Assessment of Integration between Lactic Acid, Biogas and Hydrochar Production in OFMSW Plants
Biological treatments such as anaerobic digestion and composting are known to be the most widespread methods to deal with Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW). The production of biogas, a mix of methane and carbon dioxide, is worth but alone cannot solve the problems of waste disposal a...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6593 |
_version_ | 1797544758871064576 |
---|---|
author | Lucio Zaccariello Maria Laura Mastellone Luisa Ida D’Amelia Michelina Catauro Biagio Morrone |
author_facet | Lucio Zaccariello Maria Laura Mastellone Luisa Ida D’Amelia Michelina Catauro Biagio Morrone |
author_sort | Lucio Zaccariello |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Biological treatments such as anaerobic digestion and composting are known to be the most widespread methods to deal with Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW). The production of biogas, a mix of methane and carbon dioxide, is worth but alone cannot solve the problems of waste disposal and recovery; moreover, the digestate could be stabilized by aerobic stabilization, which is one of the most widespread methods. The anaerobic digestion + composting integration converts 10% to 14% of the OFMSW into biogas, about 35–40% into compost and 35–40% into leachate. The economic sustainability could be rather increased by integrating the whole system with lactic acid production, because of the high added value and by substituting the composting process with the hydrothermal carbonization process. The assessment of this integrated scenario in term of mass balance demonstrates that the recovery of useful products with a potentially high economic added value increases, at the same time reducing the waste streams outgoing the plant. The economic evaluation of the operating costs for the traditional and the alternative systems confirms that the integration is a valid alternative and the most interesting solution is the utilization of the leachate produced during the anaerobic digestion process instead of fresh water required for the hydrothermal carbonization process. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T14:04:58Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-84ce4dbd1f0a465ba635098ba230bd26 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1996-1073 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T14:04:58Z |
publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Energies |
spelling | doaj.art-84ce4dbd1f0a465ba635098ba230bd262023-11-21T00:46:01ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-12-011324659310.3390/en13246593Assessment of Integration between Lactic Acid, Biogas and Hydrochar Production in OFMSW PlantsLucio Zaccariello0Maria Laura Mastellone1Luisa Ida D’Amelia2Michelina Catauro3Biagio Morrone4Department DISTABIF, Università della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 81100 Caserta, ItalyDepartment DISTABIF, Università della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 81100 Caserta, ItalyDepartment of Engineering, Università della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 81031 Aversa, ItalyDepartment of Engineering, Università della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 81031 Aversa, ItalyDepartment of Engineering, Università della Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 81031 Aversa, ItalyBiological treatments such as anaerobic digestion and composting are known to be the most widespread methods to deal with Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW). The production of biogas, a mix of methane and carbon dioxide, is worth but alone cannot solve the problems of waste disposal and recovery; moreover, the digestate could be stabilized by aerobic stabilization, which is one of the most widespread methods. The anaerobic digestion + composting integration converts 10% to 14% of the OFMSW into biogas, about 35–40% into compost and 35–40% into leachate. The economic sustainability could be rather increased by integrating the whole system with lactic acid production, because of the high added value and by substituting the composting process with the hydrothermal carbonization process. The assessment of this integrated scenario in term of mass balance demonstrates that the recovery of useful products with a potentially high economic added value increases, at the same time reducing the waste streams outgoing the plant. The economic evaluation of the operating costs for the traditional and the alternative systems confirms that the integration is a valid alternative and the most interesting solution is the utilization of the leachate produced during the anaerobic digestion process instead of fresh water required for the hydrothermal carbonization process.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6593biogaslactic acidhydrocharleachatefood wasteanaerobic digestion |
spellingShingle | Lucio Zaccariello Maria Laura Mastellone Luisa Ida D’Amelia Michelina Catauro Biagio Morrone Assessment of Integration between Lactic Acid, Biogas and Hydrochar Production in OFMSW Plants Energies biogas lactic acid hydrochar leachate food waste anaerobic digestion |
title | Assessment of Integration between Lactic Acid, Biogas and Hydrochar Production in OFMSW Plants |
title_full | Assessment of Integration between Lactic Acid, Biogas and Hydrochar Production in OFMSW Plants |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Integration between Lactic Acid, Biogas and Hydrochar Production in OFMSW Plants |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Integration between Lactic Acid, Biogas and Hydrochar Production in OFMSW Plants |
title_short | Assessment of Integration between Lactic Acid, Biogas and Hydrochar Production in OFMSW Plants |
title_sort | assessment of integration between lactic acid biogas and hydrochar production in ofmsw plants |
topic | biogas lactic acid hydrochar leachate food waste anaerobic digestion |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6593 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luciozaccariello assessmentofintegrationbetweenlacticacidbiogasandhydrocharproductioninofmswplants AT marialauramastellone assessmentofintegrationbetweenlacticacidbiogasandhydrocharproductioninofmswplants AT luisaidadamelia assessmentofintegrationbetweenlacticacidbiogasandhydrocharproductioninofmswplants AT michelinacatauro assessmentofintegrationbetweenlacticacidbiogasandhydrocharproductioninofmswplants AT biagiomorrone assessmentofintegrationbetweenlacticacidbiogasandhydrocharproductioninofmswplants |