Fake News and Internet Shutdowns in Indonesia: Symptoms of Failure to Uphold Democracy

The Indonesian government limited or shut down internet access during separate riots in Jakarta and Papua in 2019. The justification for blocking the internet and disabling certain features of social media platforms was to quell the unrest by ceasing the spread of fake news. Nevertheless, the govern...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rofi Aulia Rahman, Shu-Mei Tang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indoneisa 2022-06-01
Series:Constitutional Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://consrev.mkri.id/index.php/const-rev/article/view/1734
_version_ 1811326270269554688
author Rofi Aulia Rahman
Shu-Mei Tang
author_facet Rofi Aulia Rahman
Shu-Mei Tang
author_sort Rofi Aulia Rahman
collection DOAJ
description The Indonesian government limited or shut down internet access during separate riots in Jakarta and Papua in 2019. The justification for blocking the internet and disabling certain features of social media platforms was to quell the unrest by ceasing the spread of fake news. Nevertheless, the government did not declare a state of emergency in response to either situation, triggering debate on whether the internet restrictions had any strong constitutional basis or if they were out of proportion and unconstitutional. This study evaluates the government’s policy on internet shutdowns to reduce the spread of fake news amid riots, and explicates when the state of emergency “feature” might be activated. The research method of this article is a doctrinal legal approach, which critically examines whether the government policy was excessive, and to what extent a state of emergency can be implemented by minimum standard requirements. The result of this study shows the riots in Jakarta and Papua ought not be categorized as national threats; hence, the internet shutdown was out of proportion. Fake news is part of the price we pay for a free society; thus the article argues that an internet shutdown is not a proper way to combat fakenews. Furthermore, the government has failed to fulfill the minimum standards to justify the internet shutdowns. Access to the internet is a new face of democratic pillars, so blocking internet access without any sufficient legal instruments and correct constitutional interpretation might indicate symptoms of a failure to uphold democracy.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T14:47:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-855d27940729437bbbe88eec89cc56c6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2460-0016
2548-3870
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T14:47:07Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indoneisa
record_format Article
series Constitutional Review
spelling doaj.art-855d27940729437bbbe88eec89cc56c62022-12-22T02:42:43ZengConstitutional Court of the Republic of IndoneisaConstitutional Review2460-00162548-38702022-06-018115118310.31078/consrev816498Fake News and Internet Shutdowns in Indonesia: Symptoms of Failure to Uphold DemocracyRofi Aulia Rahman0Shu-Mei Tang1Unversitas SurabayaASIA UNIVERSITYThe Indonesian government limited or shut down internet access during separate riots in Jakarta and Papua in 2019. The justification for blocking the internet and disabling certain features of social media platforms was to quell the unrest by ceasing the spread of fake news. Nevertheless, the government did not declare a state of emergency in response to either situation, triggering debate on whether the internet restrictions had any strong constitutional basis or if they were out of proportion and unconstitutional. This study evaluates the government’s policy on internet shutdowns to reduce the spread of fake news amid riots, and explicates when the state of emergency “feature” might be activated. The research method of this article is a doctrinal legal approach, which critically examines whether the government policy was excessive, and to what extent a state of emergency can be implemented by minimum standard requirements. The result of this study shows the riots in Jakarta and Papua ought not be categorized as national threats; hence, the internet shutdown was out of proportion. Fake news is part of the price we pay for a free society; thus the article argues that an internet shutdown is not a proper way to combat fakenews. Furthermore, the government has failed to fulfill the minimum standards to justify the internet shutdowns. Access to the internet is a new face of democratic pillars, so blocking internet access without any sufficient legal instruments and correct constitutional interpretation might indicate symptoms of a failure to uphold democracy.https://consrev.mkri.id/index.php/const-rev/article/view/1734democracy, fake news, human rights, internet shutdown, state of emergency.
spellingShingle Rofi Aulia Rahman
Shu-Mei Tang
Fake News and Internet Shutdowns in Indonesia: Symptoms of Failure to Uphold Democracy
Constitutional Review
democracy, fake news, human rights, internet shutdown, state of emergency.
title Fake News and Internet Shutdowns in Indonesia: Symptoms of Failure to Uphold Democracy
title_full Fake News and Internet Shutdowns in Indonesia: Symptoms of Failure to Uphold Democracy
title_fullStr Fake News and Internet Shutdowns in Indonesia: Symptoms of Failure to Uphold Democracy
title_full_unstemmed Fake News and Internet Shutdowns in Indonesia: Symptoms of Failure to Uphold Democracy
title_short Fake News and Internet Shutdowns in Indonesia: Symptoms of Failure to Uphold Democracy
title_sort fake news and internet shutdowns in indonesia symptoms of failure to uphold democracy
topic democracy, fake news, human rights, internet shutdown, state of emergency.
url https://consrev.mkri.id/index.php/const-rev/article/view/1734
work_keys_str_mv AT rofiauliarahman fakenewsandinternetshutdownsinindonesiasymptomsoffailuretoupholddemocracy
AT shumeitang fakenewsandinternetshutdownsinindonesiasymptomsoffailuretoupholddemocracy