Efficacy of liquid-based cytology versus conventional smears in FNA samples

Background: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is fast becoming a useful method in evaluating both gynecological and non-gynecological preparations, including fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. Even distribution of cells, decreasing obscuring background elements like blood and mucus, well preserved nuc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kalpalata Tripathy, Aparajita Misra, Joydip Kumar Ghosh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Cytology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2015;volume=32;issue=1;spage=17;epage=20;aulast=Tripathy
_version_ 1818590488653987840
author Kalpalata Tripathy
Aparajita Misra
Joydip Kumar Ghosh
author_facet Kalpalata Tripathy
Aparajita Misra
Joydip Kumar Ghosh
author_sort Kalpalata Tripathy
collection DOAJ
description Background: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is fast becoming a useful method in evaluating both gynecological and non-gynecological preparations, including fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. Even distribution of cells, decreasing obscuring background elements like blood and mucus, well preserved nuclear and cytoplasmic details and rapid fixation helps in better visualization of cells. Aim: This study was conducted to asses the diagnostic accuracy of liquid-based cytology versus conventional smears in fine needle aspiration samples. Study Design: In this prospective study, we had 110 cases, including 30 cases of breast, 40 of lymph node, 10 of salivary glands, 18 of thyroid and 12 of bone and soft tissue. In each case, two passes were performed. The first pass was for conventional preparation (CP) and the second pass yielded material for thin-prep (TP) preparation. Both CP and TP smears were compared for cellularity, background blood and necrotic cell debris, cell architecture, informative background, presence of a monolayer of cells and nuclear and cytoplasmic details by a semiquantitative scoring system. Wilcoxon′s signed rank test on an SPSS program was used for statistical analysis. Results: Diagnostic accuracy was better in LBC smears compared with CP smears due to lack of background debris and better cell morphology, which was performed according to Wilcoxon′s signed rank test, yielding a P-value of <0.001. However, in some cases, because of a decrease in cell size, clustering and altered background in LBC, a support of CP was essential. Conclusion: LBC performed on FNA samples can be a simple and valuable technique. Only in few selected cases, where background factor is an essential diagnostic clue, a combination of both CP and TP is necessary.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T09:57:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8507a3cbefca479c86d4b0cb6a36f836
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-9371
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T09:57:21Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Cytology
spelling doaj.art-8507a3cbefca479c86d4b0cb6a36f8362022-12-21T22:35:53ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Cytology0970-93712015-01-01321172010.4103/0970-9371.155225Efficacy of liquid-based cytology versus conventional smears in FNA samplesKalpalata TripathyAparajita MisraJoydip Kumar GhoshBackground: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is fast becoming a useful method in evaluating both gynecological and non-gynecological preparations, including fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. Even distribution of cells, decreasing obscuring background elements like blood and mucus, well preserved nuclear and cytoplasmic details and rapid fixation helps in better visualization of cells. Aim: This study was conducted to asses the diagnostic accuracy of liquid-based cytology versus conventional smears in fine needle aspiration samples. Study Design: In this prospective study, we had 110 cases, including 30 cases of breast, 40 of lymph node, 10 of salivary glands, 18 of thyroid and 12 of bone and soft tissue. In each case, two passes were performed. The first pass was for conventional preparation (CP) and the second pass yielded material for thin-prep (TP) preparation. Both CP and TP smears were compared for cellularity, background blood and necrotic cell debris, cell architecture, informative background, presence of a monolayer of cells and nuclear and cytoplasmic details by a semiquantitative scoring system. Wilcoxon′s signed rank test on an SPSS program was used for statistical analysis. Results: Diagnostic accuracy was better in LBC smears compared with CP smears due to lack of background debris and better cell morphology, which was performed according to Wilcoxon′s signed rank test, yielding a P-value of <0.001. However, in some cases, because of a decrease in cell size, clustering and altered background in LBC, a support of CP was essential. Conclusion: LBC performed on FNA samples can be a simple and valuable technique. Only in few selected cases, where background factor is an essential diagnostic clue, a combination of both CP and TP is necessary.http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2015;volume=32;issue=1;spage=17;epage=20;aulast=TripathyConventional preparations (CP); liquid-based cytology (LBC); thin prep (TP)
spellingShingle Kalpalata Tripathy
Aparajita Misra
Joydip Kumar Ghosh
Efficacy of liquid-based cytology versus conventional smears in FNA samples
Journal of Cytology
Conventional preparations (CP); liquid-based cytology (LBC); thin prep (TP)
title Efficacy of liquid-based cytology versus conventional smears in FNA samples
title_full Efficacy of liquid-based cytology versus conventional smears in FNA samples
title_fullStr Efficacy of liquid-based cytology versus conventional smears in FNA samples
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of liquid-based cytology versus conventional smears in FNA samples
title_short Efficacy of liquid-based cytology versus conventional smears in FNA samples
title_sort efficacy of liquid based cytology versus conventional smears in fna samples
topic Conventional preparations (CP); liquid-based cytology (LBC); thin prep (TP)
url http://www.jcytol.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9371;year=2015;volume=32;issue=1;spage=17;epage=20;aulast=Tripathy
work_keys_str_mv AT kalpalatatripathy efficacyofliquidbasedcytologyversusconventionalsmearsinfnasamples
AT aparajitamisra efficacyofliquidbasedcytologyversusconventionalsmearsinfnasamples
AT joydipkumarghosh efficacyofliquidbasedcytologyversusconventionalsmearsinfnasamples