Evaluating Geospatial Data Adequacy for Integrated Risk Assessments: A Malaria Risk Use Case

International policy and humanitarian guidance emphasize the need for precise, subnational malaria risk assessments with cross-regional comparability. Spatially explicit indicator-based assessments can support humanitarian aid organizations in identifying and localizing vulnerable populations for sc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Linda Petutschnig, Thomas Clemen, E. Sophia Klaußner, Ulfia Clemen, Stefan Lang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/13/2/33
_version_ 1797298087437271040
author Linda Petutschnig
Thomas Clemen
E. Sophia Klaußner
Ulfia Clemen
Stefan Lang
author_facet Linda Petutschnig
Thomas Clemen
E. Sophia Klaußner
Ulfia Clemen
Stefan Lang
author_sort Linda Petutschnig
collection DOAJ
description International policy and humanitarian guidance emphasize the need for precise, subnational malaria risk assessments with cross-regional comparability. Spatially explicit indicator-based assessments can support humanitarian aid organizations in identifying and localizing vulnerable populations for scaling resources and prioritizing aid delivery. However, the reliability of these assessments is often uncertain due to data quality issues. This article introduces a data evaluation framework to assist risk modelers in evaluating data adequacy. We operationalize the concept of “data adequacy” by considering “quality by design” (suitability) and “quality of conformance” (reliability). Based on a use case we developed in collaboration with Médecins Sans Frontières, we assessed data sources popular in spatial malaria risk assessments and related domains, including data from the Malaria Atlas Project, a healthcare facility database, WorldPop population counts, Climate Hazards group Infrared Precipitation with Stations (CHIRPS) precipitation estimates, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) precipitation forecast, and Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED) conflict events data. Our findings indicate that data availability is generally not a bottleneck, and data producers effectively communicate contextual information pertaining to sources, methodology, limitations and uncertainties. However, determining such data’s adequacy definitively for supporting humanitarian intervention planning remains challenging due to potential inaccuracies, incompleteness or outdatedness that are difficult to quantify. Nevertheless, the data hold value for awareness raising, advocacy and recognizing trends and patterns valuable for humanitarian contexts. We contribute a domain-agnostic, systematic approach to geodata adequacy evaluation, with the aim of enhancing geospatial risk assessments, facilitating evidence-based decisions.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:29:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-84bf1695b0b14f94a1dc22b27f142c9c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2220-9964
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:29:48Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
spelling doaj.art-84bf1695b0b14f94a1dc22b27f142c9c2024-02-23T15:19:04ZengMDPI AGISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information2220-99642024-01-011323310.3390/ijgi13020033Evaluating Geospatial Data Adequacy for Integrated Risk Assessments: A Malaria Risk Use CaseLinda Petutschnig0Thomas Clemen1E. Sophia Klaußner2Ulfia Clemen3Stefan Lang4Christian Doppler Laboratory for Geospatial and EO-Based Humanitarian Technologies, Department of Geoinformatics—Z_GIS, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, AustriaDepartment of Computer Science, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Berliner Tor 7, 20099 Hamburg, GermanyChristian Doppler Laboratory for Geospatial and EO-Based Humanitarian Technologies, Department of Geoinformatics—Z_GIS, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, AustriaDepartment of Computer Science, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Berliner Tor 7, 20099 Hamburg, GermanyChristian Doppler Laboratory for Geospatial and EO-Based Humanitarian Technologies, Department of Geoinformatics—Z_GIS, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, AustriaInternational policy and humanitarian guidance emphasize the need for precise, subnational malaria risk assessments with cross-regional comparability. Spatially explicit indicator-based assessments can support humanitarian aid organizations in identifying and localizing vulnerable populations for scaling resources and prioritizing aid delivery. However, the reliability of these assessments is often uncertain due to data quality issues. This article introduces a data evaluation framework to assist risk modelers in evaluating data adequacy. We operationalize the concept of “data adequacy” by considering “quality by design” (suitability) and “quality of conformance” (reliability). Based on a use case we developed in collaboration with Médecins Sans Frontières, we assessed data sources popular in spatial malaria risk assessments and related domains, including data from the Malaria Atlas Project, a healthcare facility database, WorldPop population counts, Climate Hazards group Infrared Precipitation with Stations (CHIRPS) precipitation estimates, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) precipitation forecast, and Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED) conflict events data. Our findings indicate that data availability is generally not a bottleneck, and data producers effectively communicate contextual information pertaining to sources, methodology, limitations and uncertainties. However, determining such data’s adequacy definitively for supporting humanitarian intervention planning remains challenging due to potential inaccuracies, incompleteness or outdatedness that are difficult to quantify. Nevertheless, the data hold value for awareness raising, advocacy and recognizing trends and patterns valuable for humanitarian contexts. We contribute a domain-agnostic, systematic approach to geodata adequacy evaluation, with the aim of enhancing geospatial risk assessments, facilitating evidence-based decisions.https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/13/2/33geospatial datadata qualityrisk assessmentmalaria riskspatial indicators
spellingShingle Linda Petutschnig
Thomas Clemen
E. Sophia Klaußner
Ulfia Clemen
Stefan Lang
Evaluating Geospatial Data Adequacy for Integrated Risk Assessments: A Malaria Risk Use Case
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
geospatial data
data quality
risk assessment
malaria risk
spatial indicators
title Evaluating Geospatial Data Adequacy for Integrated Risk Assessments: A Malaria Risk Use Case
title_full Evaluating Geospatial Data Adequacy for Integrated Risk Assessments: A Malaria Risk Use Case
title_fullStr Evaluating Geospatial Data Adequacy for Integrated Risk Assessments: A Malaria Risk Use Case
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Geospatial Data Adequacy for Integrated Risk Assessments: A Malaria Risk Use Case
title_short Evaluating Geospatial Data Adequacy for Integrated Risk Assessments: A Malaria Risk Use Case
title_sort evaluating geospatial data adequacy for integrated risk assessments a malaria risk use case
topic geospatial data
data quality
risk assessment
malaria risk
spatial indicators
url https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/13/2/33
work_keys_str_mv AT lindapetutschnig evaluatinggeospatialdataadequacyforintegratedriskassessmentsamalariariskusecase
AT thomasclemen evaluatinggeospatialdataadequacyforintegratedriskassessmentsamalariariskusecase
AT esophiaklaußner evaluatinggeospatialdataadequacyforintegratedriskassessmentsamalariariskusecase
AT ulfiaclemen evaluatinggeospatialdataadequacyforintegratedriskassessmentsamalariariskusecase
AT stefanlang evaluatinggeospatialdataadequacyforintegratedriskassessmentsamalariariskusecase