Electric toothbrush application is a reliable and valid test for differentiating temporomandibular disorders pain patients from controls

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Current methods for identifying patients with pain hypersensitivity are sufficiently complex to limit their widespread application in clinical settings. We assessed the reliability and validity of a simple multi-modal vibrotactile st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schiffman Eric L, Look John O, Hemmaty Azar, Nixdorf Donald R, John Mike T
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-07-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/94
_version_ 1819139319455023104
author Schiffman Eric L
Look John O
Hemmaty Azar
Nixdorf Donald R
John Mike T
author_facet Schiffman Eric L
Look John O
Hemmaty Azar
Nixdorf Donald R
John Mike T
author_sort Schiffman Eric L
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Current methods for identifying patients with pain hypersensitivity are sufficiently complex to limit their widespread application in clinical settings. We assessed the reliability and validity of a simple multi-modal vibrotactile stimulus, applied using an electric toothbrush, to evaluate its potential as a screening tool for central sensitization.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fourteen female temporomandibular disorders (TMD) subjects with myofascial pain (RDC/TMD Ia or Ib) and arthralgia (RDC/TMD IIIa) were compared to 13 pain-free controls of matched age and gender. Vibrotactile stimulus was performed with an electric toothbrush, applied with 1 pound pressure for 30 seconds in four locations: over the lateral pole of the temporomandibular joint, masseter, temporalis, and mid-ventral surface of forearm. Pain intensity (0–10) was recorded following the stimulus at 0, 15, 30, and 60 seconds. Test-retest reliability was assessed with measurements from 8 participants, taken 2–12 hours apart. Case versus control differentiation involved comparison of area under the curve (AUC). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine cutoff AUC scores for maximum sensitivity and specificity for this multi-modal vibrotactile stimulus.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Test-retest reliability resulted in an ICC of 0.87 for all 4 pooled sites. ROC-determined AUC cutoff scores resulted in a sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 92% for all 4 pooled sites.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The electric toothbrush stimulus had excellent test-retest reliability. Validity of the scores was demonstrated with modest sensitivity and good specificity for differentiating TMD pain patients from controls, which are acceptable properties for a screening test.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-22T11:20:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-84f160b40aaa408fbaaf2e42926ce9b2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T11:20:46Z
publishDate 2009-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-84f160b40aaa408fbaaf2e42926ce9b22022-12-21T18:27:53ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742009-07-011019410.1186/1471-2474-10-94Electric toothbrush application is a reliable and valid test for differentiating temporomandibular disorders pain patients from controlsSchiffman Eric LLook John OHemmaty AzarNixdorf Donald RJohn Mike T<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Current methods for identifying patients with pain hypersensitivity are sufficiently complex to limit their widespread application in clinical settings. We assessed the reliability and validity of a simple multi-modal vibrotactile stimulus, applied using an electric toothbrush, to evaluate its potential as a screening tool for central sensitization.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fourteen female temporomandibular disorders (TMD) subjects with myofascial pain (RDC/TMD Ia or Ib) and arthralgia (RDC/TMD IIIa) were compared to 13 pain-free controls of matched age and gender. Vibrotactile stimulus was performed with an electric toothbrush, applied with 1 pound pressure for 30 seconds in four locations: over the lateral pole of the temporomandibular joint, masseter, temporalis, and mid-ventral surface of forearm. Pain intensity (0–10) was recorded following the stimulus at 0, 15, 30, and 60 seconds. Test-retest reliability was assessed with measurements from 8 participants, taken 2–12 hours apart. Case versus control differentiation involved comparison of area under the curve (AUC). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine cutoff AUC scores for maximum sensitivity and specificity for this multi-modal vibrotactile stimulus.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Test-retest reliability resulted in an ICC of 0.87 for all 4 pooled sites. ROC-determined AUC cutoff scores resulted in a sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 92% for all 4 pooled sites.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The electric toothbrush stimulus had excellent test-retest reliability. Validity of the scores was demonstrated with modest sensitivity and good specificity for differentiating TMD pain patients from controls, which are acceptable properties for a screening test.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/94
spellingShingle Schiffman Eric L
Look John O
Hemmaty Azar
Nixdorf Donald R
John Mike T
Electric toothbrush application is a reliable and valid test for differentiating temporomandibular disorders pain patients from controls
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
title Electric toothbrush application is a reliable and valid test for differentiating temporomandibular disorders pain patients from controls
title_full Electric toothbrush application is a reliable and valid test for differentiating temporomandibular disorders pain patients from controls
title_fullStr Electric toothbrush application is a reliable and valid test for differentiating temporomandibular disorders pain patients from controls
title_full_unstemmed Electric toothbrush application is a reliable and valid test for differentiating temporomandibular disorders pain patients from controls
title_short Electric toothbrush application is a reliable and valid test for differentiating temporomandibular disorders pain patients from controls
title_sort electric toothbrush application is a reliable and valid test for differentiating temporomandibular disorders pain patients from controls
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/94
work_keys_str_mv AT schiffmanericl electrictoothbrushapplicationisareliableandvalidtestfordifferentiatingtemporomandibulardisorderspainpatientsfromcontrols
AT lookjohno electrictoothbrushapplicationisareliableandvalidtestfordifferentiatingtemporomandibulardisorderspainpatientsfromcontrols
AT hemmatyazar electrictoothbrushapplicationisareliableandvalidtestfordifferentiatingtemporomandibulardisorderspainpatientsfromcontrols
AT nixdorfdonaldr electrictoothbrushapplicationisareliableandvalidtestfordifferentiatingtemporomandibulardisorderspainpatientsfromcontrols
AT johnmiket electrictoothbrushapplicationisareliableandvalidtestfordifferentiatingtemporomandibulardisorderspainpatientsfromcontrols