The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain

Abstract Background Modic changes (MC) are associated with low back pain (LBP). In this study, we compared changes in size and type of MC, after a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg zoledronic acid (ZA) or placebo, among chronic LBP patients with MC on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and evaluate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katri Koivisto, Jyri Järvinen, Jaro Karppinen, Marianne Haapea, Markus Paananen, Eero Kyllönen, Osmo Tervonen, Jaakko Niinimäki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-06-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-017-1632-z
_version_ 1811327313794564096
author Katri Koivisto
Jyri Järvinen
Jaro Karppinen
Marianne Haapea
Markus Paananen
Eero Kyllönen
Osmo Tervonen
Jaakko Niinimäki
author_facet Katri Koivisto
Jyri Järvinen
Jaro Karppinen
Marianne Haapea
Markus Paananen
Eero Kyllönen
Osmo Tervonen
Jaakko Niinimäki
author_sort Katri Koivisto
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Modic changes (MC) are associated with low back pain (LBP). In this study, we compared changes in size and type of MC, after a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg zoledronic acid (ZA) or placebo, among chronic LBP patients with MC on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and evaluated whether the MRI changes correlate with symptoms. Methods All patients (N = 19 in ZA, 20 in placebo) had MRI at baseline (0.23–1.5 T) and at one year (1.5-3 T). We evaluated the level, type and volume of all the MC. The MC were classified into M1 (M1 (100%)), predominating M1 (M1/2 (65:35%)) or predominating M2 (M1/2 (35:65%)), and M2 (M2 (100%)). The first two were considered M1-dominant, and the latter two M2-dominant. Volumes of M1 and M2 were calculated separately for the primary MC, which was assumed to cause the symptoms, and the other MC. We analysed the one-year treatment differences in M1 and M2 volumes using analysis of covariance with adjustments for age, sex, body mass index, and smoking. The correlations between the MRI changes and the changes in LBP symptoms were analysed using Pearson correlations. Results In the ZA group, 84.2% of patients had M1-dominant primary MC at baseline, compared to 50% in the placebo group (p = 0.041). The primary MC in the ZA group converted more likely to M2-dominant (42.1% ZA, 15% placebo; p = 0.0119). The other MC (15 ZA, 8 placebo) were on average 42% smaller and remained largely M2-dominant. The M1 volume of the primary MC decreased in the ZA group, but increased in the placebo group (−0.83 cm3 vs 0.91 cm3; p = 0.21). The adjusted treatment difference for M1 volume was −1.9 cm3 (95% CI -5.0 to 1.2; p = 0.22) and for M2 volume 0.23 cm3 (p = 0.86). In the MC that remained M1-dominant, volume change correlated positively with increased symptoms in the placebo group, whereas the correlations were negative and weak in the ZA group. Conclusions Zoledronic acid tended to speed up the conversion of M1-dominant into M2-dominant MC and decrease the volume of M1-dominant MC, although statistical significance was not demonstrated. Trial registration The registration number in ClinicalTrials.gov is NCT01330238 and the date of registration February 11, 2011.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T15:04:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-852c0f7b24074b1c9397bf80a8b96e8e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T15:04:26Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-852c0f7b24074b1c9397bf80a8b96e8e2022-12-22T02:42:12ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742017-06-0118111010.1186/s12891-017-1632-zThe effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back painKatri Koivisto0Jyri Järvinen1Jaro Karppinen2Marianne Haapea3Markus Paananen4Eero Kyllönen5Osmo Tervonen6Jaakko Niinimäki7Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of OuluInstitute of Diagnostics, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University HospitalMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of OuluMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of OuluMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of OuluMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of OuluInstitute of Diagnostics, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University HospitalInstitute of Diagnostics, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University HospitalAbstract Background Modic changes (MC) are associated with low back pain (LBP). In this study, we compared changes in size and type of MC, after a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg zoledronic acid (ZA) or placebo, among chronic LBP patients with MC on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and evaluated whether the MRI changes correlate with symptoms. Methods All patients (N = 19 in ZA, 20 in placebo) had MRI at baseline (0.23–1.5 T) and at one year (1.5-3 T). We evaluated the level, type and volume of all the MC. The MC were classified into M1 (M1 (100%)), predominating M1 (M1/2 (65:35%)) or predominating M2 (M1/2 (35:65%)), and M2 (M2 (100%)). The first two were considered M1-dominant, and the latter two M2-dominant. Volumes of M1 and M2 were calculated separately for the primary MC, which was assumed to cause the symptoms, and the other MC. We analysed the one-year treatment differences in M1 and M2 volumes using analysis of covariance with adjustments for age, sex, body mass index, and smoking. The correlations between the MRI changes and the changes in LBP symptoms were analysed using Pearson correlations. Results In the ZA group, 84.2% of patients had M1-dominant primary MC at baseline, compared to 50% in the placebo group (p = 0.041). The primary MC in the ZA group converted more likely to M2-dominant (42.1% ZA, 15% placebo; p = 0.0119). The other MC (15 ZA, 8 placebo) were on average 42% smaller and remained largely M2-dominant. The M1 volume of the primary MC decreased in the ZA group, but increased in the placebo group (−0.83 cm3 vs 0.91 cm3; p = 0.21). The adjusted treatment difference for M1 volume was −1.9 cm3 (95% CI -5.0 to 1.2; p = 0.22) and for M2 volume 0.23 cm3 (p = 0.86). In the MC that remained M1-dominant, volume change correlated positively with increased symptoms in the placebo group, whereas the correlations were negative and weak in the ZA group. Conclusions Zoledronic acid tended to speed up the conversion of M1-dominant into M2-dominant MC and decrease the volume of M1-dominant MC, although statistical significance was not demonstrated. Trial registration The registration number in ClinicalTrials.gov is NCT01330238 and the date of registration February 11, 2011.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-017-1632-zMagnetic resonance imagingModic changesType of Modic changesRandomized trialZoledronic acidLow back pain
spellingShingle Katri Koivisto
Jyri Järvinen
Jaro Karppinen
Marianne Haapea
Markus Paananen
Eero Kyllönen
Osmo Tervonen
Jaakko Niinimäki
The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Magnetic resonance imaging
Modic changes
Type of Modic changes
Randomized trial
Zoledronic acid
Low back pain
title The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain
title_full The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain
title_fullStr The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain
title_full_unstemmed The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain
title_short The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain
title_sort effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of modic changes among patients with low back pain
topic Magnetic resonance imaging
Modic changes
Type of Modic changes
Randomized trial
Zoledronic acid
Low back pain
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-017-1632-z
work_keys_str_mv AT katrikoivisto theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT jyrijarvinen theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT jarokarppinen theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT mariannehaapea theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT markuspaananen theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT eerokyllonen theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT osmotervonen theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT jaakkoniinimaki theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT katrikoivisto effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT jyrijarvinen effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT jarokarppinen effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT mariannehaapea effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT markuspaananen effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT eerokyllonen effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT osmotervonen effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain
AT jaakkoniinimaki effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain