Modulation of incentivized dishonesty by disgust facial expressions

Disgust modulates moral decisions involving harming others. We recently specified that this effect is bi-directionally modulated by individual sensitivity to disgust. Here, we show that this effect generalizes to the moral domain of honesty and extends to outcomes with real-world impact. We employed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julian eLim, Paul eHo, O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2015.00250/full
_version_ 1828276544746815488
author Julian eLim
Julian eLim
Paul eHo
O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman
O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman
O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman
author_facet Julian eLim
Julian eLim
Paul eHo
O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman
O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman
O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman
author_sort Julian eLim
collection DOAJ
description Disgust modulates moral decisions involving harming others. We recently specified that this effect is bi-directionally modulated by individual sensitivity to disgust. Here, we show that this effect generalizes to the moral domain of honesty and extends to outcomes with real-world impact. We employed a dice-rolling task in which participants were incentivized to dishonestly report outcomes to increase their potential final monetary payoff. Disgust or control facial expressions were presented subliminally on each trial. Our results reveal that the disgust facial expressions altered honest reporting as a bi-directional function moderated by individual sensitivity. Combining these data with those from prior experiments revealed that the effect of disgust presentation on both harm judgments and honesty could be accounted for by the same bidirectional function, with no significant effect of domain. This clearly demonstrates that disgust facial expressions produce the same modulation of moral judgments across different moral foundations (harm and honesty). Our results suggest strong overlap in the cognitive/neural processes of moral judgments across moral foundations, and provide a framework for further studies to specify the integration of emotional information in moral decision making.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:59:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-85766d78844a470e89055565defbd23d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T06:59:00Z
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-85766d78844a470e89055565defbd23d2022-12-22T02:57:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2015-07-01910.3389/fnins.2015.00250150666Modulation of incentivized dishonesty by disgust facial expressionsJulian eLim0Julian eLim1Paul eHo2O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman3O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman4O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman5Duke-NUS Graduate Medical SchoolNational University of SingaporeNational University of SingaporeNational University of SingaporeDuke-NUS Graduate Medical SchoolNational University of SingaporeDisgust modulates moral decisions involving harming others. We recently specified that this effect is bi-directionally modulated by individual sensitivity to disgust. Here, we show that this effect generalizes to the moral domain of honesty and extends to outcomes with real-world impact. We employed a dice-rolling task in which participants were incentivized to dishonestly report outcomes to increase their potential final monetary payoff. Disgust or control facial expressions were presented subliminally on each trial. Our results reveal that the disgust facial expressions altered honest reporting as a bi-directional function moderated by individual sensitivity. Combining these data with those from prior experiments revealed that the effect of disgust presentation on both harm judgments and honesty could be accounted for by the same bidirectional function, with no significant effect of domain. This clearly demonstrates that disgust facial expressions produce the same modulation of moral judgments across different moral foundations (harm and honesty). Our results suggest strong overlap in the cognitive/neural processes of moral judgments across moral foundations, and provide a framework for further studies to specify the integration of emotional information in moral decision making.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2015.00250/fullDecision MakingJudgmentindividual differencesFacial Expressionprimingchoice
spellingShingle Julian eLim
Julian eLim
Paul eHo
O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman
O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman
O'Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman
Modulation of incentivized dishonesty by disgust facial expressions
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Decision Making
Judgment
individual differences
Facial Expression
priming
choice
title Modulation of incentivized dishonesty by disgust facial expressions
title_full Modulation of incentivized dishonesty by disgust facial expressions
title_fullStr Modulation of incentivized dishonesty by disgust facial expressions
title_full_unstemmed Modulation of incentivized dishonesty by disgust facial expressions
title_short Modulation of incentivized dishonesty by disgust facial expressions
title_sort modulation of incentivized dishonesty by disgust facial expressions
topic Decision Making
Judgment
individual differences
Facial Expression
priming
choice
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2015.00250/full
work_keys_str_mv AT julianelim modulationofincentivizeddishonestybydisgustfacialexpressions
AT julianelim modulationofincentivizeddishonestybydisgustfacialexpressions
AT pauleho modulationofincentivizeddishonestybydisgustfacialexpressions
AT odhanielamullettegillman modulationofincentivizeddishonestybydisgustfacialexpressions
AT odhanielamullettegillman modulationofincentivizeddishonestybydisgustfacialexpressions
AT odhanielamullettegillman modulationofincentivizeddishonestybydisgustfacialexpressions