Epidemiologic Evaluation and Clinical Aspects of Superficial Corneal Foreign Body Injuries at a Tertiary Referral Center in İstanbul

Aim:To assess the demographic characteristics and clinical aspects of superficial corneal foreign body (CFB) trauma, as well as to estimate the impact of awareness of CFB scar on wearing protective goggles (PG).Materials and Methods:A total of 238 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Betül Önal Günay, Şükrü Kenan Güneş, Anıl Korkmaz, Oğuz Bayraktar, Betül İlkay Sezgin Akçay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2019-06-01
Series:Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access: http://akademikaciltip.com/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/epidemiologic-evaluation-and-clinical-aspects-of-s/27803
_version_ 1797915102765121536
author Betül Önal Günay
Şükrü Kenan Güneş
Anıl Korkmaz
Oğuz Bayraktar
Betül İlkay Sezgin Akçay
author_facet Betül Önal Günay
Şükrü Kenan Güneş
Anıl Korkmaz
Oğuz Bayraktar
Betül İlkay Sezgin Akçay
author_sort Betül Önal Günay
collection DOAJ
description Aim:To assess the demographic characteristics and clinical aspects of superficial corneal foreign body (CFB) trauma, as well as to estimate the impact of awareness of CFB scar on wearing protective goggles (PG).Materials and Methods:A total of 238 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Four groups were designated, namely group 1-metal industry workers, group 2-construction workers, group 3-workers with different occupations who had considerable risk for CFB trauma and group 4-miscellaneous patients with low risk for CFB trauma.Results:There were 234 (98.3%) men and four (1.7%) women in the study. The mean age was 33.96±10.54 years (range, 3-69 years). There were 126 patients (52.9%) in group 1, 53 patients (22.3%) in group 2, 27 patients (11.3%) in group 3 and 32 patients (13.4%) in group 4. Seventy-nine patients (38.4%) did not use PG, while, 67 patients (32.5%) occasionally used PG, 34 patients (16.5%) frequently used PG and 26 patients (12.6%) routinely used PG. Awareness of CFB scar was significantly lower in patients who did not use PG (p<0.05).Conclusion:The awareness of CFB scar was significantly lower among patients who never used PG. This could be avoided by arranging training programs for workers.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T12:36:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8489a9cd4d5f47408ca8dd3421911614
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2149-5807
2149-6048
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T12:36:27Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-8489a9cd4d5f47408ca8dd34219116142023-02-15T16:14:34ZengGalenos YayineviEurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine2149-58072149-60482019-06-01182868910.4274/eajem.galenos.2019.4265013049054Epidemiologic Evaluation and Clinical Aspects of Superficial Corneal Foreign Body Injuries at a Tertiary Referral Center in İstanbulBetül Önal Günay0Şükrü Kenan Güneş1Anıl Korkmaz2Oğuz Bayraktar3Betül İlkay Sezgin Akçay4 Clinic of Ophthalmology, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey Clinic of Ophthalmology, Suşehri State Hospital, Sivas, Turkey Clinic of Ophthalmology, İzmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey Department of Ophthalmology, İstanbul University İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey Clinic of Ophthalmology, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey Aim:To assess the demographic characteristics and clinical aspects of superficial corneal foreign body (CFB) trauma, as well as to estimate the impact of awareness of CFB scar on wearing protective goggles (PG).Materials and Methods:A total of 238 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Four groups were designated, namely group 1-metal industry workers, group 2-construction workers, group 3-workers with different occupations who had considerable risk for CFB trauma and group 4-miscellaneous patients with low risk for CFB trauma.Results:There were 234 (98.3%) men and four (1.7%) women in the study. The mean age was 33.96±10.54 years (range, 3-69 years). There were 126 patients (52.9%) in group 1, 53 patients (22.3%) in group 2, 27 patients (11.3%) in group 3 and 32 patients (13.4%) in group 4. Seventy-nine patients (38.4%) did not use PG, while, 67 patients (32.5%) occasionally used PG, 34 patients (16.5%) frequently used PG and 26 patients (12.6%) routinely used PG. Awareness of CFB scar was significantly lower in patients who did not use PG (p<0.05).Conclusion:The awareness of CFB scar was significantly lower among patients who never used PG. This could be avoided by arranging training programs for workers. http://akademikaciltip.com/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/epidemiologic-evaluation-and-clinical-aspects-of-s/27803 Corneal foreign bodyepidemiologyprotective goggle usetrauma
spellingShingle Betül Önal Günay
Şükrü Kenan Güneş
Anıl Korkmaz
Oğuz Bayraktar
Betül İlkay Sezgin Akçay
Epidemiologic Evaluation and Clinical Aspects of Superficial Corneal Foreign Body Injuries at a Tertiary Referral Center in İstanbul
Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Corneal foreign body
epidemiology
protective goggle use
trauma
title Epidemiologic Evaluation and Clinical Aspects of Superficial Corneal Foreign Body Injuries at a Tertiary Referral Center in İstanbul
title_full Epidemiologic Evaluation and Clinical Aspects of Superficial Corneal Foreign Body Injuries at a Tertiary Referral Center in İstanbul
title_fullStr Epidemiologic Evaluation and Clinical Aspects of Superficial Corneal Foreign Body Injuries at a Tertiary Referral Center in İstanbul
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiologic Evaluation and Clinical Aspects of Superficial Corneal Foreign Body Injuries at a Tertiary Referral Center in İstanbul
title_short Epidemiologic Evaluation and Clinical Aspects of Superficial Corneal Foreign Body Injuries at a Tertiary Referral Center in İstanbul
title_sort epidemiologic evaluation and clinical aspects of superficial corneal foreign body injuries at a tertiary referral center in istanbul
topic Corneal foreign body
epidemiology
protective goggle use
trauma
url http://akademikaciltip.com/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/epidemiologic-evaluation-and-clinical-aspects-of-s/27803
work_keys_str_mv AT betulonalgunay epidemiologicevaluationandclinicalaspectsofsuperficialcornealforeignbodyinjuriesatatertiaryreferralcenterinistanbul
AT sukrukenangunes epidemiologicevaluationandclinicalaspectsofsuperficialcornealforeignbodyinjuriesatatertiaryreferralcenterinistanbul
AT anılkorkmaz epidemiologicevaluationandclinicalaspectsofsuperficialcornealforeignbodyinjuriesatatertiaryreferralcenterinistanbul
AT oguzbayraktar epidemiologicevaluationandclinicalaspectsofsuperficialcornealforeignbodyinjuriesatatertiaryreferralcenterinistanbul
AT betulilkaysezginakcay epidemiologicevaluationandclinicalaspectsofsuperficialcornealforeignbodyinjuriesatatertiaryreferralcenterinistanbul