Is Diversity the Missing Link in Coastal Fisheries Management?

Fisheries management has historically focused on the population elasticity of target fish based primarily on demographic modeling, with the key assumptions of stability in environmental conditions and static trophic relationships. The predictive capacity of this fisheries framework is poor, especial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stuart Kininmonth, Thorsten Blenckner, Susa Niiranen, James Watson, Alessandro Orio, Michele Casini, Stefan Neuenfeldt, Valerio Bartolino, Martin Hansson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Diversity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/14/2/90
_version_ 1797481089186398208
author Stuart Kininmonth
Thorsten Blenckner
Susa Niiranen
James Watson
Alessandro Orio
Michele Casini
Stefan Neuenfeldt
Valerio Bartolino
Martin Hansson
author_facet Stuart Kininmonth
Thorsten Blenckner
Susa Niiranen
James Watson
Alessandro Orio
Michele Casini
Stefan Neuenfeldt
Valerio Bartolino
Martin Hansson
author_sort Stuart Kininmonth
collection DOAJ
description Fisheries management has historically focused on the population elasticity of target fish based primarily on demographic modeling, with the key assumptions of stability in environmental conditions and static trophic relationships. The predictive capacity of this fisheries framework is poor, especially in closed systems where the benthic diversity and boundary effects are important and the stock levels are low. Here, we present a probabilistic model that couples key fish populations with a complex suite of trophic, environmental, and geomorphological factors. Using 41 years of observations we model the changes in eastern Baltic cod (<i>Gadus morhua)</i>, herring <i>(Clupea harengus)</i>, and Baltic sprat (<i>Sprattus sprattus balticus</i>) for the Baltic Sea within a Bayesian network. The model predictions are spatially explicit and show the changes of the central Baltic Sea from cod- to sprat-dominated ecology over the 41 years. This also highlights how the years 2004 to 2014 deviate in terms of the typical cod–environment relationship, with environmental factors such as salinity being less influential on cod population abundance than in previous periods. The role of macrozoobenthos abundance, biotopic rugosity, and flatfish biomass showed an increased influence in predicting cod biomass in the last decade of the study. Fisheries management that is able to accommodate shifting ecological and environmental conditions relevant to biotopic information will be more effective and realistic. Non-stationary modelling for all of the homogeneous biotope regions, while acknowledging that each has a specific ecology relevant to understanding the fish population dynamics, is essential for fisheries science and sustainable management of fish stocks.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:09:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-846206f93f784a69b98330689df47cb2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-2818
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:09:30Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diversity
spelling doaj.art-846206f93f784a69b98330689df47cb22023-11-23T19:34:41ZengMDPI AGDiversity1424-28182022-01-011429010.3390/d14020090Is Diversity the Missing Link in Coastal Fisheries Management?Stuart Kininmonth0Thorsten Blenckner1Susa Niiranen2James Watson3Alessandro Orio4Michele Casini5Stefan Neuenfeldt6Valerio Bartolino7Martin Hansson8Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, SwedenStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, SwedenStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, SwedenStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Marine Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Turistgatan 5, SE-453 30 Lysekil, SwedenDepartment of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Marine Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Turistgatan 5, SE-453 30 Lysekil, SwedenNational Institute of Aquatic Resources, Section for Oceans and Arctic, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet 202, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, DenmarkDepartment of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Marine Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Turistgatan 5, SE-453 30 Lysekil, SwedenOceanographic Unit, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute—SMHI, Sven Källfelts Gata 15, SE-426 71 Västra Frölunda, SwedenFisheries management has historically focused on the population elasticity of target fish based primarily on demographic modeling, with the key assumptions of stability in environmental conditions and static trophic relationships. The predictive capacity of this fisheries framework is poor, especially in closed systems where the benthic diversity and boundary effects are important and the stock levels are low. Here, we present a probabilistic model that couples key fish populations with a complex suite of trophic, environmental, and geomorphological factors. Using 41 years of observations we model the changes in eastern Baltic cod (<i>Gadus morhua)</i>, herring <i>(Clupea harengus)</i>, and Baltic sprat (<i>Sprattus sprattus balticus</i>) for the Baltic Sea within a Bayesian network. The model predictions are spatially explicit and show the changes of the central Baltic Sea from cod- to sprat-dominated ecology over the 41 years. This also highlights how the years 2004 to 2014 deviate in terms of the typical cod–environment relationship, with environmental factors such as salinity being less influential on cod population abundance than in previous periods. The role of macrozoobenthos abundance, biotopic rugosity, and flatfish biomass showed an increased influence in predicting cod biomass in the last decade of the study. Fisheries management that is able to accommodate shifting ecological and environmental conditions relevant to biotopic information will be more effective and realistic. Non-stationary modelling for all of the homogeneous biotope regions, while acknowledging that each has a specific ecology relevant to understanding the fish population dynamics, is essential for fisheries science and sustainable management of fish stocks.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/14/2/90benthic couplingfisheries modellingBayesian networksspatially explicitBaltic Seanon-stationary
spellingShingle Stuart Kininmonth
Thorsten Blenckner
Susa Niiranen
James Watson
Alessandro Orio
Michele Casini
Stefan Neuenfeldt
Valerio Bartolino
Martin Hansson
Is Diversity the Missing Link in Coastal Fisheries Management?
Diversity
benthic coupling
fisheries modelling
Bayesian networks
spatially explicit
Baltic Sea
non-stationary
title Is Diversity the Missing Link in Coastal Fisheries Management?
title_full Is Diversity the Missing Link in Coastal Fisheries Management?
title_fullStr Is Diversity the Missing Link in Coastal Fisheries Management?
title_full_unstemmed Is Diversity the Missing Link in Coastal Fisheries Management?
title_short Is Diversity the Missing Link in Coastal Fisheries Management?
title_sort is diversity the missing link in coastal fisheries management
topic benthic coupling
fisheries modelling
Bayesian networks
spatially explicit
Baltic Sea
non-stationary
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/14/2/90
work_keys_str_mv AT stuartkininmonth isdiversitythemissinglinkincoastalfisheriesmanagement
AT thorstenblenckner isdiversitythemissinglinkincoastalfisheriesmanagement
AT susaniiranen isdiversitythemissinglinkincoastalfisheriesmanagement
AT jameswatson isdiversitythemissinglinkincoastalfisheriesmanagement
AT alessandroorio isdiversitythemissinglinkincoastalfisheriesmanagement
AT michelecasini isdiversitythemissinglinkincoastalfisheriesmanagement
AT stefanneuenfeldt isdiversitythemissinglinkincoastalfisheriesmanagement
AT valeriobartolino isdiversitythemissinglinkincoastalfisheriesmanagement
AT martinhansson isdiversitythemissinglinkincoastalfisheriesmanagement