Outcomes of cataract surgery in a rural and urban south Indian population

<b>Purpose:</b> To assess the visual outcome after cataract surgery in a south Indian population. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Population-based cross-sectional study of subjects aged 40 years or more. Three thousand nine hundred and twenty-four rural subjects from 27 cont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vijaya Lingam, George Ronnie, Rashima A, Raju Prema, Arvind Hemamalini, Baskaran Mani, Ve Ramesh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2010-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2010;volume=58;issue=3;spage=223;epage=228;aulast=Vijaya
_version_ 1818465835382996992
author Vijaya Lingam
George Ronnie
Rashima A
Raju Prema
Arvind Hemamalini
Baskaran Mani
Ve Ramesh
author_facet Vijaya Lingam
George Ronnie
Rashima A
Raju Prema
Arvind Hemamalini
Baskaran Mani
Ve Ramesh
author_sort Vijaya Lingam
collection DOAJ
description <b>Purpose:</b> To assess the visual outcome after cataract surgery in a south Indian population. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Population-based cross-sectional study of subjects aged 40 years or more. Three thousand nine hundred and twenty-four rural subjects from 27 contiguous villages and 3850 urban subjects from five randomly selected divisions were studied. All subjects underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination that included visual acuity, refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, and dilated retinal examination. <b> Statistical Analysis:</b> Chi square test, <i>t</i> test and multivariate analysis were used.<b> Results:</b> Five hundred and twenty-eight (216 males, 312 females, 781 eyes) rural subjects (13.5&#x0025;, 95&#x0025; confidence interval (CI) 12.4&#x0025; to 14.6&#x0025;) and 406 (197 males, 209 females, 604 eyes) urban subjects (10.5&#x0025;, 95&#x0025; CI 9.6-11.5&#x0025;) had undergone cataract surgery. Outcome of cataract surgery was defined based on visual acuity. Using best-corrected visual acuity for classification, the single most important cause for visual impairment was cystoid macular edema in the aphakic group and posterior capsule opacification in the pseudophakic group. Aphakia (visual acuity of &lt; 20/60 to &#8804; 20/400 - odds ratio (OR) 1.8; 95&#x0025; CI 1.3 to 2.6&#x0025;, visual acuity of &lt; 20/400 - OR 6.2; 95&#x0025; 4.0 to 9.8&#x0025;), rural residence (visual acuity of &lt; 20/60 to &#8804; 20/400 - OR 3.2; 95&#x0025; CI 2.2 to 4.5&#x0025; and visual acuity of &lt; 20/400 - OR OR 3.5; 95&#x0025; CI 2.3 to 5.5&#x0025;) were associated with visual impairment. The urban cataract-operated population had significantly more pseudophakics (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001), men (<i> P</i> = 0.02) and literates (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001). In the rural group the prevalence of cataract surgery (13.5&#x0025; vs. 10.5&#x0025;, <i> P</i> &lt; 0.001) and number of people that had undergone cataract surgery within three years prior to examination (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001) were significantly greater. In 30&#x0025; of rural and 16&#x0025; of urban subjects uncorrected refraction was the cause of visual impairment. <b> Conclusions:</b> Surgery-related complications were major causes for visual acuity of &lt; 20/60.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:50:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-85863d5c6c4944d09329ad82395161a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:50:56Z
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-85863d5c6c4944d09329ad82395161a52022-12-22T02:30:31ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892010-01-01583223228Outcomes of cataract surgery in a rural and urban south Indian populationVijaya LingamGeorge RonnieRashima ARaju PremaArvind HemamaliniBaskaran ManiVe Ramesh<b>Purpose:</b> To assess the visual outcome after cataract surgery in a south Indian population. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Population-based cross-sectional study of subjects aged 40 years or more. Three thousand nine hundred and twenty-four rural subjects from 27 contiguous villages and 3850 urban subjects from five randomly selected divisions were studied. All subjects underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination that included visual acuity, refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, and dilated retinal examination. <b> Statistical Analysis:</b> Chi square test, <i>t</i> test and multivariate analysis were used.<b> Results:</b> Five hundred and twenty-eight (216 males, 312 females, 781 eyes) rural subjects (13.5&#x0025;, 95&#x0025; confidence interval (CI) 12.4&#x0025; to 14.6&#x0025;) and 406 (197 males, 209 females, 604 eyes) urban subjects (10.5&#x0025;, 95&#x0025; CI 9.6-11.5&#x0025;) had undergone cataract surgery. Outcome of cataract surgery was defined based on visual acuity. Using best-corrected visual acuity for classification, the single most important cause for visual impairment was cystoid macular edema in the aphakic group and posterior capsule opacification in the pseudophakic group. Aphakia (visual acuity of &lt; 20/60 to &#8804; 20/400 - odds ratio (OR) 1.8; 95&#x0025; CI 1.3 to 2.6&#x0025;, visual acuity of &lt; 20/400 - OR 6.2; 95&#x0025; 4.0 to 9.8&#x0025;), rural residence (visual acuity of &lt; 20/60 to &#8804; 20/400 - OR 3.2; 95&#x0025; CI 2.2 to 4.5&#x0025; and visual acuity of &lt; 20/400 - OR OR 3.5; 95&#x0025; CI 2.3 to 5.5&#x0025;) were associated with visual impairment. The urban cataract-operated population had significantly more pseudophakics (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001), men (<i> P</i> = 0.02) and literates (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001). In the rural group the prevalence of cataract surgery (13.5&#x0025; vs. 10.5&#x0025;, <i> P</i> &lt; 0.001) and number of people that had undergone cataract surgery within three years prior to examination (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001) were significantly greater. In 30&#x0025; of rural and 16&#x0025; of urban subjects uncorrected refraction was the cause of visual impairment. <b> Conclusions:</b> Surgery-related complications were major causes for visual acuity of &lt; 20/60.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2010;volume=58;issue=3;spage=223;epage=228;aulast=VijayaCataract surgeryepidemiologyIndiapopulationvisual impairment
spellingShingle Vijaya Lingam
George Ronnie
Rashima A
Raju Prema
Arvind Hemamalini
Baskaran Mani
Ve Ramesh
Outcomes of cataract surgery in a rural and urban south Indian population
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Cataract surgery
epidemiology
India
population
visual impairment
title Outcomes of cataract surgery in a rural and urban south Indian population
title_full Outcomes of cataract surgery in a rural and urban south Indian population
title_fullStr Outcomes of cataract surgery in a rural and urban south Indian population
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of cataract surgery in a rural and urban south Indian population
title_short Outcomes of cataract surgery in a rural and urban south Indian population
title_sort outcomes of cataract surgery in a rural and urban south indian population
topic Cataract surgery
epidemiology
India
population
visual impairment
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2010;volume=58;issue=3;spage=223;epage=228;aulast=Vijaya
work_keys_str_mv AT vijayalingam outcomesofcataractsurgeryinaruralandurbansouthindianpopulation
AT georgeronnie outcomesofcataractsurgeryinaruralandurbansouthindianpopulation
AT rashimaa outcomesofcataractsurgeryinaruralandurbansouthindianpopulation
AT rajuprema outcomesofcataractsurgeryinaruralandurbansouthindianpopulation
AT arvindhemamalini outcomesofcataractsurgeryinaruralandurbansouthindianpopulation
AT baskaranmani outcomesofcataractsurgeryinaruralandurbansouthindianpopulation
AT veramesh outcomesofcataractsurgeryinaruralandurbansouthindianpopulation