Comparison of Cloud Amounts Retrieved with Three Automatic Methods and Visual Observations

Four methods have been used for the estimation of the total cloud amount and cloud amount for low clouds: visual observations, the Long method applied on pyranometer measurements, the Automatic Partial Cloud Amount Detection Algorithm (APCADA) method applied on pyrgeometers measurements, and ceilome...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: María Pilar Utrillas, María José Marín, Víctor Estellés, Carlos Marcos, María Dolores Freile, José Luis Gómez-Amo, José Antonio Martínez-Lozano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/6/937
_version_ 1797490078128275456
author María Pilar Utrillas
María José Marín
Víctor Estellés
Carlos Marcos
María Dolores Freile
José Luis Gómez-Amo
José Antonio Martínez-Lozano
author_facet María Pilar Utrillas
María José Marín
Víctor Estellés
Carlos Marcos
María Dolores Freile
José Luis Gómez-Amo
José Antonio Martínez-Lozano
author_sort María Pilar Utrillas
collection DOAJ
description Four methods have been used for the estimation of the total cloud amount and cloud amount for low clouds: visual observations, the Long method applied on pyranometer measurements, the Automatic Partial Cloud Amount Detection Algorithm (APCADA) method applied on pyrgeometers measurements, and ceilometer measurements of the cloud base height. Records from meteorological observers indicate that clear days (0–1 octa) represent the most frequent cloud amount for low clouds. In contrast, the total cloud amount is more aleatory. Results obtained from the Long method show maximum frequency in the extreme cloud amount values. The APCADA method also indicates the predominance of cloudless skies. The ceilometer method shows a predominance of completely clear skies, but the completely cloudy (8 octas) is the second most frequent case. Automatic methods report more cloudless and overcast skies than the observer. Automatic methods agree with the visual method or differ in ±1 octa for 60–76% cases for low cloud amount and for 56–63% cases for total cloud amount. In general, low cloud amount agrees more with observer measurements than total cloud amount and the automatic methods underestimated total cloud amount observer values possibly due to the difficulty in monitoring high clouds.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T00:26:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8566d7a0c32149dab36a2e589501c266
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4433
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T00:26:45Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Atmosphere
spelling doaj.art-8566d7a0c32149dab36a2e589501c2662023-11-23T15:33:03ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332022-06-0113693710.3390/atmos13060937Comparison of Cloud Amounts Retrieved with Three Automatic Methods and Visual ObservationsMaría Pilar Utrillas0María José Marín1Víctor Estellés2Carlos Marcos3María Dolores Freile4José Luis Gómez-Amo5José Antonio Martínez-Lozano6Solar Radiation Group, Departament de Física de la Terra i Termodinàmica, Universitat de València, 46100 Burjassot, SpainSolar Radiation Group, Departament de Matemàtiques per a l’Economia i l’Empresa, Universitat de València, 46022 Valencia, SpainSolar Radiation Group, Departament de Física de la Terra i Termodinàmica, Universitat de València, 46100 Burjassot, SpainSolar Radiation Group, Departament de Física de la Terra i Termodinàmica, Universitat de València, 46100 Burjassot, SpainSolar Radiation Group, Departament de Física de la Terra i Termodinàmica, Universitat de València, 46100 Burjassot, SpainSolar Radiation Group, Departament de Física de la Terra i Termodinàmica, Universitat de València, 46100 Burjassot, SpainSolar Radiation Group, Departament de Física de la Terra i Termodinàmica, Universitat de València, 46100 Burjassot, SpainFour methods have been used for the estimation of the total cloud amount and cloud amount for low clouds: visual observations, the Long method applied on pyranometer measurements, the Automatic Partial Cloud Amount Detection Algorithm (APCADA) method applied on pyrgeometers measurements, and ceilometer measurements of the cloud base height. Records from meteorological observers indicate that clear days (0–1 octa) represent the most frequent cloud amount for low clouds. In contrast, the total cloud amount is more aleatory. Results obtained from the Long method show maximum frequency in the extreme cloud amount values. The APCADA method also indicates the predominance of cloudless skies. The ceilometer method shows a predominance of completely clear skies, but the completely cloudy (8 octas) is the second most frequent case. Automatic methods report more cloudless and overcast skies than the observer. Automatic methods agree with the visual method or differ in ±1 octa for 60–76% cases for low cloud amount and for 56–63% cases for total cloud amount. In general, low cloud amount agrees more with observer measurements than total cloud amount and the automatic methods underestimated total cloud amount observer values possibly due to the difficulty in monitoring high clouds.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/6/937cloud covervisual cloud observationsautomatic cloud observations
spellingShingle María Pilar Utrillas
María José Marín
Víctor Estellés
Carlos Marcos
María Dolores Freile
José Luis Gómez-Amo
José Antonio Martínez-Lozano
Comparison of Cloud Amounts Retrieved with Three Automatic Methods and Visual Observations
Atmosphere
cloud cover
visual cloud observations
automatic cloud observations
title Comparison of Cloud Amounts Retrieved with Three Automatic Methods and Visual Observations
title_full Comparison of Cloud Amounts Retrieved with Three Automatic Methods and Visual Observations
title_fullStr Comparison of Cloud Amounts Retrieved with Three Automatic Methods and Visual Observations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Cloud Amounts Retrieved with Three Automatic Methods and Visual Observations
title_short Comparison of Cloud Amounts Retrieved with Three Automatic Methods and Visual Observations
title_sort comparison of cloud amounts retrieved with three automatic methods and visual observations
topic cloud cover
visual cloud observations
automatic cloud observations
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/6/937
work_keys_str_mv AT mariapilarutrillas comparisonofcloudamountsretrievedwiththreeautomaticmethodsandvisualobservations
AT mariajosemarin comparisonofcloudamountsretrievedwiththreeautomaticmethodsandvisualobservations
AT victorestelles comparisonofcloudamountsretrievedwiththreeautomaticmethodsandvisualobservations
AT carlosmarcos comparisonofcloudamountsretrievedwiththreeautomaticmethodsandvisualobservations
AT mariadoloresfreile comparisonofcloudamountsretrievedwiththreeautomaticmethodsandvisualobservations
AT joseluisgomezamo comparisonofcloudamountsretrievedwiththreeautomaticmethodsandvisualobservations
AT joseantoniomartinezlozano comparisonofcloudamountsretrievedwiththreeautomaticmethodsandvisualobservations