Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation

Sean McCafferty,1–3 Garrett Lim,2 William Duncan,2 Eniko T Enikov,4 Jim Schwiegerling,1 Jason Levine,1,3 Corin Kew3 1Department of Ophthalmology, College of Optical Science, University of Arizona, 2Intuor Technologies, 3Arizona Eye Consultants, 4Department of Aerospace and Mechanical, Col...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McCafferty S, Lim G, Duncan W, Enikov ET, Schwiegerling J, Levine J, Kew C
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017-05-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/goldmann-tonometer-error-correcting-prism-clinical-evaluation-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
_version_ 1818897799272464384
author McCafferty S
Lim G
Duncan W
Enikov ET
Schwiegerling J
Levine J
Kew C
author_facet McCafferty S
Lim G
Duncan W
Enikov ET
Schwiegerling J
Levine J
Kew C
author_sort McCafferty S
collection DOAJ
description Sean McCafferty,1–3 Garrett Lim,2 William Duncan,2 Eniko T Enikov,4 Jim Schwiegerling,1 Jason Levine,1,3 Corin Kew3 1Department of Ophthalmology, College of Optical Science, University of Arizona, 2Intuor Technologies, 3Arizona Eye Consultants, 4Department of Aerospace and Mechanical, College of Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA Purpose: Clinically evaluate a modified applanating surface Goldmann tonometer prism designed to substantially negate errors due to patient variability in biomechanics.Methods: A modified Goldmann prism with a correcting applanation tonometry surface (CATS) was mathematically optimized to minimize the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement error due to patient variability in corneal thickness, stiffness, curvature, and tear film adhesion force. A comparative clinical study of 109 eyes measured IOP with CATS and Goldmann prisms. The IOP measurement differences between the CATS and Goldmann prisms were correlated to corneal thickness, hysteresis, and curvature.Results: The CATS tonometer prism in correcting for Goldmann central corneal thickness (CCT) error demonstrated a reduction to <±2 mmHg in 97% of a standard CCT population. This compares to only 54% with CCT error <±2 mmHg using the Goldmann prism. Equal reductions of ~50% in errors due to corneal rigidity and curvature were also demonstrated.Conclusion: The results validate the CATS prism’s improved accuracy and expected reduced sensitivity to Goldmann errors without IOP bias as predicted by mathematical modeling. The CATS replacement for the Goldmann prism does not change Goldmann measurement technique or interpretation. Keywords: glaucoma, tonometry, Goldmann, IOP, intraocular pressure, appalnation tonometer, corneal biomechanics, CATS tonometer, CCT, central corneal thickness, tonometer error 
first_indexed 2024-12-19T19:21:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-84eac367305e4194b52b1dd6bd1187bd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1177-5483
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T19:21:55Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Clinical Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-84eac367305e4194b52b1dd6bd1187bd2022-12-21T20:08:58ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832017-05-01Volume 1183584032666Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluationMcCafferty SLim GDuncan WEnikov ETSchwiegerling JLevine JKew CSean McCafferty,1–3 Garrett Lim,2 William Duncan,2 Eniko T Enikov,4 Jim Schwiegerling,1 Jason Levine,1,3 Corin Kew3 1Department of Ophthalmology, College of Optical Science, University of Arizona, 2Intuor Technologies, 3Arizona Eye Consultants, 4Department of Aerospace and Mechanical, College of Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA Purpose: Clinically evaluate a modified applanating surface Goldmann tonometer prism designed to substantially negate errors due to patient variability in biomechanics.Methods: A modified Goldmann prism with a correcting applanation tonometry surface (CATS) was mathematically optimized to minimize the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement error due to patient variability in corneal thickness, stiffness, curvature, and tear film adhesion force. A comparative clinical study of 109 eyes measured IOP with CATS and Goldmann prisms. The IOP measurement differences between the CATS and Goldmann prisms were correlated to corneal thickness, hysteresis, and curvature.Results: The CATS tonometer prism in correcting for Goldmann central corneal thickness (CCT) error demonstrated a reduction to <±2 mmHg in 97% of a standard CCT population. This compares to only 54% with CCT error <±2 mmHg using the Goldmann prism. Equal reductions of ~50% in errors due to corneal rigidity and curvature were also demonstrated.Conclusion: The results validate the CATS prism’s improved accuracy and expected reduced sensitivity to Goldmann errors without IOP bias as predicted by mathematical modeling. The CATS replacement for the Goldmann prism does not change Goldmann measurement technique or interpretation. Keywords: glaucoma, tonometry, Goldmann, IOP, intraocular pressure, appalnation tonometer, corneal biomechanics, CATS tonometer, CCT, central corneal thickness, tonometer error https://www.dovepress.com/goldmann-tonometer-error-correcting-prism-clinical-evaluation-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHGlaucomaintraocular pressuretonometry
spellingShingle McCafferty S
Lim G
Duncan W
Enikov ET
Schwiegerling J
Levine J
Kew C
Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation
Clinical Ophthalmology
Glaucoma
intraocular pressure
tonometry
title Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation
title_full Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation
title_fullStr Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation
title_short Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation
title_sort goldmann tonometer error correcting prism clinical evaluation
topic Glaucoma
intraocular pressure
tonometry
url https://www.dovepress.com/goldmann-tonometer-error-correcting-prism-clinical-evaluation-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
work_keys_str_mv AT mccaffertys goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation
AT limg goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation
AT duncanw goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation
AT enikovet goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation
AT schwiegerlingj goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation
AT levinej goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation
AT kewc goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation