residues were more variable in their microbial community composition. For management residues, a classification based on pH and hemicellulose content may be relevant for bacterial and fungal communities, respectively. Green composts, vegetable, fruit and garden composts and woody composts show the most potential to enhance plant growth or to suppress pathogens for non-acidophilic plants, while grass clippings, chopped heath and woody fractions of compost show the most potential for blends for calcifuge plants. Fungal biomass was a suitable predictor for inoculation efficiency of composts and management residues.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T11:18:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-84477483512e439b8962832359c87ed1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-302X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T11:18:29Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Microbiology
spelling doaj.art-84477483512e439b8962832359c87ed12022-12-22T04:27:08ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2022-09-011310.3389/fmicb.2022.983855983855Elucidating the microbiome of the sustainable peat replacers composts and nature management residuesSteffi Pot0Steffi Pot1Caroline De Tender2Caroline De Tender3Sarah Ommeslag4Ilse Delcour5Johan Ceusters6Johan Ceusters7Bart Vandecasteele8Jane Debode9Karen Vancampenhout10Division Forest, Nature and Landscape, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Geel, BelgiumPlant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Merelbeke, BelgiumPlant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Merelbeke, BelgiumDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Zwijnaarde, BelgiumPlant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Merelbeke, BelgiumPCS Ornamental Plant Research, Destelbergen, BelgiumDivision of Crop Biotechnics, Department of Biosystems, Research Group for Sustainable Crop Production & Protection, KU Leuven, Geel, BelgiumCentre for Environmental Sciences, Environmental Biology, UHasselt, Diepenbeek, BelgiumPlant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Merelbeke, BelgiumPlant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Merelbeke, BelgiumDivision Forest, Nature and Landscape, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Geel, BelgiumSustainable peat alternatives, such as composts and management residues, are considered to have beneficial microbiological characteristics compared to peat-based substrates. Studies comparing microbiological characteristics of these three types of biomass are, however, lacking. This study examined if and how microbiological characteristics of subtypes of composts and management residues differ from peat-based substrates, and how feedstock and (bio)chemical characteristics drive these characteristics. In addition, microbiome characteristics were evaluated that may contribute to plant growth and health. These characteristics include: genera associated with known beneficial or harmful microorganisms, microbial diversity, functional diversity/activity, microbial biomass, fungal to bacterial ratio and inoculation efficiency with the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum. Bacterial and fungal communities were studied using 16S rRNA and ITS2 gene metabarcoding, community-level physiological profiling (Biolog EcoPlates) and PLFA analysis. Inoculation with T. harzianum was assessed using qPCR. Samples of feedstock-based subtypes of composts and peat-based substrates showed similar microbial community compositions, while subtypes based on management residues were more variable in their microbial community composition. For management residues, a classification based on pH and hemicellulose content may be relevant for bacterial and fungal communities, respectively. Green composts, vegetable, fruit and garden composts and woody composts show the most potential to enhance plant growth or to suppress pathogens for non-acidophilic plants, while grass clippings, chopped heath and woody fractions of compost show the most potential for blends for calcifuge plants. Fungal biomass was a suitable predictor for inoculation efficiency of composts and management residues.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.983855/fullmicrobiologycompostsBiolog EcoPlatesPLFA analysissustainable horticultural substratesnature management residues
spellingShingle Steffi Pot
Steffi Pot
Caroline De Tender
Caroline De Tender
Sarah Ommeslag
Ilse Delcour
Johan Ceusters
Johan Ceusters
Bart Vandecasteele
Jane Debode
Karen Vancampenhout
Elucidating the microbiome of the sustainable peat replacers composts and nature management residues
Frontiers in Microbiology
microbiology
composts
Biolog EcoPlates
PLFA analysis
sustainable horticultural substrates
nature management residues
title Elucidating the microbiome of the sustainable peat replacers composts and nature management residues
title_full Elucidating the microbiome of the sustainable peat replacers composts and nature management residues
title_fullStr Elucidating the microbiome of the sustainable peat replacers composts and nature management residues
title_full_unstemmed Elucidating the microbiome of the sustainable peat replacers composts and nature management residues
title_short Elucidating the microbiome of the sustainable peat replacers composts and nature management residues
title_sort elucidating the microbiome of the sustainable peat replacers composts and nature management residues
topic microbiology
composts
Biolog EcoPlates
PLFA analysis
sustainable horticultural substrates
nature management residues
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.983855/full
work_keys_str_mv AT steffipot elucidatingthemicrobiomeofthesustainablepeatreplacerscompostsandnaturemanagementresidues
AT steffipot elucidatingthemicrobiomeofthesustainablepeatreplacerscompostsandnaturemanagementresidues
AT carolinedetender elucidatingthemicrobiomeofthesustainablepeatreplacerscompostsandnaturemanagementresidues
AT carolinedetender elucidatingthemicrobiomeofthesustainablepeatreplacerscompostsandnaturemanagementresidues
AT sarahommeslag elucidatingthemicrobiomeofthesustainablepeatreplacerscompostsandnaturemanagementresidues
AT ilsedelcour elucidatingthemicrobiomeofthesustainablepeatreplacerscompostsandnaturemanagementresidues
AT johanceusters elucidatingthemicrobiomeofthesustainablepeatreplacerscompostsandnaturemanagementresidues
AT johanceusters elucidatingthemicrobiomeofthesustainablepeatreplacerscompostsandnaturemanagementresidues
AT bartvandecasteele elucidatingthemicrobiomeofthesustainablepeatreplacerscompostsandnaturemanagementresidues
AT janedebode elucidatingthemicrobiomeofthesustainablepeatreplacerscompostsandnaturemanagementresidues
AT karenvancampenhout elucidatingthemicrobiomeofthesustainablepeatreplacerscompostsandnaturemanagementresidues