Phytoremediation of nickel by quinoa: Morphological and physiological response.
The amount of soil contaminated with heavy metal increases due to urbanization, industrialization, and anthropogenic activities. Quinoa is considered a useful candidate in the remediation of such soil. In this pot experiment, the phytoextraction capacity of quinoa lines (A1, A2, A7, and A9) against...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262309 |
_version_ | 1811302572439371776 |
---|---|
author | Muhammad Haseeb Shahid Iqbal Muhammad Bilal Hafeez Muhammad Sohail Saddiq Noreen Zahra Ali Raza Muhammad Usman Lbrahim Javaid Iqbal Muhammad Kamran Qasim Ali Talha Javed Hayssam M Ali Manzer H Siddiqui |
author_facet | Muhammad Haseeb Shahid Iqbal Muhammad Bilal Hafeez Muhammad Sohail Saddiq Noreen Zahra Ali Raza Muhammad Usman Lbrahim Javaid Iqbal Muhammad Kamran Qasim Ali Talha Javed Hayssam M Ali Manzer H Siddiqui |
author_sort | Muhammad Haseeb |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The amount of soil contaminated with heavy metal increases due to urbanization, industrialization, and anthropogenic activities. Quinoa is considered a useful candidate in the remediation of such soil. In this pot experiment, the phytoextraction capacity of quinoa lines (A1, A2, A7, and A9) against different nickel (Ni) concentrations (0, 50, and 100 mg kg-1) were investigated. Required Ni concentrations were developed in polythene bags filled with sandy loam soil using nickel nitrate salt prior to two months of sowing and kept sealed up to sowing. Results showed that translocation of Ni increased from roots to shoots with an increase in soil Ni concentration in all lines. A2 line accumulated high Ni in leaf compared to the root as depicted by translocation factor 3.09 and 3.21 when grown at soil having 50 and 100 Ni mg kg-1, respectively. While, in the case of root, A7 accumulated high Ni followed by A9, A1, and A2, respectively. There was a 5-7% increased seed yield by 50 mg kg-1 Ni in all except A1 compared to control. However, growth and yield declined with a further increase in Ni level. The maximum reduction in yield was noticed in A9, which was strongly linked with poor physiological performance, e.g., chlorophyll a, b, and phenolic contents. Ni concentrations in the seed of all lines were within the permissible value set (67 ppm) by FAO/WHO. The result of the present study suggests that quinoa is a better accumulator of Ni. This species can provide the scope of decontamination of heavy metal polluted soil. The screened line can be used for future quinoa breeding programs for bioremediation and phytoextraction purpose. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T07:30:21Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-84afd492b9d9490f9e3e7469ff29dd1b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T07:30:21Z |
publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-84afd492b9d9490f9e3e7469ff29dd1b2022-12-22T02:56:22ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01171e026230910.1371/journal.pone.0262309Phytoremediation of nickel by quinoa: Morphological and physiological response.Muhammad HaseebShahid IqbalMuhammad Bilal HafeezMuhammad Sohail SaddiqNoreen ZahraAli RazaMuhammad Usman LbrahimJavaid IqbalMuhammad KamranQasim AliTalha JavedHayssam M AliManzer H SiddiquiThe amount of soil contaminated with heavy metal increases due to urbanization, industrialization, and anthropogenic activities. Quinoa is considered a useful candidate in the remediation of such soil. In this pot experiment, the phytoextraction capacity of quinoa lines (A1, A2, A7, and A9) against different nickel (Ni) concentrations (0, 50, and 100 mg kg-1) were investigated. Required Ni concentrations were developed in polythene bags filled with sandy loam soil using nickel nitrate salt prior to two months of sowing and kept sealed up to sowing. Results showed that translocation of Ni increased from roots to shoots with an increase in soil Ni concentration in all lines. A2 line accumulated high Ni in leaf compared to the root as depicted by translocation factor 3.09 and 3.21 when grown at soil having 50 and 100 Ni mg kg-1, respectively. While, in the case of root, A7 accumulated high Ni followed by A9, A1, and A2, respectively. There was a 5-7% increased seed yield by 50 mg kg-1 Ni in all except A1 compared to control. However, growth and yield declined with a further increase in Ni level. The maximum reduction in yield was noticed in A9, which was strongly linked with poor physiological performance, e.g., chlorophyll a, b, and phenolic contents. Ni concentrations in the seed of all lines were within the permissible value set (67 ppm) by FAO/WHO. The result of the present study suggests that quinoa is a better accumulator of Ni. This species can provide the scope of decontamination of heavy metal polluted soil. The screened line can be used for future quinoa breeding programs for bioremediation and phytoextraction purpose.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262309 |
spellingShingle | Muhammad Haseeb Shahid Iqbal Muhammad Bilal Hafeez Muhammad Sohail Saddiq Noreen Zahra Ali Raza Muhammad Usman Lbrahim Javaid Iqbal Muhammad Kamran Qasim Ali Talha Javed Hayssam M Ali Manzer H Siddiqui Phytoremediation of nickel by quinoa: Morphological and physiological response. PLoS ONE |
title | Phytoremediation of nickel by quinoa: Morphological and physiological response. |
title_full | Phytoremediation of nickel by quinoa: Morphological and physiological response. |
title_fullStr | Phytoremediation of nickel by quinoa: Morphological and physiological response. |
title_full_unstemmed | Phytoremediation of nickel by quinoa: Morphological and physiological response. |
title_short | Phytoremediation of nickel by quinoa: Morphological and physiological response. |
title_sort | phytoremediation of nickel by quinoa morphological and physiological response |
url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262309 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muhammadhaseeb phytoremediationofnickelbyquinoamorphologicalandphysiologicalresponse AT shahidiqbal phytoremediationofnickelbyquinoamorphologicalandphysiologicalresponse AT muhammadbilalhafeez phytoremediationofnickelbyquinoamorphologicalandphysiologicalresponse AT muhammadsohailsaddiq phytoremediationofnickelbyquinoamorphologicalandphysiologicalresponse AT noreenzahra phytoremediationofnickelbyquinoamorphologicalandphysiologicalresponse AT aliraza phytoremediationofnickelbyquinoamorphologicalandphysiologicalresponse AT muhammadusmanlbrahim phytoremediationofnickelbyquinoamorphologicalandphysiologicalresponse AT javaidiqbal phytoremediationofnickelbyquinoamorphologicalandphysiologicalresponse AT muhammadkamran phytoremediationofnickelbyquinoamorphologicalandphysiologicalresponse AT qasimali phytoremediationofnickelbyquinoamorphologicalandphysiologicalresponse AT talhajaved phytoremediationofnickelbyquinoamorphologicalandphysiologicalresponse AT hayssammali phytoremediationofnickelbyquinoamorphologicalandphysiologicalresponse AT manzerhsiddiqui phytoremediationofnickelbyquinoamorphologicalandphysiologicalresponse |