Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2

Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for COVID-19 based on lateral flow immunoassays are useful for rapid diagnosis in a variety of settings. Although many kinds of RATs are available, their respective sensitivity has not been compared. Here, we examined the sensitivity of 27 RATs available in Japan for the d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuko Sakai-Tagawa, Seiya Yamayoshi, Peter J. Halfmann, Yoshihiro Kawaoka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Viruses
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/11/2183
_version_ 1797508215088349184
author Yuko Sakai-Tagawa
Seiya Yamayoshi
Peter J. Halfmann
Yoshihiro Kawaoka
author_facet Yuko Sakai-Tagawa
Seiya Yamayoshi
Peter J. Halfmann
Yoshihiro Kawaoka
author_sort Yuko Sakai-Tagawa
collection DOAJ
description Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for COVID-19 based on lateral flow immunoassays are useful for rapid diagnosis in a variety of settings. Although many kinds of RATs are available, their respective sensitivity has not been compared. Here, we examined the sensitivity of 27 RATs available in Japan for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. All of the RATs tested detected the delta variant albeit with different sensitivities. Nine RATs (ESPLINE SARS-CoV-2, ALSONIC COVID-19 Ag, COVID-19 and Influenza A+B Antigen Combo Rapid Test, ImmunoArrow SARS-CoV-2, Fuji Dri-chem immuno AG cartridge COVID-19 Ag, 2019-nCoV Ag rapid detection kit, Saliva SARS-CoV-2(2019-nCoV) Antigen Test Kit, and Rabliss SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection kit COVID19 AG) showed superior sensitivity to the isolated delta variant. Although actual clinical specimens were not examined, the detection level of most of the RATs was 7500 pfu, indicating that individuals whose test samples contained less virus than that would be considered negative. Therefore, it is important to bear in mind that RATs may miss individuals shedding low levels of infectious virus.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T04:59:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8553804083414326bc8194d3b5a8f53b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4915
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T04:59:18Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Viruses
spelling doaj.art-8553804083414326bc8194d3b5a8f53b2023-11-23T01:56:20ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152021-10-011311218310.3390/v13112183Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2Yuko Sakai-Tagawa0Seiya Yamayoshi1Peter J. Halfmann2Yoshihiro Kawaoka3Division of Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, JapanDivision of Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, JapanDepartment of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USADivision of Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, JapanRapid antigen tests (RATs) for COVID-19 based on lateral flow immunoassays are useful for rapid diagnosis in a variety of settings. Although many kinds of RATs are available, their respective sensitivity has not been compared. Here, we examined the sensitivity of 27 RATs available in Japan for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. All of the RATs tested detected the delta variant albeit with different sensitivities. Nine RATs (ESPLINE SARS-CoV-2, ALSONIC COVID-19 Ag, COVID-19 and Influenza A+B Antigen Combo Rapid Test, ImmunoArrow SARS-CoV-2, Fuji Dri-chem immuno AG cartridge COVID-19 Ag, 2019-nCoV Ag rapid detection kit, Saliva SARS-CoV-2(2019-nCoV) Antigen Test Kit, and Rabliss SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection kit COVID19 AG) showed superior sensitivity to the isolated delta variant. Although actual clinical specimens were not examined, the detection level of most of the RATs was 7500 pfu, indicating that individuals whose test samples contained less virus than that would be considered negative. Therefore, it is important to bear in mind that RATs may miss individuals shedding low levels of infectious virus.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/11/2183SARS-CoV-2COVID-19rapid antigen testsensitivitydelta variantB.1.617.2
spellingShingle Yuko Sakai-Tagawa
Seiya Yamayoshi
Peter J. Halfmann
Yoshihiro Kawaoka
Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2
Viruses
SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
rapid antigen test
sensitivity
delta variant
B.1.617.2
title Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2
title_full Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2
title_short Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2
title_sort comparative sensitivity of rapid antigen tests for the delta variant b 1 617 2 of sars cov 2
topic SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
rapid antigen test
sensitivity
delta variant
B.1.617.2
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/11/2183
work_keys_str_mv AT yukosakaitagawa comparativesensitivityofrapidantigentestsforthedeltavariantb16172ofsarscov2
AT seiyayamayoshi comparativesensitivityofrapidantigentestsforthedeltavariantb16172ofsarscov2
AT peterjhalfmann comparativesensitivityofrapidantigentestsforthedeltavariantb16172ofsarscov2
AT yoshihirokawaoka comparativesensitivityofrapidantigentestsforthedeltavariantb16172ofsarscov2