Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region
A pair of hydro-meteorological modeling systems were calibrated and evaluated for the Ayalon basin in central Israel to assess the advantages and limitations of one-way versus two-way coupled modeling systems for flood prediction. The models used included the Hydrological Engineering Center-Hydrolog...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2016-05-01
|
Series: | Hydrology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2306-5338/3/2/19 |
_version_ | 1828228631018602496 |
---|---|
author | Amir Givati David Gochis Thomas Rummler Harald Kunstmann |
author_facet | Amir Givati David Gochis Thomas Rummler Harald Kunstmann |
author_sort | Amir Givati |
collection | DOAJ |
description | A pair of hydro-meteorological modeling systems were calibrated and evaluated for the Ayalon basin in central Israel to assess the advantages and limitations of one-way versus two-way coupled modeling systems for flood prediction. The models used included the Hydrological Engineering Center-Hydrological Modeling System (HEC-HMS) model and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Hydro modeling system. The models were forced by observed, interpolated precipitation from rain-gauges within the basin, and with modeled precipitation from the WRF atmospheric model. Detailed calibration and evaluation was carried out for two major winter storms in January and December 2013. Then, both modeling systems were executed and evaluated in an operational mode for the full 2014/2015 rainy season. Outputs from these simulations were compared to observed measurements from the hydrometric station at the Ayalon basin outlet. Various statistical metrics were employed to quantify and analyze the results: correlation, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and the Nash–Sutcliffe (NS) efficiency coefficient. Foremost, the results presented in this study highlight the sensitivity of hydrological responses to different sources of simulated and observed precipitation data, and demonstrate improvement, although not significant, at the Hydrological response, like simulated hydrographs. With observed precipitation data both calibrated models closely simulated the observed hydrographs. The two-way coupled WRF/WRF-Hydro modeling system produced improved both the precipitation and hydrological simulations as compared to the one-way WRF simulations. Findings from this study, as well as previous studies, suggest that the use of two-way atmospheric-hydrological coupling has the potential to improve precipitation and, therefore, hydrological forecasts for early flood warning applications. However, more research needed in order to better understand the land-atmosphere coupling mechanisms driving hydrometeorological processes on a wider variety precipitation and terrestrial hydrologic systems. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T18:23:41Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-84f53018d8e44ba08e415f8bdab3dbd4 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2306-5338 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T18:23:41Z |
publishDate | 2016-05-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Hydrology |
spelling | doaj.art-84f53018d8e44ba08e415f8bdab3dbd42022-12-22T03:21:20ZengMDPI AGHydrology2306-53382016-05-01321910.3390/hydrology3020019hydrology3020019Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean RegionAmir Givati0David Gochis1Thomas Rummler2Harald Kunstmann3Israeli Hydrological Service, Water Authority, Jerusalem 91360, IsraelNational Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USADepartment of Geography, University of Augsburg, Augsburg 86135, GermanyKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe 82467, GermanyA pair of hydro-meteorological modeling systems were calibrated and evaluated for the Ayalon basin in central Israel to assess the advantages and limitations of one-way versus two-way coupled modeling systems for flood prediction. The models used included the Hydrological Engineering Center-Hydrological Modeling System (HEC-HMS) model and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Hydro modeling system. The models were forced by observed, interpolated precipitation from rain-gauges within the basin, and with modeled precipitation from the WRF atmospheric model. Detailed calibration and evaluation was carried out for two major winter storms in January and December 2013. Then, both modeling systems were executed and evaluated in an operational mode for the full 2014/2015 rainy season. Outputs from these simulations were compared to observed measurements from the hydrometric station at the Ayalon basin outlet. Various statistical metrics were employed to quantify and analyze the results: correlation, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and the Nash–Sutcliffe (NS) efficiency coefficient. Foremost, the results presented in this study highlight the sensitivity of hydrological responses to different sources of simulated and observed precipitation data, and demonstrate improvement, although not significant, at the Hydrological response, like simulated hydrographs. With observed precipitation data both calibrated models closely simulated the observed hydrographs. The two-way coupled WRF/WRF-Hydro modeling system produced improved both the precipitation and hydrological simulations as compared to the one-way WRF simulations. Findings from this study, as well as previous studies, suggest that the use of two-way atmospheric-hydrological coupling has the potential to improve precipitation and, therefore, hydrological forecasts for early flood warning applications. However, more research needed in order to better understand the land-atmosphere coupling mechanisms driving hydrometeorological processes on a wider variety precipitation and terrestrial hydrologic systems.http://www.mdpi.com/2306-5338/3/2/19floodsatmospheric-land surface couplingWRF-Hydro |
spellingShingle | Amir Givati David Gochis Thomas Rummler Harald Kunstmann Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region Hydrology floods atmospheric-land surface coupling WRF-Hydro |
title | Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region |
title_full | Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region |
title_fullStr | Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region |
title_short | Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region |
title_sort | comparing one way and two way coupled hydrometeorological forecasting systems for flood forecasting in the mediterranean region |
topic | floods atmospheric-land surface coupling WRF-Hydro |
url | http://www.mdpi.com/2306-5338/3/2/19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amirgivati comparingonewayandtwowaycoupledhydrometeorologicalforecastingsystemsforfloodforecastinginthemediterraneanregion AT davidgochis comparingonewayandtwowaycoupledhydrometeorologicalforecastingsystemsforfloodforecastinginthemediterraneanregion AT thomasrummler comparingonewayandtwowaycoupledhydrometeorologicalforecastingsystemsforfloodforecastinginthemediterraneanregion AT haraldkunstmann comparingonewayandtwowaycoupledhydrometeorologicalforecastingsystemsforfloodforecastinginthemediterraneanregion |