Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs

Abstract Background The objective of the present study was to investigate how variation in the faecal microbial composition is associated with variation in average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT), daily feed intake (DFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and residual feed intake (RFI), using d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amir Aliakbari, Olivier Zemb, Laurent Cauquil, Céline Barilly, Yvon Billon, Hélène Gilbert
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: BMC 2022-04-01
Series:Genetics Selection Evolution
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-022-00717-7
_version_ 1811338815734808576
author Amir Aliakbari
Olivier Zemb
Laurent Cauquil
Céline Barilly
Yvon Billon
Hélène Gilbert
author_facet Amir Aliakbari
Olivier Zemb
Laurent Cauquil
Céline Barilly
Yvon Billon
Hélène Gilbert
author_sort Amir Aliakbari
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The objective of the present study was to investigate how variation in the faecal microbial composition is associated with variation in average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT), daily feed intake (DFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and residual feed intake (RFI), using data from two experimental pig lines that were divergent for feed efficiency. Estimates of microbiability were obtained by a Bayesian approach using animal mixed models. Microbiome-wide association analyses (MWAS) were conducted by single-operational taxonomic units (OTU) regression and by back-solving solutions of best linear unbiased prediction using a microbiome covariance matrix. In addition, accuracy of microbiome predictions of phenotypes using the microbiome covariance matrix was evaluated. Results Estimates of heritability ranged from 0.31 ± 0.13 for FCR to 0.51 ± 0.10 for BFT. Estimates of microbiability were lower than those of heritability for all traits and were 0.11 ± 0.09 for RFI, 0.20 ± 0.11 for FCR, 0.04 ± 0.03 for DFI, 0.03 ± 0.03 for ADG, and 0.02 ± 0.03 for BFT. Bivariate analyses showed a high microbial correlation of 0.70 ± 0.34 between RFI and FCR. The two approaches used for MWAS showed similar results. Overall, eight OTU with significant or suggestive effects on the five traits were identified. They belonged to the genera and families that are mainly involved in producing short-chain fatty acids and digestive enzymes. Prediction accuracy of phenotypes using a full model including the genetic and microbiota components ranged from 0.60 ± 0.19 to 0.78 ± 0.05. Similar accuracies of predictions of the microbial component were observed using models that did or did not include an additive animal effect, suggesting no interaction with the genetic effect. Conclusions Our results showed substantial associations of the faecal microbiome with feed efficiency related traits but negligible effects with growth traits. Microbiome data incorporated as a covariance matrix can be used to predict phenotypes of animals that do not (yet) have phenotypic information. Connecting breeding environment between training sets and predicted populations could be necessary to obtain reliable microbiome predictions.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T18:17:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-84d66e1b37e64cf9b4dfc42c84aba348
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1297-9686
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-13T18:17:10Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Genetics Selection Evolution
spelling doaj.art-84d66e1b37e64cf9b4dfc42c84aba3482022-12-22T02:35:39ZdeuBMCGenetics Selection Evolution1297-96862022-04-0154111510.1186/s12711-022-00717-7Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigsAmir Aliakbari0Olivier Zemb1Laurent Cauquil2Céline Barilly3Yvon Billon4Hélène Gilbert5GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVTGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVTGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVTGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVTGenESI, INRAEGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVTAbstract Background The objective of the present study was to investigate how variation in the faecal microbial composition is associated with variation in average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT), daily feed intake (DFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and residual feed intake (RFI), using data from two experimental pig lines that were divergent for feed efficiency. Estimates of microbiability were obtained by a Bayesian approach using animal mixed models. Microbiome-wide association analyses (MWAS) were conducted by single-operational taxonomic units (OTU) regression and by back-solving solutions of best linear unbiased prediction using a microbiome covariance matrix. In addition, accuracy of microbiome predictions of phenotypes using the microbiome covariance matrix was evaluated. Results Estimates of heritability ranged from 0.31 ± 0.13 for FCR to 0.51 ± 0.10 for BFT. Estimates of microbiability were lower than those of heritability for all traits and were 0.11 ± 0.09 for RFI, 0.20 ± 0.11 for FCR, 0.04 ± 0.03 for DFI, 0.03 ± 0.03 for ADG, and 0.02 ± 0.03 for BFT. Bivariate analyses showed a high microbial correlation of 0.70 ± 0.34 between RFI and FCR. The two approaches used for MWAS showed similar results. Overall, eight OTU with significant or suggestive effects on the five traits were identified. They belonged to the genera and families that are mainly involved in producing short-chain fatty acids and digestive enzymes. Prediction accuracy of phenotypes using a full model including the genetic and microbiota components ranged from 0.60 ± 0.19 to 0.78 ± 0.05. Similar accuracies of predictions of the microbial component were observed using models that did or did not include an additive animal effect, suggesting no interaction with the genetic effect. Conclusions Our results showed substantial associations of the faecal microbiome with feed efficiency related traits but negligible effects with growth traits. Microbiome data incorporated as a covariance matrix can be used to predict phenotypes of animals that do not (yet) have phenotypic information. Connecting breeding environment between training sets and predicted populations could be necessary to obtain reliable microbiome predictions.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-022-00717-7
spellingShingle Amir Aliakbari
Olivier Zemb
Laurent Cauquil
Céline Barilly
Yvon Billon
Hélène Gilbert
Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs
Genetics Selection Evolution
title Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs
title_full Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs
title_fullStr Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs
title_full_unstemmed Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs
title_short Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs
title_sort microbiability and microbiome wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-022-00717-7
work_keys_str_mv AT amiraliakbari microbiabilityandmicrobiomewideassociationanalysesoffeedefficiencyandperformancetraitsinpigs
AT olivierzemb microbiabilityandmicrobiomewideassociationanalysesoffeedefficiencyandperformancetraitsinpigs
AT laurentcauquil microbiabilityandmicrobiomewideassociationanalysesoffeedefficiencyandperformancetraitsinpigs
AT celinebarilly microbiabilityandmicrobiomewideassociationanalysesoffeedefficiencyandperformancetraitsinpigs
AT yvonbillon microbiabilityandmicrobiomewideassociationanalysesoffeedefficiencyandperformancetraitsinpigs
AT helenegilbert microbiabilityandmicrobiomewideassociationanalysesoffeedefficiencyandperformancetraitsinpigs