KRITIK ATAS PANDANGAN WILLIAM M. WATT TERHADAP SEJARAH PENULISAN AL-QUR’AN

The study of the Qur'an has been a topic of interest to many circles, excluding Western scholars. Many of the themes they promote are generally related to the authenticity of the Qur'an. To get into this problem, many circles start arguing from the history of the Qur'an. It is this th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhammad Alwi
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Faculty of Usuluddin and Islamic Thought, State Islamic University (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga 2020-01-01
Series:Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/ushuluddin/alquran/article/view/2007
_version_ 1818935470484094976
author Muhammad Alwi
author_facet Muhammad Alwi
author_sort Muhammad Alwi
collection DOAJ
description The study of the Qur'an has been a topic of interest to many circles, excluding Western scholars. Many of the themes they promote are generally related to the authenticity of the Qur'an. To get into this problem, many circles start arguing from the history of the Qur'an. It is this theme that William M. Watt is concerned within studying the Qur'an. Watt begins his narrative by referring to the term Ummi referred to by the Prophet Muhammad. Likewise, arguments about the literary tradition of the community are presented by reference to many verses in the Qur'an. The majority of interpretations produced are in sharp contrast to the views of the majority of Muslim scholars, so this study aims to conduct a review of Watt's views using thematic methods. This study concludes that the Qur'anic verses used as the basis for Watt's argument over the history of Qur'anic writing can be categorized into two types; historical arguments and interpretations. In the model of historical argument, Watt tends to assume that the writing tradition among the Arabs is also owned by the Prophet, so that the word of the people attached to the Prophet is understood as the Prophet's ignorance of the ancient scriptures. To reinforce the historical argument, Watt analyzes several passages relating to the term public for reinterpretation. Watt's steps in explaining the Qur'an's writing history tend to differ from many circles. Some historical arguments using the basis of verse tend to generalize their context, thus influencing many subsequent interpretations. This is why Watt's opinion is different from the opinion of the majority of scholars.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T05:20:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-846171815a5849d586653beffa8197e8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1411-6855
2548-4737
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-12-20T05:20:41Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Faculty of Usuluddin and Islamic Thought, State Islamic University (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga
record_format Article
series Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis
spelling doaj.art-846171815a5849d586653beffa8197e82022-12-21T19:52:01ZaraFaculty of Usuluddin and Islamic Thought, State Islamic University (UIN) Sunan KalijagaJurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis1411-68552548-47372020-01-012118911010.14421/qh.2020.2101-051579KRITIK ATAS PANDANGAN WILLIAM M. WATT TERHADAP SEJARAH PENULISAN AL-QUR’ANMuhammad Alwi0UIN Sunan Kalijaga YogyakartaThe study of the Qur'an has been a topic of interest to many circles, excluding Western scholars. Many of the themes they promote are generally related to the authenticity of the Qur'an. To get into this problem, many circles start arguing from the history of the Qur'an. It is this theme that William M. Watt is concerned within studying the Qur'an. Watt begins his narrative by referring to the term Ummi referred to by the Prophet Muhammad. Likewise, arguments about the literary tradition of the community are presented by reference to many verses in the Qur'an. The majority of interpretations produced are in sharp contrast to the views of the majority of Muslim scholars, so this study aims to conduct a review of Watt's views using thematic methods. This study concludes that the Qur'anic verses used as the basis for Watt's argument over the history of Qur'anic writing can be categorized into two types; historical arguments and interpretations. In the model of historical argument, Watt tends to assume that the writing tradition among the Arabs is also owned by the Prophet, so that the word of the people attached to the Prophet is understood as the Prophet's ignorance of the ancient scriptures. To reinforce the historical argument, Watt analyzes several passages relating to the term public for reinterpretation. Watt's steps in explaining the Qur'an's writing history tend to differ from many circles. Some historical arguments using the basis of verse tend to generalize their context, thus influencing many subsequent interpretations. This is why Watt's opinion is different from the opinion of the majority of scholars.http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/ushuluddin/alquran/article/view/2007orientalist, w. montgomery watt, al-qur'an, writing, ummi
spellingShingle Muhammad Alwi
KRITIK ATAS PANDANGAN WILLIAM M. WATT TERHADAP SEJARAH PENULISAN AL-QUR’AN
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis
orientalist, w. montgomery watt, al-qur'an, writing, ummi
title KRITIK ATAS PANDANGAN WILLIAM M. WATT TERHADAP SEJARAH PENULISAN AL-QUR’AN
title_full KRITIK ATAS PANDANGAN WILLIAM M. WATT TERHADAP SEJARAH PENULISAN AL-QUR’AN
title_fullStr KRITIK ATAS PANDANGAN WILLIAM M. WATT TERHADAP SEJARAH PENULISAN AL-QUR’AN
title_full_unstemmed KRITIK ATAS PANDANGAN WILLIAM M. WATT TERHADAP SEJARAH PENULISAN AL-QUR’AN
title_short KRITIK ATAS PANDANGAN WILLIAM M. WATT TERHADAP SEJARAH PENULISAN AL-QUR’AN
title_sort kritik atas pandangan william m watt terhadap sejarah penulisan al qur an
topic orientalist, w. montgomery watt, al-qur'an, writing, ummi
url http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/ushuluddin/alquran/article/view/2007
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadalwi kritikataspandanganwilliammwattterhadapsejarahpenulisanalquran