Evaluation of the Success Rate of Anterior Narrow Diameter Single-Unit Implant (2.4 mm and 3 mm) after One Year of Loading

Introduction and Objectives: Nowadays, it is essential to use narrow diameter implants in reduced bone thickness. Due to controversies in previous research, the present study was conducted to evaluate the success rate of narrow diameter implants (2.4 mm and 3 mm) in a single tooth in the anterior re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohsen Rezaei, Ezatollah Jalalian, Saeed Sadat Mansouri, Morteza Neshandar, mahsa maghsoudlou nejad, Amin Zandian
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Mashhad Dental School
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jmds.mums.ac.ir/article_21408_517dad6f2112b8a1dba837f6627b18d6.pdf
_version_ 1797978023977287680
author Mohsen Rezaei
Ezatollah Jalalian
Saeed Sadat Mansouri
Morteza Neshandar
mahsa maghsoudlou nejad
Amin Zandian
author_facet Mohsen Rezaei
Ezatollah Jalalian
Saeed Sadat Mansouri
Morteza Neshandar
mahsa maghsoudlou nejad
Amin Zandian
author_sort Mohsen Rezaei
collection DOAJ
description Introduction and Objectives: Nowadays, it is essential to use narrow diameter implants in reduced bone thickness. Due to controversies in previous research, the present study was conducted to evaluate the success rate of narrow diameter implants (2.4 mm and 3 mm) in a single tooth in the anterior region after one year of loading.Materials and Methods: In this historical cohort study, groups under investigation included patients who received single-tooth implants in the anterior edentulous segment without bone graft [40 patients with implants 2.4 mm in diameter (IMTEC, USA) and 3 mm in diameter (MILO, USA), n=20]. During the follow-up period of one year, bone resorption, pain, numbness, mobility, esthetic, peri-implant radiolucency, probing depth, and gingival index were evaluated. The Fisher’s exact test and T-test were used to analyze aesthetic scores while the Mann-Whitney test and the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test were employed to compare gingival index values.Results: In this research, no discernible bone resorption, peri-implant radiolucency, pain, and numbness was found, and only in five implants, prostheses lacked esthetic, according to pink esthetic scores. The total survival rate and success rates were 100% and 98.3% respectively.Conclusion: Within the limitationS of this study, narrow diameter implants replacing the anterior teeth (for proper case selection and ideal occlusion) is a successful treatment plan with a high survival and success rate.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:16:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-85198d84e4664be99022d69d47ac47df
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1560-9286
2008-2347
language fas
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:16:23Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Mashhad Dental School
spelling doaj.art-85198d84e4664be99022d69d47ac47df2022-12-24T10:16:47ZfasMashhad University of Medical SciencesJournal of Mashhad Dental School1560-92862008-23472022-12-0146436137110.22038/jmds.2022.59877.208221408Evaluation of the Success Rate of Anterior Narrow Diameter Single-Unit Implant (2.4 mm and 3 mm) after One Year of LoadingMohsen Rezaei0Ezatollah Jalalian1Saeed Sadat Mansouri2Morteza Neshandar3mahsa maghsoudlou nejad4Amin Zandian5Assistant professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranAssociate Professor, Department of Prostodontics, Dental Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IranAssociate Professor, Department of Periodontics, Dental Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IranDentist, Private Practice, Tehran, IranPostgraduate student, Restorative Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranPostgraduate student, Restorative Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranIntroduction and Objectives: Nowadays, it is essential to use narrow diameter implants in reduced bone thickness. Due to controversies in previous research, the present study was conducted to evaluate the success rate of narrow diameter implants (2.4 mm and 3 mm) in a single tooth in the anterior region after one year of loading.Materials and Methods: In this historical cohort study, groups under investigation included patients who received single-tooth implants in the anterior edentulous segment without bone graft [40 patients with implants 2.4 mm in diameter (IMTEC, USA) and 3 mm in diameter (MILO, USA), n=20]. During the follow-up period of one year, bone resorption, pain, numbness, mobility, esthetic, peri-implant radiolucency, probing depth, and gingival index were evaluated. The Fisher’s exact test and T-test were used to analyze aesthetic scores while the Mann-Whitney test and the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test were employed to compare gingival index values.Results: In this research, no discernible bone resorption, peri-implant radiolucency, pain, and numbness was found, and only in five implants, prostheses lacked esthetic, according to pink esthetic scores. The total survival rate and success rates were 100% and 98.3% respectively.Conclusion: Within the limitationS of this study, narrow diameter implants replacing the anterior teeth (for proper case selection and ideal occlusion) is a successful treatment plan with a high survival and success rate.https://jmds.mums.ac.ir/article_21408_517dad6f2112b8a1dba837f6627b18d6.pdfanterior segmentnarrow implantsingle tooth
spellingShingle Mohsen Rezaei
Ezatollah Jalalian
Saeed Sadat Mansouri
Morteza Neshandar
mahsa maghsoudlou nejad
Amin Zandian
Evaluation of the Success Rate of Anterior Narrow Diameter Single-Unit Implant (2.4 mm and 3 mm) after One Year of Loading
Journal of Mashhad Dental School
anterior segment
narrow implant
single tooth
title Evaluation of the Success Rate of Anterior Narrow Diameter Single-Unit Implant (2.4 mm and 3 mm) after One Year of Loading
title_full Evaluation of the Success Rate of Anterior Narrow Diameter Single-Unit Implant (2.4 mm and 3 mm) after One Year of Loading
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Success Rate of Anterior Narrow Diameter Single-Unit Implant (2.4 mm and 3 mm) after One Year of Loading
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Success Rate of Anterior Narrow Diameter Single-Unit Implant (2.4 mm and 3 mm) after One Year of Loading
title_short Evaluation of the Success Rate of Anterior Narrow Diameter Single-Unit Implant (2.4 mm and 3 mm) after One Year of Loading
title_sort evaluation of the success rate of anterior narrow diameter single unit implant 2 4 mm and 3 mm after one year of loading
topic anterior segment
narrow implant
single tooth
url https://jmds.mums.ac.ir/article_21408_517dad6f2112b8a1dba837f6627b18d6.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohsenrezaei evaluationofthesuccessrateofanteriornarrowdiametersingleunitimplant24mmand3mmafteroneyearofloading
AT ezatollahjalalian evaluationofthesuccessrateofanteriornarrowdiametersingleunitimplant24mmand3mmafteroneyearofloading
AT saeedsadatmansouri evaluationofthesuccessrateofanteriornarrowdiametersingleunitimplant24mmand3mmafteroneyearofloading
AT mortezaneshandar evaluationofthesuccessrateofanteriornarrowdiametersingleunitimplant24mmand3mmafteroneyearofloading
AT mahsamaghsoudlounejad evaluationofthesuccessrateofanteriornarrowdiametersingleunitimplant24mmand3mmafteroneyearofloading
AT aminzandian evaluationofthesuccessrateofanteriornarrowdiametersingleunitimplant24mmand3mmafteroneyearofloading