Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats
The paper looks at the problems in conducting non-traditional authorship attribution studies on the canon of William Shakespeare. After a short introduction, the case is put forth that these studies are ‘scientific’ and must adhere to the tenets of the scientific method. By showing that a complete a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Firenze University Press
2016-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Early Modern Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-jems/article/view/7065 |
_version_ | 1818187489950564352 |
---|---|
author | Joseph Rudman |
author_facet | Joseph Rudman |
author_sort | Joseph Rudman |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The paper looks at the problems in conducting non-traditional authorship attribution studies on the canon of William Shakespeare. After a short introduction, the case is put forth that these studies are ‘scientific’ and must adhere to the tenets of the scientific method. By showing that a complete and valid experimental plan is necessary and pointing out the many and varied pitfalls (e.g., the text, the control groups, the treatment of errors), it becomes clear what a valid study of Shakespearean non-traditional authorship attribution demands. I then come to the conclusion that such a valid study is not attainable with the limits of present-day knowledge. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:11:51Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8449b2cdcbdf44898a652b3fc2986829 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2279-7149 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:11:51Z |
publishDate | 2016-03-01 |
publisher | Firenze University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Early Modern Studies |
spelling | doaj.art-8449b2cdcbdf44898a652b3fc29868292022-12-22T00:46:40ZengFirenze University PressJournal of Early Modern Studies2279-71492016-03-01510.13128/JEMS-2279-7149-1809415132Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some CaveatsJoseph Rudman0Laboratorio editoriale OA / Dip. LILSIThe paper looks at the problems in conducting non-traditional authorship attribution studies on the canon of William Shakespeare. After a short introduction, the case is put forth that these studies are ‘scientific’ and must adhere to the tenets of the scientific method. By showing that a complete and valid experimental plan is necessary and pointing out the many and varied pitfalls (e.g., the text, the control groups, the treatment of errors), it becomes clear what a valid study of Shakespearean non-traditional authorship attribution demands. I then come to the conclusion that such a valid study is not attainable with the limits of present-day knowledge.https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-jems/article/view/7065AttributionAuthorshipShakespeareStatistics |
spellingShingle | Joseph Rudman Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats Journal of Early Modern Studies Attribution Authorship Shakespeare Statistics |
title | Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats |
title_full | Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats |
title_fullStr | Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats |
title_short | Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats |
title_sort | non traditional authorship attribution studies of william shakespeare s canon some caveats |
topic | Attribution Authorship Shakespeare Statistics |
url | https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-jems/article/view/7065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT josephrudman nontraditionalauthorshipattributionstudiesofwilliamshakespearescanonsomecaveats |