Predilation Ballooning in High Thrombus Laden STEMIs: An Independent Predictor of Slow Flow/No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Emergent Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization

Background. Distal embolization due to microthrombus fragments formed during predilation ballooning is considered one of the possible mechanisms of slow flow/no-reflow (SF/NR). Therefore, this study aimed to compare the incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR during the primary percutaneous coronary inter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajesh Kumar, Danish Qayyum, Ifikhar Ahmed, Lajpat Rai, Ayaz Mir, Romana Awan, Ali Bin Naseer, Abdul Basit, Jawaid Akbar Sial, Tahir Saghir, Nadeem Qamar, Musa Karim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/4012361
_version_ 1797952219319894016
author Rajesh Kumar
Danish Qayyum
Ifikhar Ahmed
Lajpat Rai
Ayaz Mir
Romana Awan
Ali Bin Naseer
Abdul Basit
Jawaid Akbar Sial
Tahir Saghir
Nadeem Qamar
Musa Karim
author_facet Rajesh Kumar
Danish Qayyum
Ifikhar Ahmed
Lajpat Rai
Ayaz Mir
Romana Awan
Ali Bin Naseer
Abdul Basit
Jawaid Akbar Sial
Tahir Saghir
Nadeem Qamar
Musa Karim
author_sort Rajesh Kumar
collection DOAJ
description Background. Distal embolization due to microthrombus fragments formed during predilation ballooning is considered one of the possible mechanisms of slow flow/no-reflow (SF/NR). Therefore, this study aimed to compare the incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR during the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with high thrombus burden (≥4 grade) with and without predilation ballooning for culprit lesion preparation. Methodology. This prospective descriptive cross-sectional study included patients with a high thrombus burden (≥4 grades) who underwent primary PCI. Propensity-matched cohorts of patients with and without predilation ballooning in a 1 : 1 ratio were compared for the incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR. Results. A total of 765 patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary PCI were included in this study. The mean age was 55.75 ± 11.54 years, and 78.6% (601) were males. Predilation ballooning was conducted in 346 (45.2%) patients. The incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR was significantly higher (41.3% vs. 27.4%; p<0.001) in patients with predilation ballooning than in those without preballooning, respectively. The incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR also remained significantly higher for the predilation ballooning cohort with an incidence rate of 41.3% as against 30.1% (p=0.002) for the propensity-matched cohort of patients without predilation ballooning with a relative risk of 1.64 (95% CI: 1.20 to 2.24). Moreover, the in-hospital mortality rate remained higher but insignificant, among patients with and without predilation ballooning (8.1% vs. 4.9%; p=0.090). Conclusion. In conclusion, predilation ballooning can be associated with an increased risk of incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR during primary PCI in patients with high thrombus burden.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T22:43:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-84e12d8523ea4587b6d6e8f5ae34f556
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1540-8183
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T22:43:12Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Hindawi-Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj.art-84e12d8523ea4587b6d6e8f5ae34f5562023-01-16T01:06:10ZengHindawi-WileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology1540-81832023-01-01202310.1155/2023/4012361Predilation Ballooning in High Thrombus Laden STEMIs: An Independent Predictor of Slow Flow/No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Emergent Percutaneous Coronary RevascularizationRajesh Kumar0Danish Qayyum1Ifikhar Ahmed2Lajpat Rai3Ayaz Mir4Romana Awan5Ali Bin Naseer6Abdul Basit7Jawaid Akbar Sial8Tahir Saghir9Nadeem Qamar10Musa Karim11National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD)National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD)National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD)National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD)National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD)National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD)National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD)National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD)National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD)National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD)National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD)National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD)Background. Distal embolization due to microthrombus fragments formed during predilation ballooning is considered one of the possible mechanisms of slow flow/no-reflow (SF/NR). Therefore, this study aimed to compare the incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR during the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with high thrombus burden (≥4 grade) with and without predilation ballooning for culprit lesion preparation. Methodology. This prospective descriptive cross-sectional study included patients with a high thrombus burden (≥4 grades) who underwent primary PCI. Propensity-matched cohorts of patients with and without predilation ballooning in a 1 : 1 ratio were compared for the incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR. Results. A total of 765 patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary PCI were included in this study. The mean age was 55.75 ± 11.54 years, and 78.6% (601) were males. Predilation ballooning was conducted in 346 (45.2%) patients. The incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR was significantly higher (41.3% vs. 27.4%; p<0.001) in patients with predilation ballooning than in those without preballooning, respectively. The incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR also remained significantly higher for the predilation ballooning cohort with an incidence rate of 41.3% as against 30.1% (p=0.002) for the propensity-matched cohort of patients without predilation ballooning with a relative risk of 1.64 (95% CI: 1.20 to 2.24). Moreover, the in-hospital mortality rate remained higher but insignificant, among patients with and without predilation ballooning (8.1% vs. 4.9%; p=0.090). Conclusion. In conclusion, predilation ballooning can be associated with an increased risk of incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR during primary PCI in patients with high thrombus burden.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/4012361
spellingShingle Rajesh Kumar
Danish Qayyum
Ifikhar Ahmed
Lajpat Rai
Ayaz Mir
Romana Awan
Ali Bin Naseer
Abdul Basit
Jawaid Akbar Sial
Tahir Saghir
Nadeem Qamar
Musa Karim
Predilation Ballooning in High Thrombus Laden STEMIs: An Independent Predictor of Slow Flow/No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Emergent Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Predilation Ballooning in High Thrombus Laden STEMIs: An Independent Predictor of Slow Flow/No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Emergent Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
title_full Predilation Ballooning in High Thrombus Laden STEMIs: An Independent Predictor of Slow Flow/No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Emergent Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
title_fullStr Predilation Ballooning in High Thrombus Laden STEMIs: An Independent Predictor of Slow Flow/No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Emergent Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
title_full_unstemmed Predilation Ballooning in High Thrombus Laden STEMIs: An Independent Predictor of Slow Flow/No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Emergent Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
title_short Predilation Ballooning in High Thrombus Laden STEMIs: An Independent Predictor of Slow Flow/No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Emergent Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
title_sort predilation ballooning in high thrombus laden stemis an independent predictor of slow flow no reflow in patients undergoing emergent percutaneous coronary revascularization
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/4012361
work_keys_str_mv AT rajeshkumar predilationballooninginhighthrombusladenstemisanindependentpredictorofslowflownoreflowinpatientsundergoingemergentpercutaneouscoronaryrevascularization
AT danishqayyum predilationballooninginhighthrombusladenstemisanindependentpredictorofslowflownoreflowinpatientsundergoingemergentpercutaneouscoronaryrevascularization
AT ifikharahmed predilationballooninginhighthrombusladenstemisanindependentpredictorofslowflownoreflowinpatientsundergoingemergentpercutaneouscoronaryrevascularization
AT lajpatrai predilationballooninginhighthrombusladenstemisanindependentpredictorofslowflownoreflowinpatientsundergoingemergentpercutaneouscoronaryrevascularization
AT ayazmir predilationballooninginhighthrombusladenstemisanindependentpredictorofslowflownoreflowinpatientsundergoingemergentpercutaneouscoronaryrevascularization
AT romanaawan predilationballooninginhighthrombusladenstemisanindependentpredictorofslowflownoreflowinpatientsundergoingemergentpercutaneouscoronaryrevascularization
AT alibinnaseer predilationballooninginhighthrombusladenstemisanindependentpredictorofslowflownoreflowinpatientsundergoingemergentpercutaneouscoronaryrevascularization
AT abdulbasit predilationballooninginhighthrombusladenstemisanindependentpredictorofslowflownoreflowinpatientsundergoingemergentpercutaneouscoronaryrevascularization
AT jawaidakbarsial predilationballooninginhighthrombusladenstemisanindependentpredictorofslowflownoreflowinpatientsundergoingemergentpercutaneouscoronaryrevascularization
AT tahirsaghir predilationballooninginhighthrombusladenstemisanindependentpredictorofslowflownoreflowinpatientsundergoingemergentpercutaneouscoronaryrevascularization
AT nadeemqamar predilationballooninginhighthrombusladenstemisanindependentpredictorofslowflownoreflowinpatientsundergoingemergentpercutaneouscoronaryrevascularization
AT musakarim predilationballooninginhighthrombusladenstemisanindependentpredictorofslowflownoreflowinpatientsundergoingemergentpercutaneouscoronaryrevascularization