Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Livestock Sector: What Have We Learnt So Far?
The aim of the paper was to analyze impacts of seven years of implementation of the Nagoya Protocol on the livestock sector based on available sources of information and literature. Interim National Reports on implementation of the Nagoya Protocol provided by countries and other information availabl...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-08-01
|
| Series: | Animals |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/8/2354 |
| _version_ | 1797524916523761664 |
|---|---|
| author | Elzbieta Martyniuk Aleksandra Haska |
| author_facet | Elzbieta Martyniuk Aleksandra Haska |
| author_sort | Elzbieta Martyniuk |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of the paper was to analyze impacts of seven years of implementation of the Nagoya Protocol on the livestock sector based on available sources of information and literature. Interim National Reports on implementation of the Nagoya Protocol provided by countries and other information available at the ABS Clearing House managed by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, especially Internationally Recognized Certificates of Compliance (IRCC), were analyzed. Moreover, trends in geneflow of breeding products in selected countries, based on the national reports provided to the UN COMATRADE database, have been compared. Analysis from these sources showed limited impact of the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol for livestock breeding and conservation, as out of 2370 IRCC issued by 31 May 2021, only 573 were granted for animal genetic/biological resources including 90 with livestock as the subject matter. Only one IRCC was granted to a foreign user; all other IRCC were issued for domestic users. The intent was to use livestock genetic/biological resources as bioresources for innovation, which should lead to establishment of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) with benefits to be shared through the National Competent Authority or for research purposes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T09:04:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-85316d5b97b54919806ac1262621b952 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2076-2615 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T09:04:25Z |
| publishDate | 2021-08-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Animals |
| spelling | doaj.art-85316d5b97b54919806ac1262621b9522023-11-22T06:30:54ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-08-01118235410.3390/ani11082354Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Livestock Sector: What Have We Learnt So Far?Elzbieta Martyniuk0Aleksandra Haska1Department of Animal Genetics and Conservation, Institute of Animal Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Animal Genetics and Conservation, Institute of Animal Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, PolandThe aim of the paper was to analyze impacts of seven years of implementation of the Nagoya Protocol on the livestock sector based on available sources of information and literature. Interim National Reports on implementation of the Nagoya Protocol provided by countries and other information available at the ABS Clearing House managed by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, especially Internationally Recognized Certificates of Compliance (IRCC), were analyzed. Moreover, trends in geneflow of breeding products in selected countries, based on the national reports provided to the UN COMATRADE database, have been compared. Analysis from these sources showed limited impact of the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol for livestock breeding and conservation, as out of 2370 IRCC issued by 31 May 2021, only 573 were granted for animal genetic/biological resources including 90 with livestock as the subject matter. Only one IRCC was granted to a foreign user; all other IRCC were issued for domestic users. The intent was to use livestock genetic/biological resources as bioresources for innovation, which should lead to establishment of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) with benefits to be shared through the National Competent Authority or for research purposes.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/8/2354Nagoya Protocollivestock sectoraccess and benefit sharingIRCCanimal breeding and research |
| spellingShingle | Elzbieta Martyniuk Aleksandra Haska Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Livestock Sector: What Have We Learnt So Far? Animals Nagoya Protocol livestock sector access and benefit sharing IRCC animal breeding and research |
| title | Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Livestock Sector: What Have We Learnt So Far? |
| title_full | Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Livestock Sector: What Have We Learnt So Far? |
| title_fullStr | Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Livestock Sector: What Have We Learnt So Far? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Livestock Sector: What Have We Learnt So Far? |
| title_short | Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Livestock Sector: What Have We Learnt So Far? |
| title_sort | implementation of the nagoya protocol in livestock sector what have we learnt so far |
| topic | Nagoya Protocol livestock sector access and benefit sharing IRCC animal breeding and research |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/8/2354 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elzbietamartyniuk implementationofthenagoyaprotocolinlivestocksectorwhathavewelearntsofar AT aleksandrahaska implementationofthenagoyaprotocolinlivestocksectorwhathavewelearntsofar |