Maintenance rituximab in Veterans with follicular lymphoma

Abstract Real‐world practice patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), including the adoption of maintenance rituximab (MR) therapy in the United States (US), have been reported in few studies since the release of the National LymphoCare Study almost a decade ago. We...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad S. Halwani, Kelli M. Rasmussen, Vikas Patil, Deborah Morreall, Catherine Li, Christina Yong, Zachary Burningham, Keith Dawson, Anthony Masaquel, Kevin Henderson, Elisha DeLong‐Sieg, Brian C. Sauer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-10-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3420
_version_ 1828752398141620224
author Ahmad S. Halwani
Kelli M. Rasmussen
Vikas Patil
Deborah Morreall
Catherine Li
Christina Yong
Zachary Burningham
Keith Dawson
Anthony Masaquel
Kevin Henderson
Elisha DeLong‐Sieg
Brian C. Sauer
author_facet Ahmad S. Halwani
Kelli M. Rasmussen
Vikas Patil
Deborah Morreall
Catherine Li
Christina Yong
Zachary Burningham
Keith Dawson
Anthony Masaquel
Kevin Henderson
Elisha DeLong‐Sieg
Brian C. Sauer
author_sort Ahmad S. Halwani
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Real‐world practice patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), including the adoption of maintenance rituximab (MR) therapy in the United States (US), have been reported in few studies since the release of the National LymphoCare Study almost a decade ago. We analyzed data from the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), to identify rates of adoption and effectiveness of MR in FL patients after first‐line (1L) treatment. We identified previously untreated patients with FL in the VHA between 2006 and 2014 who achieved at least stable disease after chemoimmunotherapy or immunotherapy. Among these patients, those who initiated MR within 238 days of 1L composed the MR group, whereas those who did not were classified as the non‐MR group. We examined the effect of MR on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 676 patients met our inclusion criteria, of whom 300 received MR. MR was associated with significant PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.55, P < .001) and OS (HR = 0.53, P = .005) compared to the non‐MR group, after adjusting by age, sex, ethnicity, geographic region, diagnosis period, stage, grade at diagnosis, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), 1L treatment regimen, and response to 1L treatment. These results suggest that in FL patients who do not experience disease progression after 1L treatment in real‐world settings, MR is associated with a significant improvement in both PFS and OS. Maintenance therapy should be considered in FL patients who successfully complete and respond to 1L therapy.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T21:08:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8499b8c9b6b045c18a609fd2d80fd1a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T21:08:19Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-8499b8c9b6b045c18a609fd2d80fd1a52022-12-22T01:33:33ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342020-10-019207537754710.1002/cam4.3420Maintenance rituximab in Veterans with follicular lymphomaAhmad S. Halwani0Kelli M. Rasmussen1Vikas Patil2Deborah Morreall3Catherine Li4Christina Yong5Zachary Burningham6Keith Dawson7Anthony Masaquel8Kevin Henderson9Elisha DeLong‐Sieg10Brian C. Sauer11Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies Huntsman Cancer Institute Salt Lake City Utah USADivision of Epidemiology VERITAS University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USADivision of Epidemiology VERITAS University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USADivision of Epidemiology VERITAS University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USADivision of Epidemiology VERITAS University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USADivision of Epidemiology VERITAS University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USADivision of Epidemiology VERITAS University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USAUS Medical Affairs Genentech Inc South San Francisco CA USAUS Medical Affairs Genentech Inc South San Francisco CA USAUS Medical Affairs Genentech Inc South San Francisco CA USAUS Medical Affairs Genentech Inc South San Francisco CA USADivision of Epidemiology VERITAS University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USAAbstract Real‐world practice patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), including the adoption of maintenance rituximab (MR) therapy in the United States (US), have been reported in few studies since the release of the National LymphoCare Study almost a decade ago. We analyzed data from the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), to identify rates of adoption and effectiveness of MR in FL patients after first‐line (1L) treatment. We identified previously untreated patients with FL in the VHA between 2006 and 2014 who achieved at least stable disease after chemoimmunotherapy or immunotherapy. Among these patients, those who initiated MR within 238 days of 1L composed the MR group, whereas those who did not were classified as the non‐MR group. We examined the effect of MR on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 676 patients met our inclusion criteria, of whom 300 received MR. MR was associated with significant PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.55, P < .001) and OS (HR = 0.53, P = .005) compared to the non‐MR group, after adjusting by age, sex, ethnicity, geographic region, diagnosis period, stage, grade at diagnosis, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), 1L treatment regimen, and response to 1L treatment. These results suggest that in FL patients who do not experience disease progression after 1L treatment in real‐world settings, MR is associated with a significant improvement in both PFS and OS. Maintenance therapy should be considered in FL patients who successfully complete and respond to 1L therapy.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3420clinical observationsepidemiologyhaematological cancerlymphoma
spellingShingle Ahmad S. Halwani
Kelli M. Rasmussen
Vikas Patil
Deborah Morreall
Catherine Li
Christina Yong
Zachary Burningham
Keith Dawson
Anthony Masaquel
Kevin Henderson
Elisha DeLong‐Sieg
Brian C. Sauer
Maintenance rituximab in Veterans with follicular lymphoma
Cancer Medicine
clinical observations
epidemiology
haematological cancer
lymphoma
title Maintenance rituximab in Veterans with follicular lymphoma
title_full Maintenance rituximab in Veterans with follicular lymphoma
title_fullStr Maintenance rituximab in Veterans with follicular lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Maintenance rituximab in Veterans with follicular lymphoma
title_short Maintenance rituximab in Veterans with follicular lymphoma
title_sort maintenance rituximab in veterans with follicular lymphoma
topic clinical observations
epidemiology
haematological cancer
lymphoma
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3420
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadshalwani maintenancerituximabinveteranswithfollicularlymphoma
AT kellimrasmussen maintenancerituximabinveteranswithfollicularlymphoma
AT vikaspatil maintenancerituximabinveteranswithfollicularlymphoma
AT deborahmorreall maintenancerituximabinveteranswithfollicularlymphoma
AT catherineli maintenancerituximabinveteranswithfollicularlymphoma
AT christinayong maintenancerituximabinveteranswithfollicularlymphoma
AT zacharyburningham maintenancerituximabinveteranswithfollicularlymphoma
AT keithdawson maintenancerituximabinveteranswithfollicularlymphoma
AT anthonymasaquel maintenancerituximabinveteranswithfollicularlymphoma
AT kevinhenderson maintenancerituximabinveteranswithfollicularlymphoma
AT elishadelongsieg maintenancerituximabinveteranswithfollicularlymphoma
AT briancsauer maintenancerituximabinveteranswithfollicularlymphoma