Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats

The paper looks at the problems in conducting non-traditional authorship attribution studies on the canon of William Shakespeare. After a short introduction, the case is put forth that these studies are ‘scientific’ and must adhere to the tenets of the scientific method. By showing that a complete a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joseph Rudman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2016-03-01
Series:Journal of Early Modern Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-jems/article/view/7065
_version_ 1818187489950564352
author Joseph Rudman
author_facet Joseph Rudman
author_sort Joseph Rudman
collection DOAJ
description The paper looks at the problems in conducting non-traditional authorship attribution studies on the canon of William Shakespeare. After a short introduction, the case is put forth that these studies are ‘scientific’ and must adhere to the tenets of the scientific method. By showing that a complete and valid experimental plan is necessary and pointing out the many and varied pitfalls (e.g., the text, the control groups, the treatment of errors), it becomes clear what a valid study of Shakespearean non-traditional authorship attribution demands. I then come to the conclusion that such a valid study is not attainable with the limits of present-day knowledge.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T23:11:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8449b2cdcbdf44898a652b3fc2986829
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2279-7149
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T23:11:51Z
publishDate 2016-03-01
publisher Firenze University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Early Modern Studies
spelling doaj.art-8449b2cdcbdf44898a652b3fc29868292022-12-22T00:46:40ZengFirenze University PressJournal of Early Modern Studies2279-71492016-03-01510.13128/JEMS-2279-7149-1809415132Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some CaveatsJoseph Rudman0Laboratorio editoriale OA / Dip. LILSIThe paper looks at the problems in conducting non-traditional authorship attribution studies on the canon of William Shakespeare. After a short introduction, the case is put forth that these studies are ‘scientific’ and must adhere to the tenets of the scientific method. By showing that a complete and valid experimental plan is necessary and pointing out the many and varied pitfalls (e.g., the text, the control groups, the treatment of errors), it becomes clear what a valid study of Shakespearean non-traditional authorship attribution demands. I then come to the conclusion that such a valid study is not attainable with the limits of present-day knowledge.https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-jems/article/view/7065AttributionAuthorshipShakespeareStatistics
spellingShingle Joseph Rudman
Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats
Journal of Early Modern Studies
Attribution
Authorship
Shakespeare
Statistics
title Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats
title_full Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats
title_fullStr Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats
title_full_unstemmed Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats
title_short Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats
title_sort non traditional authorship attribution studies of william shakespeare s canon some caveats
topic Attribution
Authorship
Shakespeare
Statistics
url https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-jems/article/view/7065
work_keys_str_mv AT josephrudman nontraditionalauthorshipattributionstudiesofwilliamshakespearescanonsomecaveats