A geospatial model to determine the spatial cost-efficiency of anticoagulation drug therapy: Patients’ perspective

Most atrial fibrillation (AF) patients need anticoagulation management to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events and stroke. Currently, two major drug therapies are available: warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). This study examined the spatial costs of these therapies and derived the le...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mikko Pyykönen, Aapeli Leminen, Juho Tynkkynen, Markku Tykkyläinen, Tiina Laatikainen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2019-11-01
Series:Geospatial Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.geospatialhealth.net/index.php/gh/article/view/809
_version_ 1811264275976552448
author Mikko Pyykönen
Aapeli Leminen
Juho Tynkkynen
Markku Tykkyläinen
Tiina Laatikainen
author_facet Mikko Pyykönen
Aapeli Leminen
Juho Tynkkynen
Markku Tykkyläinen
Tiina Laatikainen
author_sort Mikko Pyykönen
collection DOAJ
description Most atrial fibrillation (AF) patients need anticoagulation management to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events and stroke. Currently, two major drug therapies are available: warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). This study examined the spatial costs of these therapies and derived the least-cost market areas for both therapies in the study area. The concepts of spatial costs and the principles of forming market areas were used as theoretical starting points, and the patients’ travel, time-loss, and medication cost parameters combined with geographical information systems methods were incorporated into the geospatial model. Results showed that for AF patients who live near the international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring sample collection point and have less than 15 annual INR monitoring visits, warfarin therapy resulted in the lowest cost regardless of patient’s travel mode and their assumed working or retirement status. If the AF patient needs more frequent INR monitoring visits or lives farther from the nearest sample collection point, DOAC would be the least costly option. The modelled results reveal the variety and importance of patients’ cost of time loss and travel costs when a physician selects the appropriate anticoagulation therapy.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T20:00:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-84a94682acdd4f318ffc601f972b0e58
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1827-1987
1970-7096
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T20:00:12Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher PAGEPress Publications
record_format Article
series Geospatial Health
spelling doaj.art-84a94682acdd4f318ffc601f972b0e582022-12-22T03:18:33ZengPAGEPress PublicationsGeospatial Health1827-19871970-70962019-11-0114210.4081/gh.2019.809A geospatial model to determine the spatial cost-efficiency of anticoagulation drug therapy: Patients’ perspectiveMikko Pyykönen0Aapeli Leminen1Juho Tynkkynen2Markku Tykkyläinen3Tiina Laatikainen4Department of Geographical and Historical Studies, University of Eastern Finland, JoensuuDepartment of Geographical and Historical Studies, University of Eastern Finland, JoensuuFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere; Department of Radiology, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, HämeenlinnaDepartment of Geographical and Historical Studies, University of Eastern Finland, JoensuuInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio; Joint Municipal Authority for North Karelia Social and Health Services, Joensuu; Department of Public Health Solutions, National Institute for Health and Welfare, HelsinkiMost atrial fibrillation (AF) patients need anticoagulation management to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events and stroke. Currently, two major drug therapies are available: warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). This study examined the spatial costs of these therapies and derived the least-cost market areas for both therapies in the study area. The concepts of spatial costs and the principles of forming market areas were used as theoretical starting points, and the patients’ travel, time-loss, and medication cost parameters combined with geographical information systems methods were incorporated into the geospatial model. Results showed that for AF patients who live near the international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring sample collection point and have less than 15 annual INR monitoring visits, warfarin therapy resulted in the lowest cost regardless of patient’s travel mode and their assumed working or retirement status. If the AF patient needs more frequent INR monitoring visits or lives farther from the nearest sample collection point, DOAC would be the least costly option. The modelled results reveal the variety and importance of patients’ cost of time loss and travel costs when a physician selects the appropriate anticoagulation therapy.https://www.geospatialhealth.net/index.php/gh/article/view/809Geographical information systemsAtrial fibrillationLeast-cost therapyMarket areasNetwork analysis
spellingShingle Mikko Pyykönen
Aapeli Leminen
Juho Tynkkynen
Markku Tykkyläinen
Tiina Laatikainen
A geospatial model to determine the spatial cost-efficiency of anticoagulation drug therapy: Patients’ perspective
Geospatial Health
Geographical information systems
Atrial fibrillation
Least-cost therapy
Market areas
Network analysis
title A geospatial model to determine the spatial cost-efficiency of anticoagulation drug therapy: Patients’ perspective
title_full A geospatial model to determine the spatial cost-efficiency of anticoagulation drug therapy: Patients’ perspective
title_fullStr A geospatial model to determine the spatial cost-efficiency of anticoagulation drug therapy: Patients’ perspective
title_full_unstemmed A geospatial model to determine the spatial cost-efficiency of anticoagulation drug therapy: Patients’ perspective
title_short A geospatial model to determine the spatial cost-efficiency of anticoagulation drug therapy: Patients’ perspective
title_sort geospatial model to determine the spatial cost efficiency of anticoagulation drug therapy patients perspective
topic Geographical information systems
Atrial fibrillation
Least-cost therapy
Market areas
Network analysis
url https://www.geospatialhealth.net/index.php/gh/article/view/809
work_keys_str_mv AT mikkopyykonen ageospatialmodeltodeterminethespatialcostefficiencyofanticoagulationdrugtherapypatientsperspective
AT aapelileminen ageospatialmodeltodeterminethespatialcostefficiencyofanticoagulationdrugtherapypatientsperspective
AT juhotynkkynen ageospatialmodeltodeterminethespatialcostefficiencyofanticoagulationdrugtherapypatientsperspective
AT markkutykkylainen ageospatialmodeltodeterminethespatialcostefficiencyofanticoagulationdrugtherapypatientsperspective
AT tiinalaatikainen ageospatialmodeltodeterminethespatialcostefficiencyofanticoagulationdrugtherapypatientsperspective
AT mikkopyykonen geospatialmodeltodeterminethespatialcostefficiencyofanticoagulationdrugtherapypatientsperspective
AT aapelileminen geospatialmodeltodeterminethespatialcostefficiencyofanticoagulationdrugtherapypatientsperspective
AT juhotynkkynen geospatialmodeltodeterminethespatialcostefficiencyofanticoagulationdrugtherapypatientsperspective
AT markkutykkylainen geospatialmodeltodeterminethespatialcostefficiencyofanticoagulationdrugtherapypatientsperspective
AT tiinalaatikainen geospatialmodeltodeterminethespatialcostefficiencyofanticoagulationdrugtherapypatientsperspective