A Case Against the Policy Mandating Vertically-Aligned Degrees in Philippine Graduate Education
This paper delves into a policy that mandates vertically-aligned degrees. For context, many universities have adopted and are increasingly considering adopting this rule, which surprisingly has not faced much public criticism. This paper argues against the policy of mandating vertically-aligned degr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ural Federal University
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Changing Societies & Personalities |
| Online Access: | https://changing-sp.com/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/488 |
| _version_ | 1797294410175610880 |
|---|---|
| author | Louie Giray |
| author_facet | Louie Giray |
| author_sort | Louie Giray |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper delves into a policy that mandates vertically-aligned degrees. For context, many universities have adopted and are increasingly considering adopting this rule, which surprisingly has not faced much public criticism. This paper argues against the policy of mandating vertically-aligned degrees because it is, in the term of Frankfurt, bullshit and lacks merit due to administrators’ misconceptions about vertical alignment. It asserts that the policy mandating vertically-aligned degrees restricts academic freedom and presents students with a false dilemma, limiting opportunities for generalism and multipotentiality. Upon examination, the policy leads to the dehumanization and alienation of students, reshaping universities into undemocratic, tyrannical entities while stifling creativity and cross-disciplinary collaboration. This paper advocates for a more adaptable and inclusive graduate education framework. It underscores the necessity of prioritizing students’ individual needs and aspirations, urging for an environment where students have the agency to mold their educational journey. This paper strongly urges a shift away from inflexible educational mandates and highlights the significance of fostering an environment that champions autonomy, welcomes diverse academic pursuits, and enables the full exploration of students’ potential. Finally, it seeks to cultivate an educational landscape that fosters innovation and societal progress while honoring individual autonomy and development. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T21:29:51Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-85255cda643d4c3ebee318296f021391 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2587-6104 2587-8964 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T21:29:51Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Ural Federal University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Changing Societies & Personalities |
| spelling | doaj.art-85255cda643d4c3ebee318296f0213912024-02-26T17:47:00ZengUral Federal UniversityChanging Societies & Personalities2587-61042587-89642023-12-0174113010.15826/csp.2023.7.4.249488A Case Against the Policy Mandating Vertically-Aligned Degrees in Philippine Graduate EducationLouie Giray0Colegio de Muntinlupa, PhilippinesThis paper delves into a policy that mandates vertically-aligned degrees. For context, many universities have adopted and are increasingly considering adopting this rule, which surprisingly has not faced much public criticism. This paper argues against the policy of mandating vertically-aligned degrees because it is, in the term of Frankfurt, bullshit and lacks merit due to administrators’ misconceptions about vertical alignment. It asserts that the policy mandating vertically-aligned degrees restricts academic freedom and presents students with a false dilemma, limiting opportunities for generalism and multipotentiality. Upon examination, the policy leads to the dehumanization and alienation of students, reshaping universities into undemocratic, tyrannical entities while stifling creativity and cross-disciplinary collaboration. This paper advocates for a more adaptable and inclusive graduate education framework. It underscores the necessity of prioritizing students’ individual needs and aspirations, urging for an environment where students have the agency to mold their educational journey. This paper strongly urges a shift away from inflexible educational mandates and highlights the significance of fostering an environment that champions autonomy, welcomes diverse academic pursuits, and enables the full exploration of students’ potential. Finally, it seeks to cultivate an educational landscape that fosters innovation and societal progress while honoring individual autonomy and development.https://changing-sp.com/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/488 |
| spellingShingle | Louie Giray A Case Against the Policy Mandating Vertically-Aligned Degrees in Philippine Graduate Education Changing Societies & Personalities |
| title | A Case Against the Policy Mandating Vertically-Aligned Degrees in Philippine Graduate Education |
| title_full | A Case Against the Policy Mandating Vertically-Aligned Degrees in Philippine Graduate Education |
| title_fullStr | A Case Against the Policy Mandating Vertically-Aligned Degrees in Philippine Graduate Education |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Case Against the Policy Mandating Vertically-Aligned Degrees in Philippine Graduate Education |
| title_short | A Case Against the Policy Mandating Vertically-Aligned Degrees in Philippine Graduate Education |
| title_sort | case against the policy mandating vertically aligned degrees in philippine graduate education |
| url | https://changing-sp.com/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/488 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT louiegiray acaseagainstthepolicymandatingverticallyaligneddegreesinphilippinegraduateeducation AT louiegiray caseagainstthepolicymandatingverticallyaligneddegreesinphilippinegraduateeducation |