Evaluation of Nuclear Morphometry and Ki-67 Proliferative Marker in Astrocytomas: An Ambispective Study

Introduction: Astrocytomas are the commonest primary Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours. Its diagnosis is based on histopathological criteria defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO) 2016 that grades astrocytoma into four grades. The subjective nature of WHO grading has prompted for more obj...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Palak Nanda, Sapna Patel, Apoorva Cherukuri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/17378/58640_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(SC_KM)_PFA(SC_KM)__PN(KM).pdf
_version_ 1811173166183088128
author Palak Nanda
Sapna Patel
Apoorva Cherukuri
author_facet Palak Nanda
Sapna Patel
Apoorva Cherukuri
author_sort Palak Nanda
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Astrocytomas are the commonest primary Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours. Its diagnosis is based on histopathological criteria defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO) 2016 that grades astrocytoma into four grades. The subjective nature of WHO grading has prompted for more objective methods to evaluate nuclear features. Furthermore, Ki-67, a marker of cellular proliferation is a useful diagnostic tool that also helps in prognostic evaluation and to plan adjuvant therapy in astrocytomas. Aim: To evaluate the nuclear morphometry and Ki-67 proliferative marker in astrocytomas and to assess the relationship of WHO grade with proliferative activity using Ki-67 immunostaining. Materials and Methods: This ambispective study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India, with a total duration of four years (October 2017 to September 2021). From 35 astrocytoma cases, Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained slides were retrieved and reviewed appropriately by two pathologists and graded using the WHO criteria. Nuclear morphometric analysis was performed on the H&E slides using Olympus BX-41 research microscope. The parameters evaluated were mean nuclear length, mean nuclear diameter, mean nuclear perimeter, mean nuclear area, Mean Nuclear Roundness Factor (MNRF) and mean nuclear ellipse form. The cases were then stained with Ki-67 antibody. The relationships between WHO grade of astrocytoma and nuclear morphometry and WHO grade with proliferative index was analysed. Results: According to WHO grading, 4 (11.4%) cases were grade 1, 12 (34.3%) grade 2, six (17.1%) grade 3 and 13 (37.1%) grade 4. Significant correlation was seen between WHO grading and mean nuclear length, diameter, perimeter, area and Ki-67 with p-value <0.001. Conclusion: Astrocytoma is an extremely heterogeneous disease with unpredictable outcome. The widely used WHO grading is subjective, while nuclear morphometry, using computer assisted image analysis, can ensure more objective assessment. The Ki-67 index could provide valuable information and may compliment the other parameters.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:42:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-84c4212c9c61478ebb469bae0771f8c4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:42:16Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-84c4212c9c61478ebb469bae0771f8c42023-02-03T09:19:53ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2023-01-01171EC15EC2010.7860/JCDR/2023/58640.17378Evaluation of Nuclear Morphometry and Ki-67 Proliferative Marker in Astrocytomas: An Ambispective StudyPalak Nanda0Sapna Patel1Apoorva Cherukuri2Tutor Cum Postgraduate Student, Department of Pathology, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.Student, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.Introduction: Astrocytomas are the commonest primary Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours. Its diagnosis is based on histopathological criteria defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO) 2016 that grades astrocytoma into four grades. The subjective nature of WHO grading has prompted for more objective methods to evaluate nuclear features. Furthermore, Ki-67, a marker of cellular proliferation is a useful diagnostic tool that also helps in prognostic evaluation and to plan adjuvant therapy in astrocytomas. Aim: To evaluate the nuclear morphometry and Ki-67 proliferative marker in astrocytomas and to assess the relationship of WHO grade with proliferative activity using Ki-67 immunostaining. Materials and Methods: This ambispective study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India, with a total duration of four years (October 2017 to September 2021). From 35 astrocytoma cases, Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained slides were retrieved and reviewed appropriately by two pathologists and graded using the WHO criteria. Nuclear morphometric analysis was performed on the H&E slides using Olympus BX-41 research microscope. The parameters evaluated were mean nuclear length, mean nuclear diameter, mean nuclear perimeter, mean nuclear area, Mean Nuclear Roundness Factor (MNRF) and mean nuclear ellipse form. The cases were then stained with Ki-67 antibody. The relationships between WHO grade of astrocytoma and nuclear morphometry and WHO grade with proliferative index was analysed. Results: According to WHO grading, 4 (11.4%) cases were grade 1, 12 (34.3%) grade 2, six (17.1%) grade 3 and 13 (37.1%) grade 4. Significant correlation was seen between WHO grading and mean nuclear length, diameter, perimeter, area and Ki-67 with p-value <0.001. Conclusion: Astrocytoma is an extremely heterogeneous disease with unpredictable outcome. The widely used WHO grading is subjective, while nuclear morphometry, using computer assisted image analysis, can ensure more objective assessment. The Ki-67 index could provide valuable information and may compliment the other parameters.https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/17378/58640_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(SC_KM)_PFA(SC_KM)__PN(KM).pdfgliomashistopathological gradingproliferative index
spellingShingle Palak Nanda
Sapna Patel
Apoorva Cherukuri
Evaluation of Nuclear Morphometry and Ki-67 Proliferative Marker in Astrocytomas: An Ambispective Study
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
gliomas
histopathological grading
proliferative index
title Evaluation of Nuclear Morphometry and Ki-67 Proliferative Marker in Astrocytomas: An Ambispective Study
title_full Evaluation of Nuclear Morphometry and Ki-67 Proliferative Marker in Astrocytomas: An Ambispective Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Nuclear Morphometry and Ki-67 Proliferative Marker in Astrocytomas: An Ambispective Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Nuclear Morphometry and Ki-67 Proliferative Marker in Astrocytomas: An Ambispective Study
title_short Evaluation of Nuclear Morphometry and Ki-67 Proliferative Marker in Astrocytomas: An Ambispective Study
title_sort evaluation of nuclear morphometry and ki 67 proliferative marker in astrocytomas an ambispective study
topic gliomas
histopathological grading
proliferative index
url https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/17378/58640_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(SC_KM)_PFA(SC_KM)__PN(KM).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT palaknanda evaluationofnuclearmorphometryandki67proliferativemarkerinastrocytomasanambispectivestudy
AT sapnapatel evaluationofnuclearmorphometryandki67proliferativemarkerinastrocytomasanambispectivestudy
AT apoorvacherukuri evaluationofnuclearmorphometryandki67proliferativemarkerinastrocytomasanambispectivestudy