Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema Previously Treated in Real-Life Practice: The REALFAc Study

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the main cause of visual impairment in diabetic patients and a chronic disease requiring long-term treatments. The fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant has recently been approved to treat DME in patients considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies. Thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thibaud Mathis, Maxence Papegaey, Cécile Ricard, Amina Rezkallah, Frédéric Matonti, Aditya Sudhalkar, Cristina Vartin, Corinne Dot, Laurent Kodjikian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Pharmaceutics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/14/4/723
_version_ 1797434300174434304
author Thibaud Mathis
Maxence Papegaey
Cécile Ricard
Amina Rezkallah
Frédéric Matonti
Aditya Sudhalkar
Cristina Vartin
Corinne Dot
Laurent Kodjikian
author_facet Thibaud Mathis
Maxence Papegaey
Cécile Ricard
Amina Rezkallah
Frédéric Matonti
Aditya Sudhalkar
Cristina Vartin
Corinne Dot
Laurent Kodjikian
author_sort Thibaud Mathis
collection DOAJ
description Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the main cause of visual impairment in diabetic patients and a chronic disease requiring long-term treatments. The fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant has recently been approved to treat DME in patients considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies. This study evaluates the functional and anatomical efficacy of the FAc implant in real-life practice. A total of 62 eyes with chronic DME were included and followed for a mean of 13.9 (+7.5) months. Previous treatment included at least anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in 83.9% of eyes, dexamethasone implant (DEX-I) in 100% of eyes, vitrectomy in 29.0% of eyes, and laser photocoagulation (either panretinal or focal photocoagulation) in 75.8% of eyes. The mean baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 64.0 (+/−17.2) letters (median: 67.5 letters) with a mean DME duration of 60.3 (+/−30.6) months. The maximum BCVA gain occurred at 21 months with a mean gain of 5.0 (+/−12.7) letters. A total of 50.0% of eyes gained ≥5 letters during follow-up. Patients with lower BCVA at baseline had the lowest final BCVA (<i>p</i> < 0.001) but the highest BCVA gain (<i>p</i> = 0.02). The best overall improvement in mean central macular thickness (CMT) occurred at 18 months (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). The improvement in BCVA was inversely associated with the decrease in CMT and showed a decrease when CMT increased (DME recurrence). According to the history of vitrectomy, we did not find any significant difference in mean final BCVA (<i>p</i> = 0.1) and mean BCVA gain (<i>p</i> = 0.2) between eyes previously vitrectomized or not. A total of 23 eyes (37.1%) required additional treatment for DME, and 17.7% required an IOP-lowering procedure during follow-up. In conclusion, this real-life observational study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the FAc implant in patients with chronic DME already treated with other available therapies.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:30:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-84dd76dfc95741e19b3085395d16271f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4923
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:30:14Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pharmaceutics
spelling doaj.art-84dd76dfc95741e19b3085395d16271f2023-12-01T21:18:29ZengMDPI AGPharmaceutics1999-49232022-03-0114472310.3390/pharmaceutics14040723Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema Previously Treated in Real-Life Practice: The REALFAc StudyThibaud Mathis0Maxence Papegaey1Cécile Ricard2Amina Rezkallah3Frédéric Matonti4Aditya Sudhalkar5Cristina Vartin6Corinne Dot7Laurent Kodjikian8Service d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69004 Lyon, FranceService d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69004 Lyon, FranceStatMed74, 74000 Annecy, FranceService d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69004 Lyon, FranceCentre Monticelli Paradis, 13008 Marseille, FranceAlphavision Augenzentrum, 27568 Bremerhaven, GermanyService d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69004 Lyon, FranceService d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Militaire Desgenettes, 69003 Lyon, FranceService d’Ophtalmologie, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69004 Lyon, FranceDiabetic macular edema (DME) is the main cause of visual impairment in diabetic patients and a chronic disease requiring long-term treatments. The fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant has recently been approved to treat DME in patients considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies. This study evaluates the functional and anatomical efficacy of the FAc implant in real-life practice. A total of 62 eyes with chronic DME were included and followed for a mean of 13.9 (+7.5) months. Previous treatment included at least anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in 83.9% of eyes, dexamethasone implant (DEX-I) in 100% of eyes, vitrectomy in 29.0% of eyes, and laser photocoagulation (either panretinal or focal photocoagulation) in 75.8% of eyes. The mean baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 64.0 (+/−17.2) letters (median: 67.5 letters) with a mean DME duration of 60.3 (+/−30.6) months. The maximum BCVA gain occurred at 21 months with a mean gain of 5.0 (+/−12.7) letters. A total of 50.0% of eyes gained ≥5 letters during follow-up. Patients with lower BCVA at baseline had the lowest final BCVA (<i>p</i> < 0.001) but the highest BCVA gain (<i>p</i> = 0.02). The best overall improvement in mean central macular thickness (CMT) occurred at 18 months (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). The improvement in BCVA was inversely associated with the decrease in CMT and showed a decrease when CMT increased (DME recurrence). According to the history of vitrectomy, we did not find any significant difference in mean final BCVA (<i>p</i> = 0.1) and mean BCVA gain (<i>p</i> = 0.2) between eyes previously vitrectomized or not. A total of 23 eyes (37.1%) required additional treatment for DME, and 17.7% required an IOP-lowering procedure during follow-up. In conclusion, this real-life observational study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the FAc implant in patients with chronic DME already treated with other available therapies.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/14/4/723corticosteroids intravitreal injectiondiabetic macular edemadiabetic retinopathyfluocinolone acetonide implant
spellingShingle Thibaud Mathis
Maxence Papegaey
Cécile Ricard
Amina Rezkallah
Frédéric Matonti
Aditya Sudhalkar
Cristina Vartin
Corinne Dot
Laurent Kodjikian
Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema Previously Treated in Real-Life Practice: The REALFAc Study
Pharmaceutics
corticosteroids intravitreal injection
diabetic macular edema
diabetic retinopathy
fluocinolone acetonide implant
title Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema Previously Treated in Real-Life Practice: The REALFAc Study
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema Previously Treated in Real-Life Practice: The REALFAc Study
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema Previously Treated in Real-Life Practice: The REALFAc Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema Previously Treated in Real-Life Practice: The REALFAc Study
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema Previously Treated in Real-Life Practice: The REALFAc Study
title_sort efficacy and safety of intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant for chronic diabetic macular edema previously treated in real life practice the realfac study
topic corticosteroids intravitreal injection
diabetic macular edema
diabetic retinopathy
fluocinolone acetonide implant
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/14/4/723
work_keys_str_mv AT thibaudmathis efficacyandsafetyofintravitrealfluocinoloneacetonideimplantforchronicdiabeticmacularedemapreviouslytreatedinreallifepracticetherealfacstudy
AT maxencepapegaey efficacyandsafetyofintravitrealfluocinoloneacetonideimplantforchronicdiabeticmacularedemapreviouslytreatedinreallifepracticetherealfacstudy
AT cecilericard efficacyandsafetyofintravitrealfluocinoloneacetonideimplantforchronicdiabeticmacularedemapreviouslytreatedinreallifepracticetherealfacstudy
AT aminarezkallah efficacyandsafetyofintravitrealfluocinoloneacetonideimplantforchronicdiabeticmacularedemapreviouslytreatedinreallifepracticetherealfacstudy
AT fredericmatonti efficacyandsafetyofintravitrealfluocinoloneacetonideimplantforchronicdiabeticmacularedemapreviouslytreatedinreallifepracticetherealfacstudy
AT adityasudhalkar efficacyandsafetyofintravitrealfluocinoloneacetonideimplantforchronicdiabeticmacularedemapreviouslytreatedinreallifepracticetherealfacstudy
AT cristinavartin efficacyandsafetyofintravitrealfluocinoloneacetonideimplantforchronicdiabeticmacularedemapreviouslytreatedinreallifepracticetherealfacstudy
AT corinnedot efficacyandsafetyofintravitrealfluocinoloneacetonideimplantforchronicdiabeticmacularedemapreviouslytreatedinreallifepracticetherealfacstudy
AT laurentkodjikian efficacyandsafetyofintravitrealfluocinoloneacetonideimplantforchronicdiabeticmacularedemapreviouslytreatedinreallifepracticetherealfacstudy