Finite element mechanical analysis of ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery

Abstract Background Unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery (UBE) is often performed to treat lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation. It has become a prominent method in endoscopic spine surgery because of its very low learning curve and broader operative field of vision. Currently, the ip...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wenzheng Li, Junjian Han, Qingyun Xin, Qitao Liu, Chao Feng, Yichan Liu, Dengjun Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04476-z
_version_ 1797376848741531648
author Wenzheng Li
Junjian Han
Qingyun Xin
Qitao Liu
Chao Feng
Yichan Liu
Dengjun Zhang
author_facet Wenzheng Li
Junjian Han
Qingyun Xin
Qitao Liu
Chao Feng
Yichan Liu
Dengjun Zhang
author_sort Wenzheng Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery (UBE) is often performed to treat lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation. It has become a prominent method in endoscopic spine surgery because of its very low learning curve and broader operative field of vision. Currently, the ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach have been established for disc herniation in the foraminal area, intervertebral foramen region, or pedicle region. The contralateral method offers many benefits over the ipsilateral approach, including less bone labour during microsurgical decompression and the preservation of facet joints. However, because it uses the interlaminar window approach, it inevitably involves osteotomy of the patient’s superior and inferior articular processes, which may result in corresponding deterioration in the spine’s biomechanical stability and subsequent adjacent facet joint diseases caused by facet joint degeneration postoperatively. Objective As a result, the purpose of this work is to use a finite element model to evaluate how the ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery affect spinal stability while treating identical intervertebral disc herniation. Study design In this study, a three-dimensional lumbar-sacral spine model was built and verified. Osteotomies were conducted for armpit-type lumbar disc herniation (LDH), periradicular-type LDH, and shoulder-type LDH. Postoperative lumbar spine models of the ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery were developed. The von Mises stress on the endplate, shear force on the annulus fibrosus, pressure inside the intervertebral disc, and range of motion (ROM) of the L3 segment were all determined. The results of our well-validated model showed that osteotomy done in the ipsilateral approach deteriorated most biomechanical metrics. Results In the majority of loading conditions, the contralateral approach caused the intervertebral disc’s biomechanical properties to increase, and the ipsilateral approach caused the intervertebral disc’s biomechanical properties to increase sharply more than the contralateral approach. Conclusion The contralateral approach, which is now extensively employed in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery, may be regarded as an ideal surgical alternative for treating lumbar disc herniation without producing iatrogenic instability. This approach has a low facet joint reduction rate, minimum soft tissue injury, and precisely identifies the midline of the central spinal canal during the retraction of the thecal sac and nerve roots.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:45:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-855a1eb15e354302ba1874c607d95fdd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:45:29Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-855a1eb15e354302ba1874c607d95fdd2023-12-24T12:24:30ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2023-12-0118111410.1186/s13018-023-04476-zFinite element mechanical analysis of ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgeryWenzheng Li0Junjian Han1Qingyun Xin2Qitao Liu3Chao Feng4Yichan Liu5Dengjun Zhang6Department of Orthopaedics, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical UniversityShanxi University of Chinese MedicineDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical UniversityAbstract Background Unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery (UBE) is often performed to treat lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation. It has become a prominent method in endoscopic spine surgery because of its very low learning curve and broader operative field of vision. Currently, the ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach have been established for disc herniation in the foraminal area, intervertebral foramen region, or pedicle region. The contralateral method offers many benefits over the ipsilateral approach, including less bone labour during microsurgical decompression and the preservation of facet joints. However, because it uses the interlaminar window approach, it inevitably involves osteotomy of the patient’s superior and inferior articular processes, which may result in corresponding deterioration in the spine’s biomechanical stability and subsequent adjacent facet joint diseases caused by facet joint degeneration postoperatively. Objective As a result, the purpose of this work is to use a finite element model to evaluate how the ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery affect spinal stability while treating identical intervertebral disc herniation. Study design In this study, a three-dimensional lumbar-sacral spine model was built and verified. Osteotomies were conducted for armpit-type lumbar disc herniation (LDH), periradicular-type LDH, and shoulder-type LDH. Postoperative lumbar spine models of the ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery were developed. The von Mises stress on the endplate, shear force on the annulus fibrosus, pressure inside the intervertebral disc, and range of motion (ROM) of the L3 segment were all determined. The results of our well-validated model showed that osteotomy done in the ipsilateral approach deteriorated most biomechanical metrics. Results In the majority of loading conditions, the contralateral approach caused the intervertebral disc’s biomechanical properties to increase, and the ipsilateral approach caused the intervertebral disc’s biomechanical properties to increase sharply more than the contralateral approach. Conclusion The contralateral approach, which is now extensively employed in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery, may be regarded as an ideal surgical alternative for treating lumbar disc herniation without producing iatrogenic instability. This approach has a low facet joint reduction rate, minimum soft tissue injury, and precisely identifies the midline of the central spinal canal during the retraction of the thecal sac and nerve roots.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04476-zUnilateral bilateral endoscopyLumbar herniated discContralateral approachFinite element methodSpine
spellingShingle Wenzheng Li
Junjian Han
Qingyun Xin
Qitao Liu
Chao Feng
Yichan Liu
Dengjun Zhang
Finite element mechanical analysis of ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Unilateral bilateral endoscopy
Lumbar herniated disc
Contralateral approach
Finite element method
Spine
title Finite element mechanical analysis of ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery
title_full Finite element mechanical analysis of ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery
title_fullStr Finite element mechanical analysis of ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery
title_full_unstemmed Finite element mechanical analysis of ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery
title_short Finite element mechanical analysis of ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery
title_sort finite element mechanical analysis of ipsilateral approach and contralateral approach in unilateral bilateral endoscopic spine surgery
topic Unilateral bilateral endoscopy
Lumbar herniated disc
Contralateral approach
Finite element method
Spine
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04476-z
work_keys_str_mv AT wenzhengli finiteelementmechanicalanalysisofipsilateralapproachandcontralateralapproachinunilateralbilateralendoscopicspinesurgery
AT junjianhan finiteelementmechanicalanalysisofipsilateralapproachandcontralateralapproachinunilateralbilateralendoscopicspinesurgery
AT qingyunxin finiteelementmechanicalanalysisofipsilateralapproachandcontralateralapproachinunilateralbilateralendoscopicspinesurgery
AT qitaoliu finiteelementmechanicalanalysisofipsilateralapproachandcontralateralapproachinunilateralbilateralendoscopicspinesurgery
AT chaofeng finiteelementmechanicalanalysisofipsilateralapproachandcontralateralapproachinunilateralbilateralendoscopicspinesurgery
AT yichanliu finiteelementmechanicalanalysisofipsilateralapproachandcontralateralapproachinunilateralbilateralendoscopicspinesurgery
AT dengjunzhang finiteelementmechanicalanalysisofipsilateralapproachandcontralateralapproachinunilateralbilateralendoscopicspinesurgery