Evaluation of deep topical fornix block versus topical anesthesia in patients undergoing implantable collamer lens procedure

Background and aim: Local anesthesia nowadays became more popular in the ophthalmic surgery, especially in implantable collamer lens (ICL) procedure, with fewer complications and more patient satisfaction. Here we design a study to evaluate deep topical fornix nerve block (DTFNBA) versus topical ane...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sherif Eissa, Hassan Mohamed Ali, Hany Maher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-07-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184916300228
_version_ 1819103342258814976
author Sherif Eissa
Hassan Mohamed Ali
Hany Maher
author_facet Sherif Eissa
Hassan Mohamed Ali
Hany Maher
author_sort Sherif Eissa
collection DOAJ
description Background and aim: Local anesthesia nowadays became more popular in the ophthalmic surgery, especially in implantable collamer lens (ICL) procedure, with fewer complications and more patient satisfaction. Here we design a study to evaluate deep topical fornix nerve block (DTFNBA) versus topical anesthesia. Methods: A double blinded randomized prospective controlled study of 107 eyes that were scheduled for implantable collamer lens procedure was included and divided randomly into two groups, group I topical anesthesia (n = 53), group II DTFNBA (n = 54). The two groups were monitored for pain and patient compliance. Results: In group I, receiving topical anesthesia 27 patients (50.09%) reported pain, especially with implantation of the lens, tucking of the lens footplates and peripheral iridectomy that necessitated intracameral lidocaine injection. The others (n = 26) showed different grades of discomfort that was tolerated without the need for intracameral lidocaine. 40 patients (74.07%) in group II (DTFNBA), tolerated the surgery well, and slight discomfort was reported as a sensation of heaviness during the tucking of footplates. None of the patients had pain strong enough to require intracameral injection of lidocaine (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Placing the anesthetic in the fornix makes the DTFNBA more effective and reliable block.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T01:48:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8509174a8d154c10ac9f0b90f9b0301e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1110-1849
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T01:48:56Z
publishDate 2016-07-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj.art-8509174a8d154c10ac9f0b90f9b0301e2022-12-21T18:42:58ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEgyptian Journal of Anaesthesia1110-18492016-07-0132340340710.1016/j.egja.2016.03.005Evaluation of deep topical fornix block versus topical anesthesia in patients undergoing implantable collamer lens procedureSherif Eissa0Hassan Mohamed Ali1Hany Maher2Ophthalmology Department, Cairo University, Cairo, EgyptAnesthesia Department, Cairo University, EgyptAnesthesia Department, Ain Shams University, EgyptBackground and aim: Local anesthesia nowadays became more popular in the ophthalmic surgery, especially in implantable collamer lens (ICL) procedure, with fewer complications and more patient satisfaction. Here we design a study to evaluate deep topical fornix nerve block (DTFNBA) versus topical anesthesia. Methods: A double blinded randomized prospective controlled study of 107 eyes that were scheduled for implantable collamer lens procedure was included and divided randomly into two groups, group I topical anesthesia (n = 53), group II DTFNBA (n = 54). The two groups were monitored for pain and patient compliance. Results: In group I, receiving topical anesthesia 27 patients (50.09%) reported pain, especially with implantation of the lens, tucking of the lens footplates and peripheral iridectomy that necessitated intracameral lidocaine injection. The others (n = 26) showed different grades of discomfort that was tolerated without the need for intracameral lidocaine. 40 patients (74.07%) in group II (DTFNBA), tolerated the surgery well, and slight discomfort was reported as a sensation of heaviness during the tucking of footplates. None of the patients had pain strong enough to require intracameral injection of lidocaine (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Placing the anesthetic in the fornix makes the DTFNBA more effective and reliable block.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184916300228DTFNBA-topical anesthesia-ICL
spellingShingle Sherif Eissa
Hassan Mohamed Ali
Hany Maher
Evaluation of deep topical fornix block versus topical anesthesia in patients undergoing implantable collamer lens procedure
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
DTFNBA-topical anesthesia-ICL
title Evaluation of deep topical fornix block versus topical anesthesia in patients undergoing implantable collamer lens procedure
title_full Evaluation of deep topical fornix block versus topical anesthesia in patients undergoing implantable collamer lens procedure
title_fullStr Evaluation of deep topical fornix block versus topical anesthesia in patients undergoing implantable collamer lens procedure
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of deep topical fornix block versus topical anesthesia in patients undergoing implantable collamer lens procedure
title_short Evaluation of deep topical fornix block versus topical anesthesia in patients undergoing implantable collamer lens procedure
title_sort evaluation of deep topical fornix block versus topical anesthesia in patients undergoing implantable collamer lens procedure
topic DTFNBA-topical anesthesia-ICL
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184916300228
work_keys_str_mv AT sherifeissa evaluationofdeeptopicalfornixblockversustopicalanesthesiainpatientsundergoingimplantablecollamerlensprocedure
AT hassanmohamedali evaluationofdeeptopicalfornixblockversustopicalanesthesiainpatientsundergoingimplantablecollamerlensprocedure
AT hanymaher evaluationofdeeptopicalfornixblockversustopicalanesthesiainpatientsundergoingimplantablecollamerlensprocedure