Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region

A pair of hydro-meteorological modeling systems were calibrated and evaluated for the Ayalon basin in central Israel to assess the advantages and limitations of one-way versus two-way coupled modeling systems for flood prediction. The models used included the Hydrological Engineering Center-Hydrolog...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amir Givati, David Gochis, Thomas Rummler, Harald Kunstmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-05-01
Series:Hydrology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2306-5338/3/2/19
_version_ 1828228631018602496
author Amir Givati
David Gochis
Thomas Rummler
Harald Kunstmann
author_facet Amir Givati
David Gochis
Thomas Rummler
Harald Kunstmann
author_sort Amir Givati
collection DOAJ
description A pair of hydro-meteorological modeling systems were calibrated and evaluated for the Ayalon basin in central Israel to assess the advantages and limitations of one-way versus two-way coupled modeling systems for flood prediction. The models used included the Hydrological Engineering Center-Hydrological Modeling System (HEC-HMS) model and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Hydro modeling system. The models were forced by observed, interpolated precipitation from rain-gauges within the basin, and with modeled precipitation from the WRF atmospheric model. Detailed calibration and evaluation was carried out for two major winter storms in January and December 2013. Then, both modeling systems were executed and evaluated in an operational mode for the full 2014/2015 rainy season. Outputs from these simulations were compared to observed measurements from the hydrometric station at the Ayalon basin outlet. Various statistical metrics were employed to quantify and analyze the results: correlation, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and the Nash–Sutcliffe (NS) efficiency coefficient. Foremost, the results presented in this study highlight the sensitivity of hydrological responses to different sources of simulated and observed precipitation data, and demonstrate improvement, although not significant, at the Hydrological response, like simulated hydrographs. With observed precipitation data both calibrated models closely simulated the observed hydrographs. The two-way coupled WRF/WRF-Hydro modeling system produced improved both the precipitation and hydrological simulations as compared to the one-way WRF simulations. Findings from this study, as well as previous studies, suggest that the use of two-way atmospheric-hydrological coupling has the potential to improve precipitation and, therefore, hydrological forecasts for early flood warning applications. However, more research needed in order to better understand the land-atmosphere coupling mechanisms driving hydrometeorological processes on a wider variety precipitation and terrestrial hydrologic systems.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T18:23:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-84f53018d8e44ba08e415f8bdab3dbd4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2306-5338
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T18:23:41Z
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Hydrology
spelling doaj.art-84f53018d8e44ba08e415f8bdab3dbd42022-12-22T03:21:20ZengMDPI AGHydrology2306-53382016-05-01321910.3390/hydrology3020019hydrology3020019Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean RegionAmir Givati0David Gochis1Thomas Rummler2Harald Kunstmann3Israeli Hydrological Service, Water Authority, Jerusalem 91360, IsraelNational Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USADepartment of Geography, University of Augsburg, Augsburg 86135, GermanyKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe 82467, GermanyA pair of hydro-meteorological modeling systems were calibrated and evaluated for the Ayalon basin in central Israel to assess the advantages and limitations of one-way versus two-way coupled modeling systems for flood prediction. The models used included the Hydrological Engineering Center-Hydrological Modeling System (HEC-HMS) model and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Hydro modeling system. The models were forced by observed, interpolated precipitation from rain-gauges within the basin, and with modeled precipitation from the WRF atmospheric model. Detailed calibration and evaluation was carried out for two major winter storms in January and December 2013. Then, both modeling systems were executed and evaluated in an operational mode for the full 2014/2015 rainy season. Outputs from these simulations were compared to observed measurements from the hydrometric station at the Ayalon basin outlet. Various statistical metrics were employed to quantify and analyze the results: correlation, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and the Nash–Sutcliffe (NS) efficiency coefficient. Foremost, the results presented in this study highlight the sensitivity of hydrological responses to different sources of simulated and observed precipitation data, and demonstrate improvement, although not significant, at the Hydrological response, like simulated hydrographs. With observed precipitation data both calibrated models closely simulated the observed hydrographs. The two-way coupled WRF/WRF-Hydro modeling system produced improved both the precipitation and hydrological simulations as compared to the one-way WRF simulations. Findings from this study, as well as previous studies, suggest that the use of two-way atmospheric-hydrological coupling has the potential to improve precipitation and, therefore, hydrological forecasts for early flood warning applications. However, more research needed in order to better understand the land-atmosphere coupling mechanisms driving hydrometeorological processes on a wider variety precipitation and terrestrial hydrologic systems.http://www.mdpi.com/2306-5338/3/2/19floodsatmospheric-land surface couplingWRF-Hydro
spellingShingle Amir Givati
David Gochis
Thomas Rummler
Harald Kunstmann
Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region
Hydrology
floods
atmospheric-land surface coupling
WRF-Hydro
title Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region
title_full Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region
title_fullStr Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region
title_full_unstemmed Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region
title_short Comparing One-Way and Two-Way Coupled Hydrometeorological Forecasting Systems for Flood Forecasting in the Mediterranean Region
title_sort comparing one way and two way coupled hydrometeorological forecasting systems for flood forecasting in the mediterranean region
topic floods
atmospheric-land surface coupling
WRF-Hydro
url http://www.mdpi.com/2306-5338/3/2/19
work_keys_str_mv AT amirgivati comparingonewayandtwowaycoupledhydrometeorologicalforecastingsystemsforfloodforecastinginthemediterraneanregion
AT davidgochis comparingonewayandtwowaycoupledhydrometeorologicalforecastingsystemsforfloodforecastinginthemediterraneanregion
AT thomasrummler comparingonewayandtwowaycoupledhydrometeorologicalforecastingsystemsforfloodforecastinginthemediterraneanregion
AT haraldkunstmann comparingonewayandtwowaycoupledhydrometeorologicalforecastingsystemsforfloodforecastinginthemediterraneanregion