The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain
Abstract Background Modic changes (MC) are associated with low back pain (LBP). In this study, we compared changes in size and type of MC, after a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg zoledronic acid (ZA) or placebo, among chronic LBP patients with MC on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and evaluate...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-06-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-017-1632-z |
_version_ | 1811327313794564096 |
---|---|
author | Katri Koivisto Jyri Järvinen Jaro Karppinen Marianne Haapea Markus Paananen Eero Kyllönen Osmo Tervonen Jaakko Niinimäki |
author_facet | Katri Koivisto Jyri Järvinen Jaro Karppinen Marianne Haapea Markus Paananen Eero Kyllönen Osmo Tervonen Jaakko Niinimäki |
author_sort | Katri Koivisto |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Modic changes (MC) are associated with low back pain (LBP). In this study, we compared changes in size and type of MC, after a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg zoledronic acid (ZA) or placebo, among chronic LBP patients with MC on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and evaluated whether the MRI changes correlate with symptoms. Methods All patients (N = 19 in ZA, 20 in placebo) had MRI at baseline (0.23–1.5 T) and at one year (1.5-3 T). We evaluated the level, type and volume of all the MC. The MC were classified into M1 (M1 (100%)), predominating M1 (M1/2 (65:35%)) or predominating M2 (M1/2 (35:65%)), and M2 (M2 (100%)). The first two were considered M1-dominant, and the latter two M2-dominant. Volumes of M1 and M2 were calculated separately for the primary MC, which was assumed to cause the symptoms, and the other MC. We analysed the one-year treatment differences in M1 and M2 volumes using analysis of covariance with adjustments for age, sex, body mass index, and smoking. The correlations between the MRI changes and the changes in LBP symptoms were analysed using Pearson correlations. Results In the ZA group, 84.2% of patients had M1-dominant primary MC at baseline, compared to 50% in the placebo group (p = 0.041). The primary MC in the ZA group converted more likely to M2-dominant (42.1% ZA, 15% placebo; p = 0.0119). The other MC (15 ZA, 8 placebo) were on average 42% smaller and remained largely M2-dominant. The M1 volume of the primary MC decreased in the ZA group, but increased in the placebo group (−0.83 cm3 vs 0.91 cm3; p = 0.21). The adjusted treatment difference for M1 volume was −1.9 cm3 (95% CI -5.0 to 1.2; p = 0.22) and for M2 volume 0.23 cm3 (p = 0.86). In the MC that remained M1-dominant, volume change correlated positively with increased symptoms in the placebo group, whereas the correlations were negative and weak in the ZA group. Conclusions Zoledronic acid tended to speed up the conversion of M1-dominant into M2-dominant MC and decrease the volume of M1-dominant MC, although statistical significance was not demonstrated. Trial registration The registration number in ClinicalTrials.gov is NCT01330238 and the date of registration February 11, 2011. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T15:04:26Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-852c0f7b24074b1c9397bf80a8b96e8e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2474 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T15:04:26Z |
publishDate | 2017-06-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
spelling | doaj.art-852c0f7b24074b1c9397bf80a8b96e8e2022-12-22T02:42:12ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742017-06-0118111010.1186/s12891-017-1632-zThe effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back painKatri Koivisto0Jyri Järvinen1Jaro Karppinen2Marianne Haapea3Markus Paananen4Eero Kyllönen5Osmo Tervonen6Jaakko Niinimäki7Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of OuluInstitute of Diagnostics, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University HospitalMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of OuluMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of OuluMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of OuluMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of OuluInstitute of Diagnostics, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University HospitalInstitute of Diagnostics, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University HospitalAbstract Background Modic changes (MC) are associated with low back pain (LBP). In this study, we compared changes in size and type of MC, after a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg zoledronic acid (ZA) or placebo, among chronic LBP patients with MC on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and evaluated whether the MRI changes correlate with symptoms. Methods All patients (N = 19 in ZA, 20 in placebo) had MRI at baseline (0.23–1.5 T) and at one year (1.5-3 T). We evaluated the level, type and volume of all the MC. The MC were classified into M1 (M1 (100%)), predominating M1 (M1/2 (65:35%)) or predominating M2 (M1/2 (35:65%)), and M2 (M2 (100%)). The first two were considered M1-dominant, and the latter two M2-dominant. Volumes of M1 and M2 were calculated separately for the primary MC, which was assumed to cause the symptoms, and the other MC. We analysed the one-year treatment differences in M1 and M2 volumes using analysis of covariance with adjustments for age, sex, body mass index, and smoking. The correlations between the MRI changes and the changes in LBP symptoms were analysed using Pearson correlations. Results In the ZA group, 84.2% of patients had M1-dominant primary MC at baseline, compared to 50% in the placebo group (p = 0.041). The primary MC in the ZA group converted more likely to M2-dominant (42.1% ZA, 15% placebo; p = 0.0119). The other MC (15 ZA, 8 placebo) were on average 42% smaller and remained largely M2-dominant. The M1 volume of the primary MC decreased in the ZA group, but increased in the placebo group (−0.83 cm3 vs 0.91 cm3; p = 0.21). The adjusted treatment difference for M1 volume was −1.9 cm3 (95% CI -5.0 to 1.2; p = 0.22) and for M2 volume 0.23 cm3 (p = 0.86). In the MC that remained M1-dominant, volume change correlated positively with increased symptoms in the placebo group, whereas the correlations were negative and weak in the ZA group. Conclusions Zoledronic acid tended to speed up the conversion of M1-dominant into M2-dominant MC and decrease the volume of M1-dominant MC, although statistical significance was not demonstrated. Trial registration The registration number in ClinicalTrials.gov is NCT01330238 and the date of registration February 11, 2011.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-017-1632-zMagnetic resonance imagingModic changesType of Modic changesRandomized trialZoledronic acidLow back pain |
spellingShingle | Katri Koivisto Jyri Järvinen Jaro Karppinen Marianne Haapea Markus Paananen Eero Kyllönen Osmo Tervonen Jaakko Niinimäki The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Magnetic resonance imaging Modic changes Type of Modic changes Randomized trial Zoledronic acid Low back pain |
title | The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain |
title_full | The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain |
title_fullStr | The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain |
title_short | The effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain |
title_sort | effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of modic changes among patients with low back pain |
topic | Magnetic resonance imaging Modic changes Type of Modic changes Randomized trial Zoledronic acid Low back pain |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-017-1632-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katrikoivisto theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT jyrijarvinen theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT jarokarppinen theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT mariannehaapea theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT markuspaananen theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT eerokyllonen theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT osmotervonen theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT jaakkoniinimaki theeffectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT katrikoivisto effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT jyrijarvinen effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT jarokarppinen effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT mariannehaapea effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT markuspaananen effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT eerokyllonen effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT osmotervonen effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain AT jaakkoniinimaki effectofzoledronicacidontypeandvolumeofmodicchangesamongpatientswithlowbackpain |