The Discourse of The Qur'anic Metaphors: The Embryo of Theological Sects Disputes in Comprehending the Holy Qur'an

This article aims to examine problems related to metaphors (majāz) found in the Qur’an which were debated by scholars of Arabic literatures during the classic times. Majāz, opposed to ḥaqīqah, is a part of the Qur'an language styles which triggers theological debates among its supporters. This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmad Atabik
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta 2021-07-01
Series:Esensia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/ushuluddin/esensia/article/view/2705
_version_ 1797996426827923456
author Ahmad Atabik
author_facet Ahmad Atabik
author_sort Ahmad Atabik
collection DOAJ
description This article aims to examine problems related to metaphors (majāz) found in the Qur’an which were debated by scholars of Arabic literatures during the classic times. Majāz, opposed to ḥaqīqah, is a part of the Qur'an language styles which triggers theological debates among its supporters. This article used a qualitative approach, through library research, with a comprehensive and comparative analysis method among supporters of theological sects in understanding the problems of majāz in the Qur'an. The results of this study indicated that the debates on the issue raises three opinions in theological sects; Firstly, the Ẓahirī and Salafi sects reject the existence of majāz in the Qur'an. They refuse the interpretations of things that are not standardized in the text of the Qur'an. Secondly, the Mu'tazilah sect is exaggerated in accepting majāz and attacking other theological sects that are inconsistent with their interpretations of the text. Thirdly, the Ash’arī sect which is more moderate in confirming majāz. The starting point of their debates over majāz in the Qur'an is the difference in analysis and conclusions about the origin of language. The Ẓahirī and Salafi groups conclude that language is solely a gift from God, so there should be no change in terms of meaning. The Mu'tazilah believes that language is an invention and human power, that’s why a word may have more than one meaning. Whilst, the Ash’arī argues that language is indeed a human creativity, but it cannot be denied that God also plays a role in giving human abilities, so there are other possible meanings of a word
first_indexed 2024-04-11T10:17:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-85242cd4d40947e4a1989b6fec202da3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1411-3775
2548-4729
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-04-11T10:17:20Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
record_format Article
series Esensia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin
spelling doaj.art-85242cd4d40947e4a1989b6fec202da32022-12-22T04:29:54ZaraUIN Sunan Kalijaga YogyakartaEsensia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin1411-37752548-47292021-07-0122110.14421/esensia.v22i1.2705The Discourse of The Qur'anic Metaphors: The Embryo of Theological Sects Disputes in Comprehending the Holy Qur'anAhmad Atabik0IAIN KudusThis article aims to examine problems related to metaphors (majāz) found in the Qur’an which were debated by scholars of Arabic literatures during the classic times. Majāz, opposed to ḥaqīqah, is a part of the Qur'an language styles which triggers theological debates among its supporters. This article used a qualitative approach, through library research, with a comprehensive and comparative analysis method among supporters of theological sects in understanding the problems of majāz in the Qur'an. The results of this study indicated that the debates on the issue raises three opinions in theological sects; Firstly, the Ẓahirī and Salafi sects reject the existence of majāz in the Qur'an. They refuse the interpretations of things that are not standardized in the text of the Qur'an. Secondly, the Mu'tazilah sect is exaggerated in accepting majāz and attacking other theological sects that are inconsistent with their interpretations of the text. Thirdly, the Ash’arī sect which is more moderate in confirming majāz. The starting point of their debates over majāz in the Qur'an is the difference in analysis and conclusions about the origin of language. The Ẓahirī and Salafi groups conclude that language is solely a gift from God, so there should be no change in terms of meaning. The Mu'tazilah believes that language is an invention and human power, that’s why a word may have more than one meaning. Whilst, the Ash’arī argues that language is indeed a human creativity, but it cannot be denied that God also plays a role in giving human abilities, so there are other possible meanings of a wordhttps://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/ushuluddin/esensia/article/view/2705The Qur'anic MetaphorsTheological SectsClassical Period
spellingShingle Ahmad Atabik
The Discourse of The Qur'anic Metaphors: The Embryo of Theological Sects Disputes in Comprehending the Holy Qur'an
Esensia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin
The Qur'anic Metaphors
Theological Sects
Classical Period
title The Discourse of The Qur'anic Metaphors: The Embryo of Theological Sects Disputes in Comprehending the Holy Qur'an
title_full The Discourse of The Qur'anic Metaphors: The Embryo of Theological Sects Disputes in Comprehending the Holy Qur'an
title_fullStr The Discourse of The Qur'anic Metaphors: The Embryo of Theological Sects Disputes in Comprehending the Holy Qur'an
title_full_unstemmed The Discourse of The Qur'anic Metaphors: The Embryo of Theological Sects Disputes in Comprehending the Holy Qur'an
title_short The Discourse of The Qur'anic Metaphors: The Embryo of Theological Sects Disputes in Comprehending the Holy Qur'an
title_sort discourse of the qur anic metaphors the embryo of theological sects disputes in comprehending the holy qur an
topic The Qur'anic Metaphors
Theological Sects
Classical Period
url https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/ushuluddin/esensia/article/view/2705
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadatabik thediscourseofthequranicmetaphorstheembryooftheologicalsectsdisputesincomprehendingtheholyquran
AT ahmadatabik discourseofthequranicmetaphorstheembryooftheologicalsectsdisputesincomprehendingtheholyquran