Estimation of the genetic parameters of traits relevant to feed efficiency: result from broiler lines divergent for high or low abdominal fat content
Feed consumption represents a major cost in poultry production and improving feed efficiency is one of the important goals in breeding strategies. The present study aimed to analyze the relationship between feed efficiency and relevant traits and find the proper selection method for improving feed e...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Poultry Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579120307811 |
_version_ | 1831527469960658944 |
---|---|
author | Chong Chen Zhiyong Su Yumao Li Peng Luan Shouzhi Wang Hui Zhang Fan Xiao Huaishun Guo Zhiping Cao Hui Li Li Leng |
author_facet | Chong Chen Zhiyong Su Yumao Li Peng Luan Shouzhi Wang Hui Zhang Fan Xiao Huaishun Guo Zhiping Cao Hui Li Li Leng |
author_sort | Chong Chen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Feed consumption represents a major cost in poultry production and improving feed efficiency is one of the important goals in breeding strategies. The present study aimed to analyze the relationship between feed efficiency and relevant traits and find the proper selection method for improving feed efficiency by using the Northeast Agricultural University High and Low Fat broiler lines that were divergently selected for abdominal fat content. A total of 899 birds were used to measure the feed intake (FI), abdominal fat weight (AFW), and body weight traits. The abdominal fat percentage (AFP), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and the residual feed intake (RFI) were calculated for each individual broiler. The differences in the AFW, AFP, and in traits relevant to feed efficiency, such as FCR and RFI, between the fat line and the lean line were analyzed, and the genetic parameters were estimated for AFW, AFP, and feed efficiency relevant traits. The results showed that AFW, AFP, body weight gain (BWG), FI, FCR, and RFI were significantly higher in the fat line compared with the lean line. The heritability of FI, BWG, FCR, RFI, AFW, and AFP were 0.45, 0.28, 0.36, 0.38, 0.33, and 0.30, respectively. Both FCR and RFI showed high positive genetic correlations with FI, AFW, and AFP and relatively low, negative genetic correlations with BWG. The RFI showed much higher positive genetic correlation with the abdominal fat traits than FCR. In addition, the FCR showed negative genetic correlation with body weight of 4 wk (BW4) and 7 wk (BW7), whereas RFI showed positive genetic correlation with BW4 and BW7. The results showed that both RFI and FCR could be used for improving feed efficiency. When selecting against RFI, the AFP could be significantly reduced, and by selecting against FCR, the body weight could be improved simultaneously. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-16T16:30:33Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-853b7fe92e3645789b7080f8745d0728 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0032-5791 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-16T16:30:33Z |
publishDate | 2021-02-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Poultry Science |
spelling | doaj.art-853b7fe92e3645789b7080f8745d07282022-12-21T22:24:37ZengElsevierPoultry Science0032-57912021-02-011002461466Estimation of the genetic parameters of traits relevant to feed efficiency: result from broiler lines divergent for high or low abdominal fat contentChong Chen0Zhiyong Su1Yumao Li2Peng Luan3Shouzhi Wang4Hui Zhang5Fan Xiao6Huaishun Guo7Zhiping Cao8Hui Li9Li Leng10Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P. R. ChinaFujian Sunzer Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd., Guangze 354100, Fujian Province, P. R. ChinaFujian Sunzer Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd., Guangze 354100, Fujian Province, P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P. R. ChinaKey Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P. R. China; Corresponding author:Feed consumption represents a major cost in poultry production and improving feed efficiency is one of the important goals in breeding strategies. The present study aimed to analyze the relationship between feed efficiency and relevant traits and find the proper selection method for improving feed efficiency by using the Northeast Agricultural University High and Low Fat broiler lines that were divergently selected for abdominal fat content. A total of 899 birds were used to measure the feed intake (FI), abdominal fat weight (AFW), and body weight traits. The abdominal fat percentage (AFP), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and the residual feed intake (RFI) were calculated for each individual broiler. The differences in the AFW, AFP, and in traits relevant to feed efficiency, such as FCR and RFI, between the fat line and the lean line were analyzed, and the genetic parameters were estimated for AFW, AFP, and feed efficiency relevant traits. The results showed that AFW, AFP, body weight gain (BWG), FI, FCR, and RFI were significantly higher in the fat line compared with the lean line. The heritability of FI, BWG, FCR, RFI, AFW, and AFP were 0.45, 0.28, 0.36, 0.38, 0.33, and 0.30, respectively. Both FCR and RFI showed high positive genetic correlations with FI, AFW, and AFP and relatively low, negative genetic correlations with BWG. The RFI showed much higher positive genetic correlation with the abdominal fat traits than FCR. In addition, the FCR showed negative genetic correlation with body weight of 4 wk (BW4) and 7 wk (BW7), whereas RFI showed positive genetic correlation with BW4 and BW7. The results showed that both RFI and FCR could be used for improving feed efficiency. When selecting against RFI, the AFP could be significantly reduced, and by selecting against FCR, the body weight could be improved simultaneously.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579120307811feed efficiencyabdominal fatbody weightgenetic parameterbroiler |
spellingShingle | Chong Chen Zhiyong Su Yumao Li Peng Luan Shouzhi Wang Hui Zhang Fan Xiao Huaishun Guo Zhiping Cao Hui Li Li Leng Estimation of the genetic parameters of traits relevant to feed efficiency: result from broiler lines divergent for high or low abdominal fat content Poultry Science feed efficiency abdominal fat body weight genetic parameter broiler |
title | Estimation of the genetic parameters of traits relevant to feed efficiency: result from broiler lines divergent for high or low abdominal fat content |
title_full | Estimation of the genetic parameters of traits relevant to feed efficiency: result from broiler lines divergent for high or low abdominal fat content |
title_fullStr | Estimation of the genetic parameters of traits relevant to feed efficiency: result from broiler lines divergent for high or low abdominal fat content |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of the genetic parameters of traits relevant to feed efficiency: result from broiler lines divergent for high or low abdominal fat content |
title_short | Estimation of the genetic parameters of traits relevant to feed efficiency: result from broiler lines divergent for high or low abdominal fat content |
title_sort | estimation of the genetic parameters of traits relevant to feed efficiency result from broiler lines divergent for high or low abdominal fat content |
topic | feed efficiency abdominal fat body weight genetic parameter broiler |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579120307811 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chongchen estimationofthegeneticparametersoftraitsrelevanttofeedefficiencyresultfrombroilerlinesdivergentforhighorlowabdominalfatcontent AT zhiyongsu estimationofthegeneticparametersoftraitsrelevanttofeedefficiencyresultfrombroilerlinesdivergentforhighorlowabdominalfatcontent AT yumaoli estimationofthegeneticparametersoftraitsrelevanttofeedefficiencyresultfrombroilerlinesdivergentforhighorlowabdominalfatcontent AT pengluan estimationofthegeneticparametersoftraitsrelevanttofeedefficiencyresultfrombroilerlinesdivergentforhighorlowabdominalfatcontent AT shouzhiwang estimationofthegeneticparametersoftraitsrelevanttofeedefficiencyresultfrombroilerlinesdivergentforhighorlowabdominalfatcontent AT huizhang estimationofthegeneticparametersoftraitsrelevanttofeedefficiencyresultfrombroilerlinesdivergentforhighorlowabdominalfatcontent AT fanxiao estimationofthegeneticparametersoftraitsrelevanttofeedefficiencyresultfrombroilerlinesdivergentforhighorlowabdominalfatcontent AT huaishunguo estimationofthegeneticparametersoftraitsrelevanttofeedefficiencyresultfrombroilerlinesdivergentforhighorlowabdominalfatcontent AT zhipingcao estimationofthegeneticparametersoftraitsrelevanttofeedefficiencyresultfrombroilerlinesdivergentforhighorlowabdominalfatcontent AT huili estimationofthegeneticparametersoftraitsrelevanttofeedefficiencyresultfrombroilerlinesdivergentforhighorlowabdominalfatcontent AT lileng estimationofthegeneticparametersoftraitsrelevanttofeedefficiencyresultfrombroilerlinesdivergentforhighorlowabdominalfatcontent |