Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography-guided or asphericity-adjusted derived data: a comparative contralateral eye study

Abstract Background Wavefront-optimized laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ablation is the most commonly performed procedure in refractive surgery, but new technologies have become available. Our goal was to compare topography-guided (Contoura) and asphericity-guided (Custom-Q) customized...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ermano M. Alves, Adriana F. Lyra, Manuela Tenório, Natália Mesquita, Carolina Bacelar, Afra Montenegro, Lucas Alves, Márcio Alves
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-04-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02407-w
_version_ 1818014080187760640
author Ermano M. Alves
Adriana F. Lyra
Manuela Tenório
Natália Mesquita
Carolina Bacelar
Afra Montenegro
Lucas Alves
Márcio Alves
author_facet Ermano M. Alves
Adriana F. Lyra
Manuela Tenório
Natália Mesquita
Carolina Bacelar
Afra Montenegro
Lucas Alves
Márcio Alves
author_sort Ermano M. Alves
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Wavefront-optimized laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ablation is the most commonly performed procedure in refractive surgery, but new technologies have become available. Our goal was to compare topography-guided (Contoura) and asphericity-guided (Custom-Q) customized ablation treatments for the correction of myopia with or without astigmatism. Methods This prospective, randomized, double-blind, contralateral eye study included 60 eyes of 30 patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism requiring femtosecond LASIK (FemtoLASIK) treatment. For each patient, one eye was randomized to undergo Contoura treatment, and the other underwent Custom-Q abaltion. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), sphere (SPH), cylinder (CYL), 6.0-mm total corneal aberration root mean square (RMS), coma (COMA), trefoil (TREF), and spherical aberration (SA) were measured and analysed after a 1-year follow-up. Results The UDVA was − 0.08 ± 0.06 logMAR in Contoura eyes and − 0.08 ± 0.05 logMAR in Custom-Q eyes (p = 0.309) after 12 months. Twenty-five eyes (83%) in the Contoura group and twenty-six eyes (87%) in the Custom-Q group had a UDVA of 20/16 at the end of 12 months, and 100% of eyes in both groups reached a UDVA of 20/25 or better. Ninety and 100% of eyes in the Contoura and Custom-Q groups, respectively, achieved a residual CYL ≤0.50 D (p = 0.237). No statistically significant difference was observed between the surgical techniques in the preoperative to 1-year postoperative changes for any of the parameters evaluated (MRSE, CYL, RMS, DEF, COMA, TREF, and SA). Conclusions The Contoura and Custom-Q techniques yielded excellent visual and refractive results, but the evidence did not reveal any clear differences between these two methods after 1 year of follow-up. Trial registration ReBEC - Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos [Internet]: Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Instituto de Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Brazil); 2010 -. Identifier RBR-8rs5kt Myopia and Astigmatism Topography-guided Refractive Surgery by Contoura Method Versus Customized by Asphericity in Contralateral Eyes: A prospective Double blind Randomized Study. Available from https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-8rs5kt Date of registration: 02/03/2020 (dd/mm/yyyy). CAAE:96778718.9.0000.5192. Issuing authority: Plataforma Brasil. CEP:2.979.279. Issuing authority: HUOC.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T06:41:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-844b1d20f05a4979abeab6585400f58f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2415
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T06:41:05Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-844b1d20f05a4979abeab6585400f58f2022-12-22T02:07:20ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152022-04-0122111310.1186/s12886-022-02407-wFemtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography-guided or asphericity-adjusted derived data: a comparative contralateral eye studyErmano M. Alves0Adriana F. Lyra1Manuela Tenório2Natália Mesquita3Carolina Bacelar4Afra Montenegro5Lucas Alves6Márcio Alves7OftalmaxHospital Santa LuziaOftalmaxOftalmaxHospital Santa LuziaOftalmaxFAVFPS-IMIPAbstract Background Wavefront-optimized laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ablation is the most commonly performed procedure in refractive surgery, but new technologies have become available. Our goal was to compare topography-guided (Contoura) and asphericity-guided (Custom-Q) customized ablation treatments for the correction of myopia with or without astigmatism. Methods This prospective, randomized, double-blind, contralateral eye study included 60 eyes of 30 patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism requiring femtosecond LASIK (FemtoLASIK) treatment. For each patient, one eye was randomized to undergo Contoura treatment, and the other underwent Custom-Q abaltion. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), sphere (SPH), cylinder (CYL), 6.0-mm total corneal aberration root mean square (RMS), coma (COMA), trefoil (TREF), and spherical aberration (SA) were measured and analysed after a 1-year follow-up. Results The UDVA was − 0.08 ± 0.06 logMAR in Contoura eyes and − 0.08 ± 0.05 logMAR in Custom-Q eyes (p = 0.309) after 12 months. Twenty-five eyes (83%) in the Contoura group and twenty-six eyes (87%) in the Custom-Q group had a UDVA of 20/16 at the end of 12 months, and 100% of eyes in both groups reached a UDVA of 20/25 or better. Ninety and 100% of eyes in the Contoura and Custom-Q groups, respectively, achieved a residual CYL ≤0.50 D (p = 0.237). No statistically significant difference was observed between the surgical techniques in the preoperative to 1-year postoperative changes for any of the parameters evaluated (MRSE, CYL, RMS, DEF, COMA, TREF, and SA). Conclusions The Contoura and Custom-Q techniques yielded excellent visual and refractive results, but the evidence did not reveal any clear differences between these two methods after 1 year of follow-up. Trial registration ReBEC - Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos [Internet]: Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Instituto de Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Brazil); 2010 -. Identifier RBR-8rs5kt Myopia and Astigmatism Topography-guided Refractive Surgery by Contoura Method Versus Customized by Asphericity in Contralateral Eyes: A prospective Double blind Randomized Study. Available from https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-8rs5kt Date of registration: 02/03/2020 (dd/mm/yyyy). CAAE:96778718.9.0000.5192. Issuing authority: Plataforma Brasil. CEP:2.979.279. Issuing authority: HUOC.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02407-wFemtosecond LASIKfemtoLASIKTopography-guided LASIKAsphericity-guided LASIKT-CATCustom-Q
spellingShingle Ermano M. Alves
Adriana F. Lyra
Manuela Tenório
Natália Mesquita
Carolina Bacelar
Afra Montenegro
Lucas Alves
Márcio Alves
Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography-guided or asphericity-adjusted derived data: a comparative contralateral eye study
BMC Ophthalmology
Femtosecond LASIK
femtoLASIK
Topography-guided LASIK
Asphericity-guided LASIK
T-CAT
Custom-Q
title Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography-guided or asphericity-adjusted derived data: a comparative contralateral eye study
title_full Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography-guided or asphericity-adjusted derived data: a comparative contralateral eye study
title_fullStr Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography-guided or asphericity-adjusted derived data: a comparative contralateral eye study
title_full_unstemmed Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography-guided or asphericity-adjusted derived data: a comparative contralateral eye study
title_short Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography-guided or asphericity-adjusted derived data: a comparative contralateral eye study
title_sort femtosecond laser assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography guided or asphericity adjusted derived data a comparative contralateral eye study
topic Femtosecond LASIK
femtoLASIK
Topography-guided LASIK
Asphericity-guided LASIK
T-CAT
Custom-Q
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02407-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ermanomalves femtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusiswithtopographyguidedorasphericityadjustedderiveddataacomparativecontralateraleyestudy
AT adrianaflyra femtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusiswithtopographyguidedorasphericityadjustedderiveddataacomparativecontralateraleyestudy
AT manuelatenorio femtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusiswithtopographyguidedorasphericityadjustedderiveddataacomparativecontralateraleyestudy
AT nataliamesquita femtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusiswithtopographyguidedorasphericityadjustedderiveddataacomparativecontralateraleyestudy
AT carolinabacelar femtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusiswithtopographyguidedorasphericityadjustedderiveddataacomparativecontralateraleyestudy
AT aframontenegro femtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusiswithtopographyguidedorasphericityadjustedderiveddataacomparativecontralateraleyestudy
AT lucasalves femtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusiswithtopographyguidedorasphericityadjustedderiveddataacomparativecontralateraleyestudy
AT marcioalves femtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusiswithtopographyguidedorasphericityadjustedderiveddataacomparativecontralateraleyestudy