Quantitative collateral score for the prediction of clinical outcomes in stroke patients: Better than visual grading

ObjectivesTo identify preoperative prognostic factors for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and compare the performance of quantitative collateral score (qCS) and visual collateral score (vCS) in outcome prediction.MethodsFifty-five patients with AIS receivi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qingqing Lu, Haiyan Zhang, Xin Cao, Junyan Fu, Yuning Pan, Xiaodong Zheng, Jianhong Wang, Daoying Geng, Jun Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.980135/full
_version_ 1811234362063060992
author Qingqing Lu
Qingqing Lu
Haiyan Zhang
Xin Cao
Junyan Fu
Yuning Pan
Xiaodong Zheng
Jianhong Wang
Daoying Geng
Daoying Geng
Jun Zhang
Jun Zhang
author_facet Qingqing Lu
Qingqing Lu
Haiyan Zhang
Xin Cao
Junyan Fu
Yuning Pan
Xiaodong Zheng
Jianhong Wang
Daoying Geng
Daoying Geng
Jun Zhang
Jun Zhang
author_sort Qingqing Lu
collection DOAJ
description ObjectivesTo identify preoperative prognostic factors for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and compare the performance of quantitative collateral score (qCS) and visual collateral score (vCS) in outcome prediction.MethodsFifty-five patients with AIS receiving MT were retrospectively enrolled. qCS was defined as the percentage of the volume of collaterals of both hemispheres. Based on the dichotomous outcome assessed using a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS), we compared qCS, vCS, age, sex, National Institute of Health stroke scale score, etiological subtype, platelet count, international normalized ratio, glucose levels, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels between favorable and unfavorable outcome groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the effect on the clinical outcome. The discriminatory power of qCS, vCS, and their combination with cofounders for determining favorable outcomes was tested with the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsvCS, qCS, LDL-C, and age could all predict clinical outcomes. qCS is superior over vCS in predicting favorable outcomes with a relatively higher AUC value (qCS vs. vCS: 0.81 vs. 0.74) and a higher sensitivity rate (qCS vs. vCS: 72.7% vs. 40.9%). The prediction power of qCS + LDL-C + age was best with an AUC value of 0.91, but the accuracy was just increased slightly compared to that of qCS alone.ConclusionCollateral scores, LDL-C and age were independent prognostic predictors for patients with AIS receiving MT; qCS was a better predictor than vCS. Furthermore, qCS + LDL-C + age offers a strong prognostic prediction power and qCS alone was another good choice for predicting clinical outcome.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:36:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-844e59d1b8534d0fb4e395fc49ab06de
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:36:27Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-844e59d1b8534d0fb4e395fc49ab06de2022-12-22T03:34:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2022-10-011610.3389/fnins.2022.980135980135Quantitative collateral score for the prediction of clinical outcomes in stroke patients: Better than visual gradingQingqing Lu0Qingqing Lu1Haiyan Zhang2Xin Cao3Junyan Fu4Yuning Pan5Xiaodong Zheng6Jianhong Wang7Daoying Geng8Daoying Geng9Jun Zhang10Jun Zhang11State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaNational Center for Neurological Disorders, Shanghai, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaCenter for Shanghai Intelligent Imaging for Critical Brain Diseases Engineering and Technology Research, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaObjectivesTo identify preoperative prognostic factors for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and compare the performance of quantitative collateral score (qCS) and visual collateral score (vCS) in outcome prediction.MethodsFifty-five patients with AIS receiving MT were retrospectively enrolled. qCS was defined as the percentage of the volume of collaterals of both hemispheres. Based on the dichotomous outcome assessed using a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS), we compared qCS, vCS, age, sex, National Institute of Health stroke scale score, etiological subtype, platelet count, international normalized ratio, glucose levels, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels between favorable and unfavorable outcome groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the effect on the clinical outcome. The discriminatory power of qCS, vCS, and their combination with cofounders for determining favorable outcomes was tested with the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsvCS, qCS, LDL-C, and age could all predict clinical outcomes. qCS is superior over vCS in predicting favorable outcomes with a relatively higher AUC value (qCS vs. vCS: 0.81 vs. 0.74) and a higher sensitivity rate (qCS vs. vCS: 72.7% vs. 40.9%). The prediction power of qCS + LDL-C + age was best with an AUC value of 0.91, but the accuracy was just increased slightly compared to that of qCS alone.ConclusionCollateral scores, LDL-C and age were independent prognostic predictors for patients with AIS receiving MT; qCS was a better predictor than vCS. Furthermore, qCS + LDL-C + age offers a strong prognostic prediction power and qCS alone was another good choice for predicting clinical outcome.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.980135/fullquantitative collateral scorevisual collateral scoreacute ischemic strokemechanical thrombectomylow-density lipoprotein cholesterolindependent prognostic predictor
spellingShingle Qingqing Lu
Qingqing Lu
Haiyan Zhang
Xin Cao
Junyan Fu
Yuning Pan
Xiaodong Zheng
Jianhong Wang
Daoying Geng
Daoying Geng
Jun Zhang
Jun Zhang
Quantitative collateral score for the prediction of clinical outcomes in stroke patients: Better than visual grading
Frontiers in Neuroscience
quantitative collateral score
visual collateral score
acute ischemic stroke
mechanical thrombectomy
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
independent prognostic predictor
title Quantitative collateral score for the prediction of clinical outcomes in stroke patients: Better than visual grading
title_full Quantitative collateral score for the prediction of clinical outcomes in stroke patients: Better than visual grading
title_fullStr Quantitative collateral score for the prediction of clinical outcomes in stroke patients: Better than visual grading
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative collateral score for the prediction of clinical outcomes in stroke patients: Better than visual grading
title_short Quantitative collateral score for the prediction of clinical outcomes in stroke patients: Better than visual grading
title_sort quantitative collateral score for the prediction of clinical outcomes in stroke patients better than visual grading
topic quantitative collateral score
visual collateral score
acute ischemic stroke
mechanical thrombectomy
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
independent prognostic predictor
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.980135/full
work_keys_str_mv AT qingqinglu quantitativecollateralscoreforthepredictionofclinicaloutcomesinstrokepatientsbetterthanvisualgrading
AT qingqinglu quantitativecollateralscoreforthepredictionofclinicaloutcomesinstrokepatientsbetterthanvisualgrading
AT haiyanzhang quantitativecollateralscoreforthepredictionofclinicaloutcomesinstrokepatientsbetterthanvisualgrading
AT xincao quantitativecollateralscoreforthepredictionofclinicaloutcomesinstrokepatientsbetterthanvisualgrading
AT junyanfu quantitativecollateralscoreforthepredictionofclinicaloutcomesinstrokepatientsbetterthanvisualgrading
AT yuningpan quantitativecollateralscoreforthepredictionofclinicaloutcomesinstrokepatientsbetterthanvisualgrading
AT xiaodongzheng quantitativecollateralscoreforthepredictionofclinicaloutcomesinstrokepatientsbetterthanvisualgrading
AT jianhongwang quantitativecollateralscoreforthepredictionofclinicaloutcomesinstrokepatientsbetterthanvisualgrading
AT daoyinggeng quantitativecollateralscoreforthepredictionofclinicaloutcomesinstrokepatientsbetterthanvisualgrading
AT daoyinggeng quantitativecollateralscoreforthepredictionofclinicaloutcomesinstrokepatientsbetterthanvisualgrading
AT junzhang quantitativecollateralscoreforthepredictionofclinicaloutcomesinstrokepatientsbetterthanvisualgrading
AT junzhang quantitativecollateralscoreforthepredictionofclinicaloutcomesinstrokepatientsbetterthanvisualgrading