Baseline Framingham risk score does not predict future ECG-derived QRS duration over an average of 3.3 years

Abstract Background Prolonged electrocardiogram (ECG) QRS duration has been associated with increased cardiovascular risk. It is unclear whether the main predictor of cardiovascular risk, the Framingham risk score also predicts short-term changes in ECG QRS duration. Our aim is to determine whether...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elijah Stone, Yuling Zhou, Herbert Jelinek, Craig S. Mclachlan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-10-01
Series:International Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42444-020-00024-6
_version_ 1830189525647753216
author Elijah Stone
Yuling Zhou
Herbert Jelinek
Craig S. Mclachlan
author_facet Elijah Stone
Yuling Zhou
Herbert Jelinek
Craig S. Mclachlan
author_sort Elijah Stone
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Prolonged electrocardiogram (ECG) QRS duration has been associated with increased cardiovascular risk. It is unclear whether the main predictor of cardiovascular risk, the Framingham risk score also predicts short-term changes in ECG QRS duration. Our aim is to determine whether baseline Framingham risk score is associated with baseline or changes in QRS duration. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed using observational data obtained from two hundred two participants. Framingham risk score was calculated using an online risk calculator. QRS duration was obtained using a 10 s trace from a Welch Allyn PC-based 12-lead ECG system. Results Average follow-up duration was 3.3 ± 1.1 years. Mean QRS change was 1.8 ± 11.4 ms. Specifically, among two hundred two participants, there are 104 subjects with a greater QRS duration at follow-up, while 98 subjects had the same or a shorter follow-up QRS duration. Baseline Framingham risk score did not significantly predict an increase in QRSd with an odds ratio of 1.04 (P = 0.230). Regression analysis of QRS duration at baseline and Framingham risk at baseline had a weak association (R 2 = 0.020; P = 0.043). The Framingham risk score at follow-up was likewise has a weak association with follow-up QRS duration (R 2 = 0.045; P = 0.002). Conclusions Our results do not demonstrate a statistically significant association between Framingham risk parameters and future QRS duration changes over longitudinal time. QRS duration had variable changes between baseline and follow-up. This might suggest that a longer period of follow-up is required to document more stable increases in QRS duration associated with ventricular pathology. A larger population study is needed to confirm our observations.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T23:04:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-84e49f202a58478fa8679ae227593789
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2466-1171
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T23:04:32Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal of Arrhythmia
spelling doaj.art-84e49f202a58478fa8679ae2275937892022-12-21T21:29:19ZengBMCInternational Journal of Arrhythmia2466-11712020-10-012111610.1186/s42444-020-00024-6Baseline Framingham risk score does not predict future ECG-derived QRS duration over an average of 3.3 yearsElijah Stone0Yuling Zhou1Herbert Jelinek2Craig S. Mclachlan3Rural Clinical School, University of New South WalesXiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen UniversityHealth Sciences, Charles Sturt UniversityCentre for Healthy Futures, Health Faculty, Torrens University Australia, Pyrmont Campus, SydneyAbstract Background Prolonged electrocardiogram (ECG) QRS duration has been associated with increased cardiovascular risk. It is unclear whether the main predictor of cardiovascular risk, the Framingham risk score also predicts short-term changes in ECG QRS duration. Our aim is to determine whether baseline Framingham risk score is associated with baseline or changes in QRS duration. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed using observational data obtained from two hundred two participants. Framingham risk score was calculated using an online risk calculator. QRS duration was obtained using a 10 s trace from a Welch Allyn PC-based 12-lead ECG system. Results Average follow-up duration was 3.3 ± 1.1 years. Mean QRS change was 1.8 ± 11.4 ms. Specifically, among two hundred two participants, there are 104 subjects with a greater QRS duration at follow-up, while 98 subjects had the same or a shorter follow-up QRS duration. Baseline Framingham risk score did not significantly predict an increase in QRSd with an odds ratio of 1.04 (P = 0.230). Regression analysis of QRS duration at baseline and Framingham risk at baseline had a weak association (R 2 = 0.020; P = 0.043). The Framingham risk score at follow-up was likewise has a weak association with follow-up QRS duration (R 2 = 0.045; P = 0.002). Conclusions Our results do not demonstrate a statistically significant association between Framingham risk parameters and future QRS duration changes over longitudinal time. QRS duration had variable changes between baseline and follow-up. This might suggest that a longer period of follow-up is required to document more stable increases in QRS duration associated with ventricular pathology. A larger population study is needed to confirm our observations.https://doi.org/10.1186/s42444-020-00024-6ECGQRS durationFramingham risk scorePopulation studyRural
spellingShingle Elijah Stone
Yuling Zhou
Herbert Jelinek
Craig S. Mclachlan
Baseline Framingham risk score does not predict future ECG-derived QRS duration over an average of 3.3 years
International Journal of Arrhythmia
ECG
QRS duration
Framingham risk score
Population study
Rural
title Baseline Framingham risk score does not predict future ECG-derived QRS duration over an average of 3.3 years
title_full Baseline Framingham risk score does not predict future ECG-derived QRS duration over an average of 3.3 years
title_fullStr Baseline Framingham risk score does not predict future ECG-derived QRS duration over an average of 3.3 years
title_full_unstemmed Baseline Framingham risk score does not predict future ECG-derived QRS duration over an average of 3.3 years
title_short Baseline Framingham risk score does not predict future ECG-derived QRS duration over an average of 3.3 years
title_sort baseline framingham risk score does not predict future ecg derived qrs duration over an average of 3 3 years
topic ECG
QRS duration
Framingham risk score
Population study
Rural
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s42444-020-00024-6
work_keys_str_mv AT elijahstone baselineframinghamriskscoredoesnotpredictfutureecgderivedqrsdurationoveranaverageof33years
AT yulingzhou baselineframinghamriskscoredoesnotpredictfutureecgderivedqrsdurationoveranaverageof33years
AT herbertjelinek baselineframinghamriskscoredoesnotpredictfutureecgderivedqrsdurationoveranaverageof33years
AT craigsmclachlan baselineframinghamriskscoredoesnotpredictfutureecgderivedqrsdurationoveranaverageof33years