Regionalisation in Northern Europe and the Northern Dimension in Russian political discourse

The progress and sustainability of international cross-border region formation is a major concern for Russia, a country bordering sixteen states. In the early 2000s, the development of regions with Russian participation was at its height in northwestern Europe. Cross-border regions arise both nat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kolosov V. A., Sebentsov A. B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University 2019-12-01
Series:Baltic Region
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/3fc/6_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2_76-92.pdf
_version_ 1818449041961254912
author Kolosov V. A.
Sebentsov A. B.
author_facet Kolosov V. A.
Sebentsov A. B.
author_sort Kolosov V. A.
collection DOAJ
description The progress and sustainability of international cross-border region formation is a major concern for Russia, a country bordering sixteen states. In the early 2000s, the development of regions with Russian participation was at its height in northwestern Europe. Cross-border regions arise both naturally, stemming from various functional relations, and as a result of political decisions. In the latter case, political discourse is an important factor in successful region-building. The Northern Dimension (ND) programme, which was launched in 1997, embodied the principle of depoliticised cooperation — Europe’s ‘new regionalism’. This article aims to evaluate the role of the ND in the federal and regional political discourse of 1997—2016, to determine its place among other cross-border cooperation projects, and to follow changes in the understanding of its goals. The study relies on data from the Integrum agency, which has built up the most comprehensive digital archive of federal and regional printed and online media. The federal discourse on the ND reflected the whole set of relations between Russia and the EU. The idea about the crisis of the programme came from the discrepancy between the expectations aroused by political discourse and the actual results of cooperation. The study shows the ND-related discourse changed over the study period and stresses profound differences between federal and regional discourses.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T20:29:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-846b8d388d7b4755b1526b8e7f1a1afd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-8555
2310-0524
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T20:29:06Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
record_format Article
series Baltic Region
spelling doaj.art-846b8d388d7b4755b1526b8e7f1a1afd2022-12-21T22:48:35ZengImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityBaltic Region2079-85552310-05242019-12-01114769210.5922/2079-8555-2019-4-5Regionalisation in Northern Europe and the Northern Dimension in Russian political discourseKolosov V. A.0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2817-9463Sebentsov A. B.1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9665-5666nstitute of Geography Russian Academy of Sciences, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityThe progress and sustainability of international cross-border region formation is a major concern for Russia, a country bordering sixteen states. In the early 2000s, the development of regions with Russian participation was at its height in northwestern Europe. Cross-border regions arise both naturally, stemming from various functional relations, and as a result of political decisions. In the latter case, political discourse is an important factor in successful region-building. The Northern Dimension (ND) programme, which was launched in 1997, embodied the principle of depoliticised cooperation — Europe’s ‘new regionalism’. This article aims to evaluate the role of the ND in the federal and regional political discourse of 1997—2016, to determine its place among other cross-border cooperation projects, and to follow changes in the understanding of its goals. The study relies on data from the Integrum agency, which has built up the most comprehensive digital archive of federal and regional printed and online media. The federal discourse on the ND reflected the whole set of relations between Russia and the EU. The idea about the crisis of the programme came from the discrepancy between the expectations aroused by political discourse and the actual results of cooperation. The study shows the ND-related discourse changed over the study period and stresses profound differences between federal and regional discourses.https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/3fc/6_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2_76-92.pdfsupranational regionsrussiaeunorthern dimensionpolitical discourse
spellingShingle Kolosov V. A.
Sebentsov A. B.
Regionalisation in Northern Europe and the Northern Dimension in Russian political discourse
Baltic Region
supranational regions
russia
eu
northern dimension
political discourse
title Regionalisation in Northern Europe and the Northern Dimension in Russian political discourse
title_full Regionalisation in Northern Europe and the Northern Dimension in Russian political discourse
title_fullStr Regionalisation in Northern Europe and the Northern Dimension in Russian political discourse
title_full_unstemmed Regionalisation in Northern Europe and the Northern Dimension in Russian political discourse
title_short Regionalisation in Northern Europe and the Northern Dimension in Russian political discourse
title_sort regionalisation in northern europe and the northern dimension in russian political discourse
topic supranational regions
russia
eu
northern dimension
political discourse
url https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/3fc/6_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2_76-92.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kolosovva regionalisationinnortherneuropeandthenortherndimensioninrussianpoliticaldiscourse
AT sebentsovab regionalisationinnortherneuropeandthenortherndimensioninrussianpoliticaldiscourse